| Literature DB >> 29445070 |
Pasqualino Loi1, Cesare Galli2, Giovanna Lazzari2, Kazutsugu Matsukawa3, Josef Fulka4, Frank Goeritz5, Thomas B Hildebrandt5.
Abstract
Here we report in vitro and term development of sheep embryos after the inner cell mass (ICM) from one set of sheep blastocysts were injected into the trophoblast vesicles of another set. We also observed successful in vitro development of chimeric blastocysts made from sheep trophoblast vesicles injected with bovine ICM. First, we dissected ICMs from 35 sheep blastocysts using a stainless steel microblade and injected them into 29 re-expanded sheep trophoblastic vesicles. Of the 25 successfully micromanipulated trophoblastic vesicles, 15 (51.7%) re-expanded normally and showed proper ICM integration. The seven most well reconstructed embryos were transferred for development to term. Three ewes receiving manipulated blastocysts were pregnant at day 45 (42.8%), and all delivered normal offspring (singletons, two females and one male, average weight: 3.54 ± 0.358 kg). Next, we monitored in vitro development of sheep trophoblasts injected with bovine ICMs. Of 17 injected trophoblastic vesicles, 10 (58.8%) re-expanded after 4 h in culture, and four (40%) exhibited integrated bovine ICM. Our results indicate that ICM/trophoblast exchange is feasible, allowing full term development with satisfactory lambing rate. Therefore, ICM exchange is a promising approach for endangered species conservation.Entities:
Keywords: Blastocysts; Bovine; In vitro fertilization; Inner cell mass exchange; Sheep
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29445070 PMCID: PMC5902907 DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2017-109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Reprod Dev ISSN: 0916-8818 Impact factor: 2.214
Fig. 1.a) High-quality blastocyst. b) Low-quality blastocysts. c) Hoechst 33342 staining of ad-embryonic pole. d) Integration of inner cell mass (ICM) at 90° relative to the Hoechst 33342 mark (out of focus in the center). Scale bar = 100 μm.
Fig. 2.a) Dissecting the ICM. b) ICM injection. c) Injected trophoblastic vesicle. d) Re-expanded blastocyst. Arrows indicate ICM.
Fig. 3.a) ICM integration into injected trophoblastic vesicle. b) Failed integration of ICM into trophoblastic vesicle.
In vitro and in vivo development of reconstructed sheep blastocysts following inner cell mass (ICM)/trophoblast exchange
| Injected trophoblasts (with ICMs) | Expanded (% over total injected trophoblasts) | ICM integration (% over total injected trophoblasts) | Transferred | Pregnancies on day 30 | Offspring | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manipulated blastocyst | ||||||
| 35 | 29 (82.8%) | 25 (86.2%) | 15 (51.7%) | 7 (4 ewes) | 3 (42.8%) | 3 (42.8%) * |
| Control blastocysts | ||||||
| 21 | – | – | – | 21 (11 ewes) | 11 (52.3%) | 11 (52.3%) * |
* No significant differences (P = 0.66) were found between groups.
Birth weight and growth rate of Sarda lambs delivered following ICM/trophoblast exchange compared with control
| Weight at birth | Weight at 30 days | Weight at 90 days | Weight at 180 days | Weight at 350 days | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female offspring # 1 | 3.3 | 8.5 | 15.6 | 26.7 | 32.1 |
| Female offspring # 2 | 3.5 | 7.9 | 14.0 | 24.2 | 30.1 |
| Average weight of control singleton female lambs | 3.6 | 8.8 | 16.0 | 27.8 | 32.5 |
| Male offspring | 3.7 | 8.8 | 16.7 | 33.8 | 43.9 |
| Average weight of control singleton male lambs | 3.9 | 10.4 | 17.5 | 35.3 | 44.6 |
Development in vitro of sheep trophoblast vesicles injected with bovine ICMs
| Number of manipulated bovine blastocysts | Number of sheep trophoblastic vesicles injected with bovine ICMs | Number and percentage of re-expanded trophoblasts | Number and percentage of ICM integration into trophoblasts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | 17 | 10 (58.8%) | 4 (40%) |