Literature DB >> 29449245

Selection for family medicine residency training in Canada: How consistently are the same students ranked by different programs?

Keith Wycliffe-Jones1, Kent G Hecker2, Shirley Schipper3, Maureen Topps4, Jeanine Robinson5, Tasnima Abedin6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the consistency of the ranking of Canadian and US medical graduates who applied to Canadian family medicine (FM) residency programs between 2007 and 2013.
DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Family medicine residency programs in Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All 17 Canadian medical schools allowed access to their anonymized program rank-order lists of students applying to FM residency programs submitted to the first iteration of the Canadian Resident Matching Service match from 2007 to 2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The rank position of medical students who applied to more than 1 FM residency program on the rank-order lists submitted by the programs. Anonymized ranking data submitted to the Canadian Resident Matching Service from 2007 to 2013 by all 17 FM residency programs were used. Ranking data of eligible Canadian and US medical graduates were analyzed to assess the within-student and between-student variability in rank score. These covariance parameters were then used to calculate the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for all programs. Program descriptions and selection criteria were also reviewed to identify sites with similar profiles for subset ICC analysis.
RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2013, the consistency of ranking by all programs was fair at best (ICC = 0.34 to 0.39). The consistency of ranking by larger urban-based sites was weak to fair (ICC = 0.23 to 0.36), and the consistency of ranking by sites focusing on training for rural practice was weak to moderate (ICC = 0.16 to 0.55).
CONCLUSION: In most cases, there is a low level of consistency of ranking of students applying for FM training in Canada. This raises concerns regarding fairness, particularly in relation to expectations around equity and distributive justice in selection processes. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29449245      PMCID: PMC5964389     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  5 in total

1.  The lore of admissions policies: contrasting formal and informal understandings of the residency selection process.

Authors:  Shiphra Ginsburg; Martin Schreiber; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.853

2.  Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference.

Authors:  David Prideaux; Chris Roberts; Kevin Eva; Angel Centeno; Peter McCrorie; Chris McManus; Fiona Patterson; David Powis; Ara Tekian; David Wilkinson
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Seeking a better (residency) match.

Authors:  Neil Chanchlani
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Job context, selection decision outcome, and the perceived fairness of selection tests: biodata as an illustrative case.

Authors:  T J Elkins; J S Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2000-06

5.  Evaluating candidate reactions to selection practices using organisational justice theory.

Authors:  Fiona Patterson; Lara Zibarras; Victoria Carr; Bill Irish; Simon Gregory
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.251

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Analysis of factors affecting Canadian medical students' success in the residency match.

Authors:  Joshua Lakoff; Kelly Howse; Nicholas Cofie; Sylvia Heeneman; Nancy Dalgarno
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2020-07-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.