| Literature DB >> 29446874 |
Lisa M Potter1, Angela Q Maldonado2, Krista L Lentine3, Mark A Schnitzler3, Zidong Zhang3, Gregory P Hess4,5, Edward Garrity6, Bertram L Kasiske7,8, David A Axelrod9.
Abstract
Transplant immunosuppressants are often used off-label because of insufficient randomized prospective trial data to achieve organ-specific US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Transplant recipients who rely on Medicare Part D for immunosuppressant drug coverage are vulnerable to coverage denial for off-label prescriptions, unless use is supported by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)-approved compendia. An integrated dataset including national transplant registry data and 3 years of dispensed pharmacy records was used to identify the prevalence of immunosuppression use that is both off-label and not supported by CMS-approved compendia. Numbers of potentially vulnerable transplant recipients were identified. Off-label and off-compendia immunosuppression regimens are frequently prescribed (3-year mean: lung 66.5%, intestine 34.2%, pancreas 33.4%, heart 21.8%, liver 16.5%, kidney 0%). The annual retail cost of these at-risk medications exceeds $30 million. This population-based study of transplant immunosuppressants vulnerable to claim denials under Medicare Part D coverage demonstrates a substantial gap between clinical practice, current FDA approval processes, and policy mandates for pharmaceutical coverage. This coverage barrier reduces access to life-saving medications for patients without alternative resources and may increase the risk of graft loss and death from medication nonadherence.Entities:
Keywords: ethics and public policy; immunosuppressant; immunosuppression/immune modulation; insurance; insurance - public; law/legislation; off-label drug use
Year: 2018 PMID: 29446874 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14703
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086