Reactivity of Two-Electron-Reduced Boron Formazanate Compounds with Electrophiles: Facile N-H/N-C Bond Homolysis Due to the Formation of Stable Ligand Radicals.

The reactivity of a boron complex with a redox-active formazanate ligand, LBPh2 [L = PhNNC( p-tol)NNPh], was studied. Two-electron reduction of this main-group complex generates the stable, nucleophilic dianion [LBPh2]2-, which reacts with the electrophiles BnBr and H2O to form products that derive from ligand benzylation and protonation, respectively. The resulting complexes are anionic boron analogues of leucoverdazyls. N-C and N-H bond homolysis of these compounds was studied by exchange NMR spectroscopy and kinetic experiments. The weak N-C and N-H bonds in these systems derive from the stability of the resulting borataverdazyl radical, in which the unpaired electron is delocalized over the four N atoms in the ligand backbone. We thus demonstrate the ability of this system to take up two electrons and an electrophile (E+ = Bn+, H+) in a process that takes place on the organic ligand. In addition, we show that the [2e-/E+] stored on the ligand can be converted to E• radicals, reactivity that has implications in energy storage applications such as hydrogen evolution.

Introduction

A key feature in the reactivity of molecular n class="Chemical">complexes with traclass="Chemical">nsitioclass="Chemical">n-class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">metal centers is their ability to change oxidation states via electron-transfer reactions. This has allowed the development of a large variety of redox-based catalytic transformations that are of importance in the synthesis of organic molecules, polymers, and materials. Often these reactions rely on two-electron steps (e.g., oxidative addition/reductive elimination). Also, in energy applications, interconversion between redox states in simple small molecules is relevant, and catalysis is imperative to allow high reaction rates and to control product selectivity. With the transition from a fossil-based to a renewable energy supply, a key challenge is to develop reliable, cheap methods to convert and store sustainable energy into chemicals (“solar fuels”).[1] Examples of chemical reactions for energy storage include CO2 reduction to CO, formic acid, or methanol,[2] the interconversion between N2 and NH3,[3] and H2O splitting.[4] In the latter, the oxidation of H2O (2H2O → O2 + 4H+ + 4e–)[5] provides protons and electrons that can be used to drive a multitude of subsequent reactions, either directly or via the formation of H2. The high thermodynamic and kinetic stability of several of these molecules (e.g., CO2 and N2) and the multistep, multielectron nature of their transformation place significant demands on the catalyst design: catalysts should be stable in a variety of redox states, be able to efficiently transform a multitude of intermediates en route to the final product(s), and at the same time have low activation barriers for each individual step in the reaction sequence. Against this backdrop, it is perhaps not surprising that there is much interest in molecular catalysts for energy applications because these offer the possibility of tuning the catalyst properties with great precision via rational molecular design and can provide detailed insight into the reaction mechanism(s) at play.

