Literature DB >> 29449351

Regional variation and predictors of over-registration in English primary care in 2014: a spatial analysis.

Patrick Burch1, Tim Doran2, Evangelos Kontopantelis1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are more people registered with a general practice in England than are estimated to be resident in the country. The reasons behind this are not fully understood. We investigated the levels of over-registration (or under-registration) in English primary care, their regional variability and their association with population and geographical characteristics.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study using mid-year population estimates for 2014 and general practice populations for the same year. We calculated levels of patient registration with English primary care, in relation to census-derived population estimates, at various geographical levels of interest: regions, clinical commissioning groups and lower super output areas (LSOAs, 2011 census derived geographical areas of 1500 people on average). We used linear regressions to investigate the relationship between levels of registration and area deprivation, urbanicity, ethnicity, age, sex and mean distance to practice.
RESULTS: The total over-registration rate for England was 3.9% (2 097 101 people) but there was wide regional variability. London had significantly higher levels of over-registration (6.0% and 515 063 people) than other areas in England. Higher levels of over-registration at the LSOA level were associated with greater proportions of non-White British residents, women, elderly people and higher levels of social deprivation.
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that high mobility and health need may be the underlying causes of over-registrations. The regional variation in over-registration, with London being an outlier, points towards potential inequalities in resourcing of primary care and the ability of the National Health Service to adequately match funding to population need. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  general practice; health policy; primary care; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29449351     DOI: 10.1136/jech-2017-210176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  3 in total

1.  The dynamics of frailty development and progression in older adults in primary care in England (2006-2017): a retrospective cohort profile.

Authors:  Carole Fogg; Simon D S Fraser; Paul Roderick; Simon de Lusignan; Andrew Clegg; Sally Brailsford; Abigail Barkham; Harnish P Patel; Vivienne Windle; Scott Harris; Shihua Zhu; Tracey England; Dave Evenden; Francesca Lambert; Bronagh Walsh
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.921

2.  Consultation patterns and frequent attenders in UK primary care from 2000 to 2019: a retrospective cohort analysis of consultation events across 845 general practices.

Authors:  Evangelos Kontopantelis; Maria Panagioti; Tracey Farragher; Luke A Munford; Rosa Parisi; Claire Planner; Sharon Spooner; Alice Tse; Darren M Ashcroft; Aneez Esmail
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  OpenSAFELY: Representativeness of electronic health record platform OpenSAFELY-TPP data compared to the population of England.

Authors:  Colm Andrews; Anna Schultze; Helen Curtis; William Hulme; John Tazare; Stephen Evans; Amir Mehrkar; Sebastian Bacon; George Hickman; Christopher Bates; John Parry; Frank Hester; Sam Harper; Jonathan Cockburn; David Evans; Tom Ward; Simon Davy; Peter Inglesby; Ben Goldacre; Brian MacKenna; Laurie Tomlinson; Alex Walker
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2022-07-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.