M B Uddin1, C M Chow, S W Su. 1. Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Sleep apnea (SA), a common sleep disorder, can significantly decrease the quality of life, and is closely associated with major health risks such as cardiovascular disease, sudden death, depression, and hypertension. The normal diagnostic process of SA using polysomnography is costly and time consuming. In addition, the accuracy of different classification methods to detect SA varies with the use of different physiological signals. If an effective, reliable, and accurate classification method is developed, then the diagnosis of SA and its associated treatment will be time-efficient and economical. This study aims to systematically review the literature and present an overview of classification methods to detect SA using respiratory and oximetry signals and address the automated detection approach. APPROACH: Sixty-two included studies revealed the application of single and multiple signals (respiratory and oximetry) for the diagnosis of SA. MAIN RESULTS: Both airflow and oxygen saturation signals alone were effective in detecting SA in the case of binary decision-making, whereas multiple signals were good for multi-class detection. In addition, some machine learning methods were superior to the other classification methods for SA detection using respiratory and oximetry signals. SIGNIFICANCE: To deal with the respiratory and oximetry signals, a good choice of classification method as well as the consideration of associated factors would result in high accuracy in the detection of SA. An accurate classification method should provide a high detection rate with an automated (independent of human action) analysis of respiratory and oximetry signals. Future high-quality automated studies using large samples of data from multiple patient groups or record batches are recommended.
OBJECTIVE:Sleep apnea (SA), a common sleep disorder, can significantly decrease the quality of life, and is closely associated with major health risks such as cardiovascular disease, sudden death, depression, and hypertension. The normal diagnostic process of SA using polysomnography is costly and time consuming. In addition, the accuracy of different classification methods to detect SA varies with the use of different physiological signals. If an effective, reliable, and accurate classification method is developed, then the diagnosis of SA and its associated treatment will be time-efficient and economical. This study aims to systematically review the literature and present an overview of classification methods to detect SA using respiratory and oximetry signals and address the automated detection approach. APPROACH: Sixty-two included studies revealed the application of single and multiple signals (respiratory and oximetry) for the diagnosis of SA. MAIN RESULTS: Both airflow and oxygen saturation signals alone were effective in detecting SA in the case of binary decision-making, whereas multiple signals were good for multi-class detection. In addition, some machine learning methods were superior to the other classification methods for SA detection using respiratory and oximetry signals. SIGNIFICANCE: To deal with the respiratory and oximetry signals, a good choice of classification method as well as the consideration of associated factors would result in high accuracy in the detection of SA. An accurate classification method should provide a high detection rate with an automated (independent of human action) analysis of respiratory and oximetry signals. Future high-quality automated studies using large samples of data from multiple patient groups or record batches are recommended.
Authors: Tanmoy Paul; Omiya Hassan; Khuder Alaboud; Humayera Islam; Md Kamruz Zaman Rana; Syed K Islam; Abu S M Mosa Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2022-05-23
Authors: Daniel Álvarez; Gonzalo C Gutiérrez-Tobal; Fernando Vaquerizo-Villar; Fernando Moreno; Félix Del Campo; Roberto Hornero Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2022 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: Thijs E Nassi; Wolfgang Ganglberger; Haoqi Sun; Abigail A Bucklin; Siddharth Biswal; Michel J A M van Putten; Robert J Thomas; M Brandon Westover Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2022-05-19 Impact factor: 4.756
Authors: Joachim A Behar; Niclas Palmius; Qiao Li; Silverio Garbuio; Fabìola P G Rizzatti; Lia Bittencourt; Sergio Tufik; Gari D Clifford Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2019-06-07
Authors: Sami Nikkonen; Henri Korkalainen; Samu Kainulainen; Sami Myllymaa; Akseli Leino; Laura Kalevo; Arie Oksenberg; Timo Leppänen; Juha Töyräs Journal: Sleep Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 5.849