BACKGROUND: Directional preference is a phenomenon that occurs in musculoskeletal disorders. It is associated with improved symptomatic and functional outcomes. Research has shown a 90% increase in the identification of directional preference in the peripheral joints between 2006 and 2012. There is currently no research analyzing if predictive variables exist for establishing directional preference. CASE DESCRIPTION: This report presents 19 consecutive patients with wrist pain. These patients were evaluated using a mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT)-based assessment. Patients were classified into the mechanical syndromes Derangement, Dysfunction, Postural, and Other. Patients classified with wrist Derangement were assessed for the presence of directional preference. Secondary analysis of predetermined variables was performed for association with directional preference. One case description was included to demonstrate MDT assessment, treatment, and clinical reasoning. RESULTS: Of the 19 patients evaluated, 15 (79%) were classified as having wrist Derangement. All patients with wrist Derangement demonstrated directional preference. Eight movements were found to establish directional preference. Each was unique with varying degrees of direction, load, and force. DISCUSSION: This report found directional preference to be higher (79%) than previously reported values. Historical and physical examination findings were analyzed to determine if there were associated variables of directional preference. Excessive mechanical stress was found to be the most associated factor in predicting directional preference. These findings may lead to a greater understanding of peripheral MDT assessment, which may lead to increased identification of directional preference and improved patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
BACKGROUND: Directional preference is a phenomenon that occurs in musculoskeletal disorders. It is associated with improved symptomatic and functional outcomes. Research has shown a 90% increase in the identification of directional preference in the peripheral joints between 2006 and 2012. There is currently no research analyzing if predictive variables exist for establishing directional preference. CASE DESCRIPTION: This report presents 19 consecutive patients with wrist pain. These patients were evaluated using a mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT)-based assessment. Patients were classified into the mechanical syndromes Derangement, Dysfunction, Postural, and Other. Patients classified with wrist Derangement were assessed for the presence of directional preference. Secondary analysis of predetermined variables was performed for association with directional preference. One case description was included to demonstrate MDT assessment, treatment, and clinical reasoning. RESULTS: Of the 19 patients evaluated, 15 (79%) were classified as having wrist Derangement. All patients with wrist Derangement demonstrated directional preference. Eight movements were found to establish directional preference. Each was unique with varying degrees of direction, load, and force. DISCUSSION: This report found directional preference to be higher (79%) than previously reported values. Historical and physical examination findings were analyzed to determine if there were associated variables of directional preference. Excessive mechanical stress was found to be the most associated factor in predicting directional preference. These findings may lead to a greater understanding of peripheral MDT assessment, which may lead to increased identification of directional preference and improved patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Authors: Sinikka Kilpikoski; Olavi Airaksinen; Markku Kankaanpää; Päivi Leminen; Tapio Videman; Markku Alen Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2002-04-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Mark W Werneke; Daniel Deutscher; Dennis L Hart; Paul Stratford; Joel Ladin; Jon Weinberg; Scott Herbowy; Linda Resnik Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Richard Rosedale; Ravi Rastogi; Stephen May; Bert M Chesworth; Frank Filice; Sean Willis; James Howard; Douglas Naudie; Shawn M Robbins Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Susan L Edmond; Guillermo Cutrone; Mark Werneke; Jason Ward; David Grigsby; Jon Weinberg; William Oswald; Dave Oliver; Troy McGill; Dennis L Hart Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Lindsay Carlton; Joseph R Maccio; Joseph G Maccio; Andrew Braga; Elizabeth Tomanio; Anastasia Belikov Journal: J Man Manip Ther Date: 2018-03-29