The majority of synthetic molecular catalysts that operate via elementary steps involving changes in the oxidation state are proposed to do so by changing the formal oxidation state of the central n class="Chemical">metal atom. Iclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">contrast, Nature often uses metalloenzymes in which there is an organic redox-active cofactor adjacent or bound to the active site. The role of these redox-active moieties is to accumulate redox equivalents that can subsequently be used by the metalloenzyme to perform challenging multielectron transformations. Examples of such metalloenzymes include galactose oxidase[6] and cytochrome P450,[7] which store redox equivalents in the organic ligand scaffold to ultimately perform two-electron oxidation of alcohols and aliphatic CH bonds, respectively. Inspired by these enzymatic systems, there is increasing interest in the chemistry of synthetic catalysts with redox-active ligands.[8] The electronic structure of such complexes, which underpins our understanding of the reactivity, is only beginning to be uncovered in recent years. As an example, iron porphyrin complexes that perform electrocatalytic CO2 reduction at the formal Fe0 potential have recently been shown to consist of an intermediate-spin FeII center that is antiferromagnetically coupled to a two-electron-reduced porphyrin diradical; the reducing equivalents in this catalyst species thus reside on the organic ligand.[9] Moreover, electrocatalytic CO2 reduction using a porphyrin complex with a redox-innocent ZnII ion was recently reported,[10] further highlighting the importance of ligand-based redox reactions in these systems. Recent studies on azo-containing pincer ligands have shown that also alcohol dehydrogenation can be catalyzed via a pathway that involves a reduced azo moiety.[11] Similarly, studies on molecular electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) have identified several systems in which the mechanism does not involve “traditional” metal hydride intermediates;[12] instead, the organic ligand is proposed to be involved as the locus of reduction, protonation, or both. Thus, the assembly of two protons and two electrons as required for H2 production requires a delicate interplay between the reactivity of the metal center and that of the ligand. Illustrative examples include cobaloximes[13] (Chart , A) and related compounds,[14] for which there has been considerable debate on the intermediates that lead to H2 formation,[15,16] and nickel diphosphine complexes with a “pendant” proton-relay site (Chart , B).[17] In addition, hydrogen evolution catalysts are known with “redox-active” ligands: homogeneous cobalt dithiolene compounds have been pioneered by Holland and Eisenberg (Chart , C),[18−20] and these were recently extended to heterogeneous systems[21] and their mechanisms studied computationally.[22] Recent work from Grapperhaus and co-workers identified homogeneous proton reduction catalysts that proceed via ligand-centered reactions in which metal hydride species are not involved (Chart , D),[23] and also nickel porphyrin HER catalysts have been shown to undergo reduction/protonation to lead to an organic hydride as the key intermediate generated by ligand-based [2e–/H+] reactivity.[24] In addition to catalysts containing transition-metal centers, examples have been reported of main-group complexes that are active in hydrogen evolution,[25] as illustrated by Berben’s aluminum complexes with reduced pyridinediimine ligands (Chart , E).

Chart 1

The mechanistic ambiguities in (electro)catalysis and the new types of reactivities that can result with n class="Chemical">metal class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">complexes that contain redox-active ligands make these interesting systems for further exploration. Intrigued by work from the Hicks group on formazanate ligands as nitrogen-rich, redox-active analogues of the well-known β-diketiminates,[26] our group has started a research program to explore the coordination chemistry, redox behavior, and reactivity of complexes with formazanate ligands.[27] Although some early reports on related complexes exist,[28,29] it is only recently that interest in this class of ligands has gained momentum. Concurrent with our work, the Gilroy group and others have reported related complexes with formazanate ligands and studied the properties of these compounds[30,31] and materials derived thereof.[32] Previously, we studied ligand-based reductions in boron formazanate compounds and showed that both one- and two-electron-reduced products can be obtained (Scheme ).[33] For the boron difluoride derivative, two-electron reduction leads to the elimination of 2 equiv of F– and the formation of a boron carbenoid intermediate, the fate of which is ultimately a series of B3N3 heterocyclic products that incorporate the boron formazanate fragment (Scheme ).[34]

Scheme 1

Synthesis of One- and Two-Electron-Reduced Boron Formazanate Compounds and Their Conversion to BN Heterocyclic Products via an N-Heterocyclic Boron(I) Carbenoid Intermediate

In this Forum Article, we present n class="Chemical">boron class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">complexes with the formazanate ligand L [LBPh2 (2), where L = [PhNNC(p-tol)NNPh]−] and explore the nucleophilic reactivity of the corresponding two-electron-reduced complex [LBPh2]2– (2) with the electrophiles BnBr and H2O. The products are group 13 analogues of leucoverdazyls (tetrahydro-1,2,4,5-tetrazines). Our results demonstrate that, starting from neutral 2, the sequential “storage” of two electrons and 1 equiv of an electrophile (E+ = Bn+, H+) occurs in this main-group compound, an overall [2e–/E+] process that takes place exclusively at the organic ligand. The ability of the products to subsequently undergo homolytic N–H and N–C bond cleavage was investigated by exchange NMR spectroscopy and kinetic experiments.

