Literature DB >> 29445320

A combined test for a generalized treatment effect in clinical trials with a time-to-event outcome.

Patrick Royston1.   

Abstract

Most randomized controlled trials with a time-to-event outcome are designed and analyzed assuming proportional hazards of the treatment effect. The sample-size calculation is based on a log-rank test or the equivalent Cox test. Nonproportional hazards are seen increasingly in trials and are recognized as a potential threat to the power of the log-rank test. To address the issue, Royston and Parmar (2016, BMC Medical Research Methodology 16: 16) devised a new "combined test" of the global null hypothesis of identical survival curves in each trial arm. The test, which combines the conventional Cox test with a new formulation, is based on the maximal standardized difference in restricted mean survival time (rmst) between the arms. The test statistic is based on evaluations of rmst over several preselected time points. The combined test involves the minimum p-value across the Cox and rmst-based tests, appropriately standardized to have the correct null distribution. In this article, I outline the combined test and introduce a command, stctest, that implements the combined test. I point the way to additional tools currently under development for power and sample-size calculation for the combined test.

Entities:  

Keywords:  flexible parametric model; hypothesis testing; jackknife; randomized controlled trial; restricted mean survival time; st0479; stctest; time-to-event outcome; treatment effect

Year:  2017        PMID: 29445320      PMCID: PMC5808831     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stata J        ISSN: 1536-867X            Impact factor:   2.637


  5 in total

1.  Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Mahesh K B Parmar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Regression analysis of restricted mean survival time based on pseudo-observations.

Authors:  Per Kragh Andersen; Mette Gerster Hansen; John P Klein
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 3.  Comparison of Treatment Effects Measured by the Hazard Ratio and by the Ratio of Restricted Mean Survival Times in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Ludovic Trinquart; Justine Jacot; Sarah C Conner; Raphaël Porcher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Penicillin to prevent recurrent leg cellulitis.

Authors:  Kim S Thomas; Angela M Crook; Andrew J Nunn; Katharine A Foster; James M Mason; Joanne R Chalmers; Ibrahim S Nasr; Richard J Brindle; John English; Sarah K Meredith; Nicholas J Reynolds; David de Berker; Peter S Mortimer; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Mahesh K B Parmar
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Community-based interventions to prevent serious complications following spinal cord injury in Bangladesh: the CIVIC trial statistical analysis plan.

Authors:  Robert D Herbert; Lisa A Harvey; Mohammad S Hossain; Md Shofiqul Islam; Qiang Li; Laurent Billot
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Combined test versus logrank/Cox test in 50 randomised trials.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Babak Choodari-Oskooei; Mahesh K B Parmar; Jennifer K Rogers
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 3.  Which test for crossing survival curves? A user's guideline.

Authors:  Ina Dormuth; Tiantian Liu; Jin Xu; Menggang Yu; Markus Pauly; Marc Ditzhaus
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Examining evidence of time-dependent treatment effects: an illustration using regression methods.

Authors:  Kim M Jachno; Stephane Heritier; Robyn L Woods; Suzanne Mahady; Andrew Chan; Andrew Tonkin; Anne Murray; John J McNeil; Rory Wolfe
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 2.728

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.