Literature DB >> 29445692

Does smoking status affect cost of hospitalization? Evidence from three main diseases associated with smoking in Iran.

Ali Akbari Sari1, Satar Rezaei2, Mohammad Arab1, Behzad Karami Matin2, Reza Majdzadeh3.   

Abstract

Background: Smoking is recognized as one of the main public health problems worldwide and is accounted for a high financial burden to healthcare systems and the society as a whole. This study was aimed at examining the effect of smoking status on cost of hospitalization among patients with lung cancer (LC), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and ischemic heart diseases (IHD) in Iran in 2014.
Methods: A total of 1,271 patients (consisting of 415 LC, 427 COPD and 429 IHD patients) were included in the study. Data on age, sex, and insurance status, length of hospital stay and cost of hospitalization were extracted from the medical records of the patients. The smoking status of the patients was obtained through a telephone survey. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to compare the costs of hospitalization of current, former and never smokers. The analysis was done using Stata v.12.
Results: The mean±SD cost of hospitalization per patient was 45.6 ± 41.8 million IR for current smokers, 34.8±23 million IR for former smokers and 27.6±24.6 million IR for never smokers, respectively. The findings indicated that the cost of hospitalization for current and former smokers was 65% and 26% in the unadjusted model and 35% and 24% in the adjusted model higher than for never smokers.
Conclusion: The findings revealed that smoking drains a large hospital resource and imposes a high financial burden on the health system and the society. Therefore, efforts should focus on reducing the prevalence of smoking and the negative economic consequences of smoking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost of Hospitalization; Generalized Linear Model; Iran; Smoking Status

Year:  2017        PMID: 29445692      PMCID: PMC5804450          DOI: 10.14196/mjiri.31.63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran        ISSN: 1016-1430


↑ What is “already known” in this topic:

This is the first attempt about examine the association between smoking status and the cost of hospitalization with a large sample in Iran.

→ What this article adds:

There is a statistically significant association between smoking and cost of hospitalization. The cost of hospitalization for current and former smokers was 35% and 24% higher than for never smokers.

Introduction

Smoking is the most important public health problem that requires attention globally (1, 2). Lung cancer, ischemic heart disease and respiratory illness, etc. among many other diseases are closely associated with and caused by smoking. Each year, more than five million adults die from conditions related to smoking. The annual death rate is expected to rise to about 8 million people by the year 2030. More than 80% of these deaths will be in low- and middle-income countries (3, 4). The financial consequences associated with smoking and related diseases to health systems as well as societies as a whole is considerably high (5-7). However, most evidence on the negative effect of smoking on utilization of health services, direct and indirect costs and work absenteeism has been from developed countries (7-16). Evidence from developing countries concerning the negative effects of smoking is less documented (2, 4). Recent evidence from Iran shows that the prevalence of smoking is 12.5% (23.4% f or males and 1.4% for females) and that an individual on average smokes 13.7 sticks of cigarettes daily (17). A previous study reported that smoking was accounted for 4,623 cancer deaths, 80,808 years of potential life lost and US$ 83,019,583 cost of productivity lost (4). To our knowledge, little information is available on the impact of smoking on healthcare cost, length of hospital stay and healthcare utilization related to smoking associated conditions in Iran (4, 15). However, reliable evidence is required to effectively reduce the prevalence of smoking and successfully implement smoking cessation interventions in the country. This study aimed to address the information gap concerning the effect of smoking status on cost of hospitalization for patients with lung cancer (LC), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and ischemic heart diseases (IHD) in Iran in 2014.

Methods

Study Setting

Tehran is a province as well as the capital city of Iran. According to the census 2011 report, the total population of the city was around 9 million, and 16 million in the wider metropolitan area. Tehran is the largest city in Iran, the second largest city in Western Asia, and the third largest in the Middle East.