Results and Discussion

The ligand n class="Chemical">1H, its class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">corresponding boron complex 2, and the dianion 2 were prepared as reported previously (Scheme ).[33c] Treatment of the two-electron-reduced, dianionic boron formazanate compound 2 with BnBr on an NMR scale in tetrahydrofuran (THF)-d8 resulted in the clean formation of a new compound. The appearance of a set of (broad) diastereotopic protons at 3.78 and 3.42 ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum is indicative of a benzyl group attached to an N atom of the formazanate ligand, and the product is formulated as the ligand-benzylated compound [BnLBPh2]− (3; Scheme ). Repeating the reaction on a preparative scale allowed the isolation of 3 (as its sodium salt) in 92% yield as a waxy green solid upon precipitation with hexane. NMR analysis of isolated 3 at room temperature in a THF-d8 solution shows fluxional behavior, with several resonances being broadened. A variable-temperature NMR study (500 MHz, THF-d8) in the temperature range between −30 and +70 °C shows that the broadening of the diastereotopic benzyl CH2 resonances is due to chemical exchange: two sharp doublets are observed at −25 °C (3.79 and 3.38 ppm) that are mutually coupled with 2JHH = 15.3 Hz. At 70 °C, these signals are coalesced and appear as a sharp singlet at 3.69 ppm. Resonances due to the phenyl groups bound to boron are also exchange-broadened, with two distinct BPh resonances observed at low temperature that coalesce to a single set for the BPh2 moiety at temperatures >65 °C. These observations are taken as an indication that in the highly congested structure of 3 the rotation around the N–CH2Ph bond is “geared” to rotation of the BPh moieties. The p-H atoms of the inequivalent NPh rings in 3 are observed at 6.16 and 6.07 ppm, and the former shows additional coupling, the magnitude of which is temperature-dependent. We attribute this feature to through-space interactions with protons of the N-benzyl ring due to their close proximity. The 11B NMR resonance at 1.16 ppm is indicative of a four-coordinate B center, supporting the assignment of 3 as a boron diphenyl complex with a benzylated formazanate fragment. The reaction of 2 with BnBr is best regarded as a SN2-type nucleophilic substitution, with the highly charged formazanate ligand in 2 acting as the nucleophile.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of Compounds 3 and 3

Similarly, the reaction of 2 with 1 equiv of n class="Chemical">H2O results iclass="Chemical">n the cleaclass="Chemical">n formatioclass="Chemical">n of the class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">corresponding protonated product 3 with precipitation of NaOH (Scheme ). The diagnostic N–H resonance of 3 is found at 5.04 ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum, while the ligand and BPh2 groups in 3 are similar to those in 3 with two upfield N–Ph NMR resonances due to p-H at 6.12 and 6.08 ppm. The similarity of the NMR spectral data for 3 and 3 suggests that they have comparable structures, with the same site of attack in the formazanate ligand for both electrophiles. The compounds are invariably obtained as oily materials, but storage of a sample of 3 (as a green oil) on THF/hexane at −30 °C for several days allowed the oil to solidify and form forest-green crystals. Unfortunately, the crystals melt again when taken out of the mother liquor, and we were unable to obtain structural data by X-ray crystallography. Although, in principle, two structural types can be plausibly formulated for these compounds (six- and five-membered ring isomers; see Scheme ), NMR spectroscopy is most consistent with a six-membered cyclic structure (shown as 3). In particular, two-dimensional NOESY NMR spectroscopy showed cross-peaks of similar intensity between the N–H resonance and the o-H signals of both the p-tolyl and one of the N–Ph rings, as expected for structures 3. In addition, a comparison of the empirical and density functional theory (DFT)-calculated NMR chemical shifts is most consistent with six-membered chelate rings (see Supporting Information for details). Finally, six-membered-ring carbon-based analogues of 3– (leucoverdazyls) are well-established in the literature, and the reactivity of 3 (vide infra) is similar to that in the organic analogues.[35] On the basis of these considerations, we propose that compounds 3 have the structures shown in Scheme . Related charge-neutral boron hydride compounds were prepared by the thermolysis of (formazanate)BH2 compounds. In these systems, intramolecular transfer of a hydride from the BH moiety to the formazanate ligand occurs at ca. 100 °C, which also formally involves a [2e–/H+] modification of the ligand, but this is accompanied by N–N bond cleavage as a result of a second hydride being transferred.[36] The current approach of sequential two-electron reduction, followed by external electrophile addition, leads to the clean formation of “borataleucoverdazyls”, a class of compounds that to the best of our knowledge have not been prepared previously.

