Literature DB >> 29446567

Prognostic value of the index of microcirculatory resistance after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Tadashi Murai1, Taishi Yonetsu1, Yoshihisa Kanaji1, Eisuke Usui1, Masahiro Hoshino1, Masahiro Hada1, Rikuta Hamaya1, Yoshinori Kanno1, Tetsumin Lee1, Tsunekazu Kakuta1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of physiological indices in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. We investigated the prognostic efficacy of physiological indices obtained after PCI in patients with NSTE-ACS.
METHODS: Eighty-three patients (men: n = 70, age: 63.7 ± 9.7 years) undergoing PCI for NSTE-ACS within 48 hr postadmission were investigated. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) of the culprit vessels were measured after the completion of PCI. The patients were clinically followed up to determine major cardiac adverse events (MACE), including death, congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization, and remote coronary revascularization.
RESULTS: The median FFR, CFR, and IMR values were 0.90 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.86-0.95), 2.38 (IQR 1.75-4.17), and 22.9 (IQR 11.2-31.5), respectively. During a median follow-up of 20.7 months, 19 MACEs (22.9%) were documented. No significant difference in baseline patient characteristics, except for age, was detected between patients with and without MACE. Patients with MACE showed higher IMR and lower CFR than those without (IMR: 27.2 vs. 16.3; P = 0.001, CFR: 1.82 vs. 2.55; P = 0.04), whereas FFR was not significantly different (0.92 vs. 0.89; P = 0.72), irrespective of the MACE occurrence. Post-PCI IMR was the only independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio 1.033, 95% confidence interval 1.013-1.052, P = 0.001). The MACE-free survival was significantly worse in patients with high post-PCI IMR (χ2 7.12; P = 0.008).
CONCLUSION: Post-PCI IMR may help identify patients at high risk for subsequent adverse coronary events who require adjunctive therapeutic strategies.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute coronary syndrome; fractional flow reserve; index of microcirculatory resistance; microvascular resistance; percutaneous coronary intervention

Year:  2018        PMID: 29446567     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  6 in total

1.  Index of microcirculatory resistance: state-of-the-art and potential applications in computational simulation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Yingyi Geng; Xintong Wu; Haipeng Liu; Dingchang Zheng; Ling Xia
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  A randomized controlled trial of a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization strategy: Rationale and design of the TARGET FFR study.

Authors:  Damien Collison; John D McClure; Colin Berry; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  Why, When and How Should Clinicians Use Physiology in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes?

Authors:  Roberto Scarsini; Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Giovanni Luigi De Maria; Flavio Ribichini; Adrian Banning
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-04

4.  Relationship between the ST-Segment Resolution and Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients Who Underwent Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Byung Gyu Kim; Sung Woo Cho; Jeong-Ha Ha; Hyo Seung Ahn; Hye Young Lee; Gwang Sil Kim; Young Sup Byun; Kun Joo Rhee; Jong Chun Nah; Byung Ok Kim
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 1.866

5.  Effects of different strategies on high thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary catheterization.

Authors:  Yuyang Xiao; Xianghua Fu; Yanbo Wang; Yanming Fan; Yanqiang Wu; Wenlu Wang; Qian Zhang
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.439

6.  Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mihir A Kelshiker; Henry Seligman; James P Howard; Haseeb Rahman; Michael Foley; Alexandra N Nowbar; Christopher A Rajkumar; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Yousif Ahmad; Sayan Sen; Rasha Al-Lamee; Ricardo Petraco
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 35.855

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.