Sample Size and Data Collection

In the health system network of Iran, inpatient care is delivered through hospitals owned by different providers. Governmental hospitals are the main providers of inpatient services and account for 68% of total hospital beds. Private hospitals account for 12% of the total hospital beds. However, Social Security Organization (SSO) and Armed Forces hospital beds account for 9 and 4%, respectively. Oil Company and NGOs hospital beds account for the rest of the share (18). The provider’s perspective was used to include the cost of hospitalization in the analysis. All patients aged 35 years and older, who were discharged from the hospitals during 21 March 2014 to 22 March 2015 and were managed for LC, COPD or IHD related to smoking constituted the study population. The latent period between initial exposure to smoking and occurrence of cancer is believed to be about 20 years and more (19). Thus, the patients were identified using the International Classification for Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for LC (C33-C34), COPD (J40-J44) and IHD (I20-I25). The samples for the study were selected in two stages. First, 1,503 patients (501 patients with LC, 501 patients with IHD and 501 patients with COPD) who were admitted during the study period were selected based on the proportion of hospital beds of the different providers. That is, 73% of the patients were from governmental hospitals, 12% from the private hospitals, 9% from social security hospitals and 4% from the Armed Forces hospitals. Data on sex, age, insurances status, type of disease, residence, length of hospital stay and hospitalization costs were retrieved from the patients’ medical records, using self-constructed checklist. In the next stage, information about smoking status of the selected patients was obtained through telephone survey. Based on the response of the interviewees, 1,271 patients (415 LC patients, 427 COPD patients and 429 IHD patients) were included in the analysis. Patients were classified as current smokers if they were smoking at least one cigarette per day at the time of hospitalization, never smokers if they have never had smoked or smoked less than 100 piece of cigarettes in their lifetime, former smokers if they have had smoked regularly or occasionally in the past and before hospitalization.

Ethics

The ethics Committee of the Deputy of Research of Tehran University of Medical Sciences reviewed and approved the study protocol (Code: IR.TUMS.REC. 1394.659).

Statistical Analysis

To account for the non-normality of data on the cost (Shapiro Wilk test (p<0.001), Kruskal-Wallis test was used to explore the existence of any significant difference in hospitalization cost among different groups. To consider the skewed distribution of the costs, GLM with gamma and log-link were used. This model has been used as a good method for determining healthcare costs (11, 20, 21). The Modified Park Test confirmed gamma distribution at p= 0.45, and Pregibon Link-Test at p= 0.24 and Pearson Correlation Test at p= 0.58 confirmed the choice of the log link function. The cost ratio (CR) was used to report the association between the dependent and independent variables. Thus, the CR equal to one showed no association between the dependent and independent variables. The CR higher than one indicated a positive relationship between the dependent and independent variables. The age of less than 35 years was used as an offset variable for the study population aged 35 years and above. For the cost data, the original Iranian Rials (IR) was used where during the study period 34,500 Rials were equal to US $1. The association was considered statistically significant at p-value of less than 0.05, and all analyses were done using Stata software version 12.

Results

A total of 1,271 patients with a mean±SD age of 62.5±10.8 years (age range of 35 to 93 years) were included in the study. Of whom, 415 (32.6 %) were diagnosed with LC, 427 (33.6 %) with COPD and 429 (33.8 %) with IHD. Men comprised of 67.6% (n= 860) of all the study patients. Besides, 70.8% of LC, 65% of IHD and 67.2% of COPD patients were among males. The mean±SD LoS was 9.4±8.4 days for current smokers, 7.3 ±5.3 days for former smokers, and 6.02±5.05 days for never smokers. The prevalence of current smoking patients was 33.9% while the prevalence of former and never smokers was 12 and 54.1%, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1