The UV/vis spectra of n class="Chemical">compouclass="Chemical">nds 3 aclass="Chemical">nd 3 iclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">THF are similar and show absorption maxima at 400 and 395 nm, respectively, presumably because of a π → π* transition in the (localized) N=C bond (Figure S5). These bands are shifted to higher energies in comparison to the intense π → π* transition band in compounds with fully delocalized formazanate ligands (e.g., λmax = 500 nm in 2) but in the same range as that found in complexes with the same oxidation state of the ligand (L3–), such as the precursor 2 (λmax = 389 nm).[33c]

In the n class="Chemical">coclass="Chemical">ntext of protoclass="Chemical">n reductioclass="Chemical">n chemistry, it was of iclass="Chemical">nterest to evaluate the further reactivity of these class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">compounds. The anionic boron compounds 3 are unreactive toward an additional 1 equiv of electrophile (BnBr or H2O) but do react with strong acids such as p-toluenesulfonic acid. The NMR spectra of these reactions, however, show a complex mixture, and in no case could the formation of H2 (or BnH) be ascertained. The lack of controlled further reactivity of 3 (other than decomposition to unidentified products when reacted with strong acid) might indicate that these anionic compounds are not sufficiently basic (nucleophilic) to react with mild electrophiles. Although these preliminary data suggest that in the present system accumulation of the [2e–/2H+] equivalents required for proton reduction is not feasible, we anticipate that changes in the ligand substitution pattern and/or the use of acids of intermediate pKa might solve these problems. It is important to note that ligand-centered reactions that accumulate two electrons and a proton ([2e–/H+]) were recently shown to generate an organic “hydride equivalent” in the case of a nickel “hangman” porphyrin that is able to release H2 following a second protonation step.[24] In this system, the sequence of reduction/protonation events (and thus the mechanism of H2 evolution catalysis) was shown to be highly dependent on the acid strength. Our results demonstrate that a similar accumulation of [2e–/H+] can take place in the boron complex 2, but the reactivity of the resulting organic (ligand) “hydride” needs further exploration.

Given the similarity of the anionic n class="Chemical">compouclass="Chemical">nds 3 to class="Chemical">neutral class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">leucoverdazyls (1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1,2,4,5-tetrazines), we became interested in cleavage of the N–H and N–C bonds in these systems. Hicks and co-workers recently described that coordination to a Ru center weakens the N–C bond in an N-benzyltetrazine via metal–ligand noninnocence and leads to homolysis that is ca. 40 times faster than that without metal bound.[37] The influence of main-group or transition-metal elements incorporated into these heterocyclic structures has not been studied before, but homolytic cleavage is expected to generate the radical anions 2, which contain ligand-based radicals and are relatively stable due to delocalization of the unpaired electron over all four N atoms (Figure S14).[33c,35b] For the “borataleucoverdazyl” 3, its lack of symmetry (C1) results in inequivalent N–Ph groups, and 2D EXSY NMR spectroscopy in a THF-d8 solution shows chemical exchange cross-peaks between the well-separated o-H resonances of these rings, which is the result of net H-atom transfer between the two “internal” N atoms in the ligand backbone. The mechanism of H-atom transfer can occur either via a dissociative mechanism (N–H bond homolysis) or intramolecularly via a bimolecular (associative) pathway. To probe the mechanism of H-atom transfer, the exchange kinetics were measured by 2D EXSY NMR spectroscopy in the temperature range 10–65 °C. Subsequent Eyring analysis afforded the activation parameters as ΔH⧧ = 44.2 ± 0.9 kJ·mol–1 and ΔS⧧ = −93 ± 3 J·mol–1·K–1 (see the Supporting Information for details). The large, negative activation entropy is in agreement with a bimolecular mechanism, and the activation enthalpy is too low for (homolytic) N–H bond dissociation as the rate-determining step. An estimation of the N–H bond dissociation energy using DFT calculations (via geometry optimizations at increasing N–H distances) reveals a value of ca. 275 kJ·mol–1, in agreement with the experimental values for leucoverdazyls (281–307 kJ·mol–1).[38] These arguments support a (symmetrical) exchange pathway via the bimolecular mechanism shown in Scheme .

