Literature DB >> 29446103

Carfilzomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients with early or late relapse following prior therapy: A subgroup analysis of the randomized phase 3 ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR trials.

Maria-Victoria Mateos1, Hartmut Goldschmidt2, Jesus San-Miguel3, Joseph Mikhael4, Lucy DeCosta5, Lifen Zhou6, Mihaela Obreja6, Julie Blaedel6, Zsolt Szabo7, Xavier Leleu8.   

Abstract

We performed analyses of the randomized phase 3 ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR trials to investigate the efficacy of carfilzomib among subgroups of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients who had early or late disease relapse following initiation of the immediately prior therapy. In ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR, patients had received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy. Patients in ASPIRE received carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) or lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd), and patients in ENDEAVOR received carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) or bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd). Patients with relapse ≤1 year after initiating the most recent prior line of therapy were categorized as early relapsers, and patients with relapse after >1 year were categorized as late relapsers. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in ASPIRE for early relapsers was 21.4 months for KRd vs 10.7 months for Rd (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.714; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.508-1.004; P = 0.0257), and for late relapsers was 29.7 months for KRd vs 18.2 months for Rd (HR: 0.675; 95% CI: 0.533-0.854; P = 0.0005). The overall response rate (ORR) for early relapsers was 83.2% for KRd vs 54.8% for Rd, and for late relapsers was 89.0% for KRd vs 69.7% for Rd. The median PFS in ENDEAVOR (Kd vs Vd) for early relapsers was 13.9 months vs 5.7 months (HR: 0.598; 95% CI: 0.423-0.846; P = 0.0017), and for late relapsers was 22.2 months vs 10.2 months (HR: 0.486; 95% CI: 0.382-0.620; P < 0.0001). The ORR (Kd vs Vd) for early relapsers was 63.4% vs 49.1% and for late relapsers was 81.8% vs 66.8%. In conclusion, patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who received carfilzomib-containing regimens had improved PFS and ORR compared with control groups, regardless of whether they had an early or late relapse following the most recent prior therapy.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trial; multiple myeloma; proteasome inhibitor; relapse

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29446103     DOI: 10.1002/hon.2499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 0278-0232            Impact factor:   5.271


  3 in total

1.  High-risk multiple myeloma: how to treat at diagnosis and relapse?

Authors:  María-Victoria Mateos; Borja Puertas Martínez; Verónica González-Calle
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

2.  Optimizing carfilzomib use in multiple myeloma treatment.

Authors:  Sung-Soo Yoon
Journal:  Blood Res       Date:  2019-09-25

3.  Carfilzomib Based Treatment Strategies in the Management of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma with Extramedullary Disease.

Authors:  Xiang Zhou; Patricia Flüchter; Katharina Nickel; Katharina Meckel; Janin Messerschmidt; David Böckle; Sebastian Knorz; Maximilian Johannes Steinhardt; Franziska Krummenast; Sophia Danhof; Hermann Einsele; K Martin Kortüm; Leo Rasche
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.