Descriptive Characteristics of the Study Population

Variable Totaln (%) Hospitalization Cost (%)p*
LowMiddleHigh
Sex Male860 (67.6)293 (34.07)249 (28.95)318 (36.98)0.059
Female411 (32.4)131 (31.87)175 (42.58)105 (25.55)
Age (year)35-64719 (56.6)228 (31.71)232 (32.27)259 (36.02)0.039
>65552 (43.4)196 (35.51)192 (34.78)164 (29.71)
Hospital length of stay days Less than 3270 (21.2)192 (71.11)54 (20.00)24 (8.89)0.0001
3-5373 (29.4)178 (47.72)135 (36.19)60 (16.09)
6-9309 (24.3)49 (15.86)165 (53.40)95 (30.74)
> 9319 (25.1)5 (1.57)70 (21.94)244 (76.49)
Smoking Status Never688 (54.1)280 (40.70)254 (36.92)154 (22.38)0.001
Former152 (12)44 (28.95)47 (30.92)61 (40.13)
Current431(33.9)100 (23.20)123 (28.54)208 (48.26)
Type of diseases COPDa 427 (33.6)168 (39.34)177 (41.45)82 (19.20) 0.001
IHDb 429 (33.7)133 (31.00)128 (29.84)168 (39.16)
LCc 415 (32.7)123 (29.64)119 (28.67)173 (41.69)
Type of Hospital Governmental938 (73.8)349 (37.21)305 (32.52)284 (30.28) 0.001
Armed Forces56 (4.4)29 (51.79)19 (33.93)8 (14.29)
Private162 (12.7)11 (6.79)59 (36.42)92 (56.79)
Social Security115 (9)35 (30.43)41 (35.65)39 (33.91)
Type of insurance MSIO1 549 (43.2)187 (34.06)185 (33.70)177 (32.24)0.045
SSIO2 501 (39.4)182 (36.33)167 (33.33)152 (30.34)
AMIO3 56(4.4)22 (39.22)21 (37.50)13 (23.21)
Other128 (10.1)25 (19.53)40 (31.25)63 (49.22)
Noninsurance37 (2.9)8 (21.62)11 (29.73)18 (48.65)

aChronic obstructive pulmonary disease; bIschemic heart diseases; cLung cancer; 1Medical service insurance organization;

2Social security insurance organization; 3Armed Forces insurance organization

aChronic obstructive pulmonary disease; bIschemic heart diseases; cLung cancer; 1Medical service insurance organization; 2Social security insurance organization; 3Armed Forces insurance organization The average cost of hospitalization was 34.5±32.4 million IR. However, the average cost of hospitalization was 45.6±41.8 million IR for current smokers, 34.9±23 million IR for former smokers and 27.6±24.6 million IR for never smokers, respectively. Furthermore, the average cost of hospitalization was 25.3±21 million IR for COPD, 39.1±37.2 million IR for IHD and 39.3 ± 34.7 million IR for LC patients, respectively. The results of GLM with gamma distribution and log link function of costs of hospitalization are presented in Table 2. The adjusted gamma regression model revealed that smoking status, LoS, type of disease and type of hospitals were associated with higher hospitalization cost.
Table 2

Results of GLM with Gamma Distribution and Log Link Function for Hospitalization Costs

Variable Unadjusted IRRAdjusted IRR
Sex Female11
Male1.21 (1.09 -1.35)1.03 (0.95 – 1.12)
Age (year) ≥6511
35-641.12 (1.01 – 1.24)1.06 (0.98-1.14)
Hospital length stay days Less than 311
3-51.42 (1.25-1.61)1.91 (1.71-2.14)
6-92.03 (1.77 – 2.32)2.64 (2.35 – 2.97)
> 93.98 (3.48 – 4.55)5.22 (4.62 – 5.9)
Smoking Status Never11
Former1.26 (1.08 – 1.47)1.24 (1.10 – 1.40)
Current1.65 (1.43 – 1.83)1.35 (1.24 – 1.47)
Type of diseases COPDa 11
IHDb 1.54 (1.37 – 1.74)1.4 (1.23 – 1.95)
LCc 1.55 (1.37 – 1.75)1.65 (1.55- 1.84)
Type of Hospital Armed Forces11
Governmental1.29 (1.03 – 1.66)1.37 (1.05 – 1.80)
Private2.04 (1.54- 2.70)2.17 (1.63 – 2.89)
Social Security1.38 (1.02 – 1.85)1.27 (0.95- 1.70)
Type of insurance AMIO3 11
SSIO2 1.21 (0.93 – 1.57)0.96 (0.73- 1.25)
MSIO1 1.24 (0.96 – 1.61)0.94 (0.72 – 1.23)
Other1.54 (1.14 – 2.07)0.77 (0.57 – 1.04)
Noninsurance1.50 (1.01 – 2.22)0.74 (0.52 – 1.05)