Scheme 3

The reaction of 3 with TEMPO in n class="Chemical">THF is fast aclass="Chemical">nd geclass="Chemical">nerates 2•– acclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">cording to electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy by comparison to an authentic sample. Despite the presence of paramagnetic species, the 1H NMR spectra show relatively sharp resonances for 3 and TEMPO-H, and complete (>95%) consumption of the starting material for a 1:1 mixture indicates that the N–H bond in 3 is weaker than that in TEMPO-H, for which a bond dissociation free energy of 270–280 kJ·mol–1 in organic solvents has been reported.[39]

In n class="Chemical">coclass="Chemical">ntrast to 3, the beclass="Chemical">nzyl aclass="Chemical">nalogue 3 does class="Chemical">not show 2D EXSY NMR cross-peaks eveclass="Chemical">n at elevated temperature (75 °C). This likely is due to a chaclass="Chemical">nge iclass="Chemical">n the mechaclass="Chemical">nism, with (dissociative) homolytic cleavage of the N–C boclass="Chemical">nd class="Chemical">now operative. To obtaiclass="Chemical">n iclass="Chemical">nsight iclass="Chemical">nto the N–C(class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">Bn) bond dissociation energy, the kinetics of benzyl transfer from 3 to TEMPO were measured in the temperature range between 55 and 85 °C. To effectively trap the Bn• radical formed, kinetic experiments were carried out in the presence of 20 equiv of TEMPO. Monitoring the reaction at regular time intervals by 1H NMR spectroscopy showed clean exponential decay of the starting material and the concomitant appearance of TEMPO-Bn. Eyring analysis afforded the activation parameters as ΔH⧧ = 121 ± 5 kJ·mol–1 and ΔS⧧ = 77 ± 14 J·mol–1·K–1 (see the Supporting Information for details). Under similar conditions, transfer of the 4-fluorobenzyl group in 3 to TEMPO was evaluated, which was shown to have activation parameters of ΔH⧧ = 107 ± 3 kJ·mol–1 and ΔS⧧ = 36 ± 9 J·mol–1·K–1. In agreement with rate-determining N–C(Bn) bond homolysis, the activation entropy is large and positive, and ΔH⧧ can be taken as an approximation of the N–C bond dissociation enthalpy.[37,40] The ΔH⧧ values of 121 ± 5 and 107 ± 7 kJ·mol–1 for 3 and 3, respectively, are somewhat smaller than that in pure carbon-based N-alkyl-substituted benzyltetrazines[37,41] and fall in the lower range of C–O bond dissociation energies in the well-studied alkoxyamines[40,42] or Ti–O bond dissociation energies in titanocene(IV) complexes derived from nitroxyl radicals.[43]

Concluding Remarks

In n class="Chemical">coclass="Chemical">nclusioclass="Chemical">n, this work shows that the ligaclass="Chemical">nd iclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">boron formazanate complexes is reactive and can be used to accumulate [2e–/E+] equivalents (E+ = Bn+, H+), a step that has precedent in nontraditional hydrogen evolution catalysts (i.e., those not going through metal hydride intermediates; E+ = H+).[24] Although preliminary attempts to elicit “organohydride” reactivity in 3 by protonation, a reaction relevant to hydrogen evolution, were not successful, compounds 3 are shown to have weak N–H/N–C bonds that are readily cleaved homolytically. Our results complement Hicks’ observation that N–C bond homolysis in coordinated leucoverdazyls may be controlled by metal–ligand covalency and consequent spin delocalization onto the metal center. The incorporation of an element other than C (here, B) in the six-membered ring of leucoverdazyls similarly allows modulation of the homolytic N–C and N–H bond cleavage energies. The weak N–C and N–H bonds in these systems is a result of the stability of the resulting boron formazanate radical (“borataverdazyl”) species. Having established the synthesis and characterization of “borataleucoverdazyls”, we are currently exploring ligand-substituent effects on the reactivity of these compounds. In general, we anticipate that the ability to influence the basicity, radical stability, and N–H/N–C bond strength of compounds containing the formazanate ligand, either via substituent effects or by the incorporation of different central elements (main group or transition metal), can be used to modulate the reactivity and steer it away from the observed radical reactions (H•/Bn• transfer) toward multielectron reactions (e.g., [2e–/2H+]). These reactions are of fundamental importance, for example, in electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution, and we are actively working toward applying our systems in this area.

