| Literature DB >> 29445412 |
Shuai Yan1,2, Yin-Zi Yue1, Xiao-Peng Wang1, Hong-Li Dong1, Shu-Guang Zhen1, Ben-Sheng Wu1, Hai-Hua Qian3.
Abstract
Traditional Chinese medicine was reported to have good effects in treating ss="Disease">functional constipation. This work attempted to prove the effects of aqueous extracts of HerbaEntities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29445412 PMCID: PMC5763204 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6236904
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Targeted genes and internal parameter of primer.
| Amplified products | Sizes | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| c-Kit | 212 bp | Downstream: 5′-CTGGCTGCCAA ATCTCTGTGAA-3′ |
| Upstream: 5′-AGATGACGAGCTGGCTCTGGA-3′ | ||
| SCF | 119 bp | Downstream: 5′-GGAGATGGCAGTTGTGACTA-3′ |
| Upstream: 5′-CATGCTTTAAGGCCTTTGTCACGA-3′ | ||
| PI3K | 159 bp | Downstream: 5′-TGGGCACAGGGAAGACAA-3′ |
| Upstream: 5′-ACCAGTTGGCTCGGCATA-3′ | ||
| GAPDH | 252 bp | Downstream: 5′-CAGGATTCCATACCCAAG-3′ |
| Upstream: 5′-ACACTGTGCCCATCTACG-3′ |
Figure 1Representative HPLC chromatograms of (Peak 1) echinacoside and (Peak 2) verbascoside.
Figure 2Effects of AEHC on body and feeding behavior in loperamide-induced constipated rats. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. n = 12. P < 0.01 versus Group A.
Figure 3Effects of AEHC on number and moisture content in loperamide-induced constipated rats. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. n = 12. P < 0.05 versus Group A; △P < 0.05 versus Group B.
Figure 4Effect of AEHC on small intestinal transit rate in loperamide-induced constipation rats. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. n = 12. P < 0.01 versus Group A; △P < 0.05 versus Group B.
Figure 5AEHC partially enhances colonic motility index function. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. n = 12. P < 0.01 versus Group A; △P < 0.05 versus Group B.
Figure 6Histological findings in the colon with hematoxylin and eosin staining (n = 12, 100x).
Figure 7AEHC partially enhances colonic motility index function. Bars represent the mean ± SEM. n = 12. P < 0.01 versus Group A; △P < 0.05 versus Group B.
Figure 8Immunohistochemical staining of the ICC by c-kit (n = 12, 200x).
Figure 9AEHC ameliorated the function of ICC. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. n = 8. P < 0.01 versus Group A; △P < 0.05 versus Group B.
Figure 10Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of c-kit, SCF, and PI3K messenger RNA expression. The figure shows the representative result from repeated experiments (n = 8). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Compared with Group A, P < 0.01; compared with Group B, △P < 0.05.