aChronic obstructive pulmonary disease; bIschemic heart diseases; cLung cancer; 1Medical service insurance organization; 2social security insurance organization; 3Armed Forces insurance organization

aChronic obstructive pulmonary disease; bIschemic heart diseases; cLung cancer; 1Medical service insurance organization; 2social security insurance organization; 3Armed Forces insurance organization Compared with never smokers, current and former smokers had 35 and 24% increased costs of hospitalization, respectively (p<0.001). LoS was associated with increased cost of hospitalization. The cost of hospitalization for patients with LoS between 3 and 5 days was 91% compared to those with LoS less than 3 days. In addition, the cost of hospitalization was statistically and significantly associated with type of hospitals (p<0.001). The average cost of hospitalization for private and social security hospitals was respectively 2.17 and 1.27 times higher than the cost of the patients admitted to the Armed Forces hospital.

Discussion

This study investigated the effect of smoking status on the cost of hospitalization from the provider’s perspective in Iran. This study found that the total cost of hospitalization for the current and former smoker categories were respectively 65% and 26% higher in unadjusted model and 35% and 24% in the adjusted model higher than for the never smoker category of patients. These findings are in line with other studies that have reported increased costs in current and former smoker patients compared to never smokers (2, 11, 14, 15, 22). A study in Germany reported a positive association between history of smoking, and direct and indirect costs. The total annual costs were more than 20% and 35% higher for current and former smokers, respectively, compared with never smokers (11). Similarly, another study also found that costs for current and former smokers were significantly higher compared with never smokers. The monthly cost of hospitalization for current smokers was $400 higher than the costs for never smokers. However, the cost for former smokers was $273 higher than the costs for never smokers (14). In our study, the difference in cost of hospitalization between current and never smokers was 17.9 million IR, whereas the difference between former smokers and never smokers was 7.2 million IR. Another factor affecting the cost of hospitalization was the LoS. Our findings revealed that the cost of hospitalization for patients with more than 9 days LoS was 5.2 times higher compared to those with LoS less than 3 days. The average LoS for current and former smokers was 9.4±8.4 days and 7.3±5.3 days, respectively, while for never smokers it was 6.02±5.05 days. This finding are consistent with the reports of previous studies in Japan (15) and USA (10) and Iran (22). Moreover, Izumi et al. found that the hospitalization rate of current plus former smokers was 26% (in males) and 22% (in females) higher than in never smokers (15). Overall, the hospitalization rate for current and former smokers was respectively 30% and 20% higher than in never smokers. A study in the United States on medical services utilization by smokers during 1999 to 2004 indicated that current smokers were more likely to be hospitalized than never smokers. Besides, outpatient visits for current smokers was four times higher than never smokers (9). Our study did not find any statistically significant relationship between age and sex and cost of hospitalization, which is consistent with findings of another study (23). However, there was a positive relationship between being male and age 35-64 years and cost of hospitalization. These findings can be explained by the fact that the prevalence of smoking for males is higher compared to the prevalence among females (42.8% vs. 15.3% or for more patients in the age category of 35-64 years compared to those over the age of 64 years (36.7% vs. 30.2%). There are, however, some limitations to our study. This study was carried out in Tehran, so the generalizability of the findings is limited. Besides, the effect of severity of diseases on the cost of hospitalization was not adjusted because data for these factors were not available in the medical records of the patients. The self-reported smoking status of the patients through the telephone survey might have led to social desirability bias and under estimation of the prevalence of current and former smoking behavior of the patients. Furthermore, total costs of hospitalization might not reflect the actual hospital cost of smoking and did not include government subsidies to hospital services and all out of pocket payments by the patients. Indirect medical costs such as transportation and food costs and other indirect costs associated with loss of productivity due to disability and mortality were not included in the study as measuring these costs was beyond the scope of the study.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that considerable costs of hospitalizations are attributable to smoking in Iran. The financial consequences of smoking on health system, especially on hospitals, and on the society as a whole are substantial. However, further studies are needed to investigate the impact of smoking status on healthcare utilization, physicians’ visits, pharmaceutical costs and LoS. The current findings suggest the need for strong preventive measures for smoking and its negative economic consequences.