Experimental Section

General Considerations

All manipulations were carried out under a n class="Chemical">nitrogen or aclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">argon atmosphere using standard glovebox, Schlenk, and vacuum-line techniques. Toluene and hexane (Aldrich, anhydrous, 99.8%) were passed over columns of Al2O3 (Fluka), BASF R3-11-supported copper oxygen scavenger, and molecular sieves (Aldrich, 4 Å). THF (Aldrich, anhydrous, 99.8%) was dried by percolation over columns of Al2O3 (Fluka). Compounds 3, 3, and 3 are highly air-sensitive, and the solvents (THF and hexane) used for their preparation and characterization were additionally dried on a sodium/potassium alloy and subsequently vacuum-transferred and stored under nitrogen. All solvents were degassed prior to use and stored under nitrogen. THF-d8 (Sigma-Aldrich) was vacuum-transferred from a sodium/potassium alloy and stored under nitrogen. Compound 2 (as its disodium salt, [(PhNNC(p-tol)NNPh)BPh2][Na2(THF)6]) was synthesized according to a published procedure.[33c] NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury 400, Inova 500, or Bruker 600 spectrometer. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were referenced internally using the residual solvent resonances and reported in ppm relative to TMS (0 ppm); J is reported in hertz. The assignments of NMR resonances were aided by COSY, NOESY, HSQC, and HMBC experiments using standard pulse sequences. UV/vis spectra were recorded in a THF solution (∼10–3 M) in a quartz cuvette using an AVANTES AvaSpec-2048 spectrometer. Samples for elemental analyses were sent to Kolbe Microanalytical Laboratory (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany). However, despite our best efforts, no satisfactory analysis data could be obtained for these compounds, which is likely due to their highly air-sensitive nature and/or to the fact that these compounds are oily and therefore still contain residual solvent and/or (unknown) impurities. It should be noted, however, that NMR spectroscopy indicates that compounds 3 are formed cleanly (>90% by integration relative to an internal standard).

Synthesis of [HLBPh2]Na(THF)2 (3)

n class="Chemical">Compouclass="Chemical">nd 2 (400 mg, 0.598 mmol) was dissolved iclass="Chemical">n 2 mL of class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">THF in a Schlenk tube inside the glovebox. To this was added 1 equiv of H2O (as a dilute solution in THF), which caused the color to change from orange to purple-red. After the mixture was stirred for 1 h, all of the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was washed with hexane (3 × 2 mL). Subsequently, drying under vacuum gave compound 3 as an oily green material (339 mg, 0.524 mmol, 87%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, THF-d8, −5 °C): δ 7.79 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, p-tol o-H), 7.39 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H, BPh o-H), 7.01 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, p-tol m-H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, N(2)Ph o-H), 6.91 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H, BPh m-H), 6.85 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, BPh p-H), 6.67–6.52 (overlapped, 6H, N(1)Ph (o + m)-H and N(2)Ph m-H), 6.12 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, N(2)Ph p-H), 6.08 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H, N(1)Ph p-H), 5.04 (s, 1H, NCNH), 3.62 (m, 10H, THF), 2.28 (s, 3H, p-tol CH3), 1.78 (m, 10H, THF). 11B NMR (128.0 MHz, THF-d8, 25 °C): δ 0.4 (s). 13C NMR (125 MHz, THF-d8, −5 °C): δ 156.39 (BPh ipso-C), 155.14 (N(1)Ph ipso-C), 154.55 (N(2)Ph ipso-C), 138.48 (NCN), 136.20 (p-tol CNCN), 135.88 (BPh o-CH), 135.62 (p-tol CCH3), 128.75 (p-tol m-CH), 127.40 (N(2)Ph m-CH), 126.86 (BPh m-CH), 126.78 (N(1)Ph o-CH), 125.47 (p-tol o-CH), 124.33 (BPh p-CH), 118.94 (N(2)Ph o-CH), 117.35 (N(1)Ph m-CH), 113.93 (N(2)Ph p-CH), 113.31 (N(1)Ph p-CH), 68.30 (THF), 26.44 (THF), 21.41 (p-tol CH3).

