| Literature DB >> 29445257 |
Sébastien Boutin1,2, Martin Depner3, Mirjam Stahl2,4,5, Simon Y Graeber2,4,5, Susanne A Dittrich2,5,6, Antje Legatzki3, Erika von Mutius3, Marcus Mall2,4,5, Alexander H Dalpke1,2.
Abstract
A genuine microbiota resides in the lungs which emanates from the colonization by the oropharyngeal microbiota. Changes in the oropharyngeal microbiota might be the source of dysbiosis observed in the lower airways in patients suffering from asthma or cystic fibrosis (CF). To examine this hypothesis, we compared the throat microbiota from healthy children (n = 62) and that from children with asthma (n = 27) and CF (n = 57) aged 6 to 12 years using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Our results show high levels of similarities between healthy controls and children with asthma and CF revealing the existence of a core microbiome represented by Prevotella, Streptococcus, Neisseria, Veillonella, and Haemophilus. However, in CF, the global diversity, the bacterial load, and abundances of 53 OTUs were significantly reduced, whereas abundances of 6 OTUs representing opportunistic pathogens such as Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus were increased compared to those in healthy controls controls and asthmatics. Our data reveal a core microbiome in the throat of healthy children that persists in asthma and CF indicating shared host regulation favoring growth of commensals. Furthermore, we provide evidence for dysbiosis with a decrease in diversity and biomass associated with the presence of known pathogens consistent with impaired host defense in children with CF.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29445257 PMCID: PMC5763206 DOI: 10.1155/2017/5047403
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Demographic description of the cohort.
| Control | Asthma | CF | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 62 | 27 | 57 |
| Male/female | 28/34 | 21/6 | 46/11 |
| Age in years (min–max) | 10.10 (8–12) | 10.00 (8–12) | 10.61 (6–12) |
| FEV1 in L (min–max) | 1.99 (1.15–3.18) | 1.83 (1.26–2.35) | 1.92 (0.88–3.34) |
| FEV1 | −0.44 ± 1.08 | −0.43 ± 0.79 | −1.78 ± 1.37 |
| FVC in L (min–max) | 2.36 (1.44–3.87) | 2.25 (1.53–3.34) | 2.40 (1.04–3.86) |
| FVC | −0.17 ± 0.79 | 0.12 ± 0.93 | −1.42 ± 1.32 |
| % antibiotic use within 4 weeks prior to sampling | 1.61 | 3.70 | 45.61 |
FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC: forced vital capacity. z-scores were calculated following the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) equation from 2012 [44].
Figure 1Structure of the throat microbiome of healthy children, children with asthma, and children with CF. (a) Microbial compositions of the whole microbiota were visualized by PCoA. The lines represent the 95% confidence interval assuming a multivariate t-distribution (full lines) or a multivariate normal distribution (dashed lines). (b) The presence/absence of the 88 most abundant bacteria (>0.1% relative abundance) was compared between the three groups and is displayed as a Venn diagram. (c) Relative abundance of the 55 most abundant OTUs in each sample clustered according to the cohorts. The mock community was an assembly of DNA from 20 known species with equimolar ribosomal RNA operon counts (100,000 copies per organism per μL). (d) Correlation plots of the major OTUs with the two first axes of the PCoA.
Figure 2Diversity and biomass are decreased in the oropharyngeal microbiome of children with CF. (a) α-Diversity was assessed by the nonparametric Shannon index. (b) Richness was estimated by the Chao index. (c) Evenness was derived from a Shannon index-based measure of evenness. (d) Global biomass measured as the number of 16S rRNA gene copies. Statistical significance was calculated by the Wilcoxon test. ∗∗∗ p value < 0.001.
Figure 3Differences in OTU abundance between healthy children, children with asthma, and children with CF. Differential abundance of each OTU was tested via a method based on the negative binomial distribution and is represented in a heatmap for the significantly differentially abundant OTU. Mean abundance was normalized within each OTU to the maximal values (normalized valueOTU1 = (relative abundanceOTU1)/maximum (relative abundanceOTU1)). The color code is from white (minimal abundance: 0) to red (maximal abundance: 1). Fold changes between the groups and standard errors are displayed in (b). Red dots indicate significant differences after correction for multiple testing. OTUs are named following their genus classification and colored following their phylum classification.