Acknowledgments

This article was part of a PhD thesis in Health Economics by Satar Rezaei, which was funded and supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  20 in total

Review 1.  The financial impact of smoking on health-related costs: a review of the literature.

Authors:  W Max
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2001 May-Jun

Review 2.  Methods for analyzing health care utilization and costs.

Authors:  P Diehr; D Yanez; A Ash; M Hornbrook; D Y Lin
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 3.  Smoking and absence from work: systematic review and meta-analysis of occupational studies.

Authors:  Stephen F Weng; Shehzad Ali; Jo Leonardi-Bee
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Short term effects of cigarette smoking on hospitalisation and associated lost workdays in a young healthy population.

Authors:  A S Robbins; V P Fonseca; S Y Chao; G A Coil; N S Bell; P J Amoroso
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Smoking status and health care costs in the perioperative period: a population-based study.

Authors:  David O Warner; Bijan J Borah; James Moriarty; Darrell R Schroeder; Yu Shi; Nilay D Shah
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Trends in quality-adjusted life-years lost contributed by smoking and obesity.

Authors:  Haomiao Jia; Erica I Lubetkin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis.

Authors:  Robert Beaglehole; Ruth Bonita; Richard Horton; Cary Adams; George Alleyne; Perviz Asaria; Vanessa Baugh; Henk Bekedam; Nils Billo; Sally Casswell; Michele Cecchini; Ruth Colagiuri; Stephen Colagiuri; Tea Collins; Shah Ebrahim; Michael Engelgau; Gauden Galea; Thomas Gaziano; Robert Geneau; Andy Haines; James Hospedales; Prabhat Jha; Ann Keeling; Stephen Leeder; Paul Lincoln; Martin McKee; Judith Mackay; Roger Magnusson; Rob Moodie; Modi Mwatsama; Sania Nishtar; Bo Norrving; David Patterson; Peter Piot; Johanna Ralston; Manju Rani; K Srinath Reddy; Franco Sassi; Nick Sheron; David Stuckler; Il Suh; Julie Torode; Cherian Varghese; Judith Watt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The impact of smoking and quitting on health care use.

Authors:  E H Wagner; S J Curry; L Grothaus; K W Saunders; C M McBride
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-09-11

9.  The costs of smoking in Vietnam: the case of inpatient care.

Authors:  Hana Ross; Dang Vu Trung; Vu Xuan Phu
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Smoking-attributable morbidity: acute care hospital diagnoses and days of treatment in Canada, 2002.

Authors:  Dolly Baliunas; Jayadeep Patra; Jürgen Rehm; Svetlana Popova; Benjamin Taylor
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  3 in total

1.  Differences in medical costs among urban lung cancer patients with different health insurance schemes: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yichen Li; Yong Yang; Jia Yuan; Lieyu Huang; Yong Ma; Xuefeng Shi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  Metabolic Differences between Ex-Smokers and Nonsmokers: A Metabolomic Analysis.

Authors:  Lirong Liang; Lin Feng; Long Zhou; Shuilian Chu; Di Zhang; Hang Jin; Jiachen Li; Liancheng Zhao; Zhaohui Tong
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 3.822

3.  Length of Hospital Stay, Hospitalization Costs, and Their Drivers in Adults with Diabetes in the Romanian Public Hospital System.

Authors:  Cornelia Bala; Adriana Rusu; Dana Ciobanu; Gabriela Roman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 4.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.