Synthesis of [BnLBPh2]Na(THF)2 (3)

n class="Chemical">Compouclass="Chemical">nd 2 (400 mg, 0.498 mmol) was dissolved iclass="Chemical">n 2 mL of class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">THF in a Schlenk tube inside a glovebox. To this was added 1 equiv of benzyl bromide, which caused the color to change from orange to purple-red. After the mixture was stirred for 1 h, all of the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was washed with hexane (3 × 2 mL). Subsequently, drying under vacuum gave compound 3 as an oily green material (292 mg, 0.450 mmol, 92%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, THF-d8, 10 °C): δ 7.83 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, p-tol o-H), 7.69 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H, B(1)Ph o-H), 7.09 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, B(1)Ph m-H), 7.05–6.98 (overlapped, 6H, (benzyl)Ph o-H, B(2)Ph o-H, and p-tol m-H), 6.97 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, B(1)Ph p-H), 6.94 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H, N(1)Ph o-H), 6.87–6.79 (m, 3H, (benzyl)Ph (m + p)-H), 6.57–6.53 (overlapped, 5H, N(1)Ph m-H and B(2)Ph (m + p)-H), 6.47–6.45 (m, 4H, N(2)Ph (o + m)-H), 6.17–6.14 (m, 1H, N(2)Ph p-H), 6.07 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, N(1)Ph p-H), 3.78 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H, benzyl CH2), 3.62 (m, 8H, THF), 3.42 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H, benzyl CH2), 2.28 (s, 3H, p-tol CH3), 1.78 (m, 8H, THF). 11B NMR (128.3 MHz, THF-d8, 25 °C): δ 1.16 (s). 13C NMR (150 MHz, THF-d8, 10 °C): δ 158.66 (N(2)Ph ipso-C), 155.48 (B(1,2)Ph ipso-C), 154.07 (N(1)Ph ipso-C), 142.34 (NCN), 141.66 ((benzyl)Ph ipso-C)), 137.67 (NCN-p-tol ipso-C), 137.17 (B(1)Ph o-CH), 137.08 (B(2)Ph o-CH), 135.25 (p-tol-CH3ipso-C), 129.62 ((benzyl)Ph o-CH), 128.77 (p-tol m-CH), 127.41 (p-tol o-CH), 127.34 ((benzyl)Ph p-CH), 126.59 (B(2)Ph m-CH), 126.33 (B(1)Ph m-CH), 126.14 (N(2)Ph o-CH), 125.69 (B(2)Ph p-CH), 125.64 ((benzyl)Ph m-CH), 124.03 (B(1)Ph p-CH), 123.77 (N(2)Ph p-CH), 123.40 (N(1)Ph m-CH), 118.56 (N(1) Ph o-CH), 116.37 (N(2)Ph p-CH), 113.78 (N(1)Ph p-CH), 68.29 (THF), 26.45 (THF), 21.37 (p-tol CH3).

Synthesis of [F-BnLBPh2]Na(THF)2 (3)

n class="Chemical">Compouclass="Chemical">nd 2 (100 mg, 0.12 mmol) was dissolved iclass="Chemical">n 1 mL of class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">THF in a Schlenk tube inside a glovebox. To this was added 1 equiv of 4-fluorobenzyl bromide, which caused the color to change from orange to purple-red. After the mixture was stirred for 1 h, all of the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was washed with hexane (3 × 2 mL). Subsequently, drying under vacuum gave compound 3 as an oily purple-red material (72 mg, 0.095 mmol, 79%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, THF-d8, 25 °C): δ 7.81 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, p-tol o-H), 7.69 (bs, 2H, BPh o-H), 7.10 (bs, 3H, BPh (m + p)-H), 7.02 (overlapped, 4H, BPh o-H and p-tol m-H), 7.00–6.96 (m, 2H, (benzyl)Ph o-H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, N(1)Ph o-H), 6.55 (overlapped, 7H, (benzyl)Ph m-H, N(1)Ph m-H, and BPh (m + p)-H), 6.47–6.45 (m, 4H, N(2)Ph (o + m)-H), 6.16 (m, 1H, N(2)Ph p-H), 6.07 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, N(1)Ph p-H), 3.75 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H, benzyl CH2), 3.39 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H, benzyl CH2), 2.29 (s, 3H, p-tol CH3). 19F NMR (376 MHz, THF-d8, 25 °C): δ −118.45 (m, benzyl p-F).