Literature DB >> 29444853

Interprofessional Teamwork Innovation Model (ITIM) to promote communication and patient-centred, coordinated care.

Jing Li1, Preetham Talari2, Andrew Kelly1, Barbara Latham3, Sherri Dotson4, Kim Manning5, Lisa Thornsberry4, Colleen Swartz4, Mark V Williams1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations and the need to accelerate redesign of delivery models to be team-based and patient-centred, professional silos and cultural and structural barriers that inhibit working together and communicating effectively still predominate in the hospital setting. Aiming to improve team-based rounding, we developed, implemented and evaluated the Interprofessional Teamwork Innovation Model (ITIM).
METHODS: This quality improvement (QI) study was conducted at an academic medical centre. We followed the system's QI framework, FOCUS-PDSA, with Lean as guiding principles. Primary outcomes included 30-day all-cause same-hospital readmissions and 30-day emergency department (ED) visits. The intervention group consisted of patients receiving care on two hospitalist ITIM teams, and patients receiving care from other hospitalist teams were matched with a control group. Outcomes were assessed using difference-in-difference analysis.
RESULTS: Team members reported enhanced communication and overall time savings. In multivariate modelling, patients discharged from hospitalist teams using the ITIM approach were associated with reduced 30-day same-hospital readmissions with an estimated point OR of 0.56 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.92), but there was no impact on 30-day same-hospital ED visits. Difference-in-difference analysis showed that ITIM was not associated with changes in average total direct costs nor average cost per patient day, after adjusting for all other covariates in the models, despite the addition of staff resources in the ITIM model.
CONCLUSION: The ITIM approach facilitates a collaborative environment in which patients and their family caregivers, physicians, nurses, pharmacists, case managers and others work and share in the process of care. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; continuous quality improvement; hospital medicine; patient-centred Care; teamwork

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29444853     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  11 in total

1.  A scoping review of new implementations of interprofessional bedside rounding models to improve teamwork, care, and outcomes in hospitals.

Authors:  Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney; Frances Chu; Andrew A White; G Randy Smith; Kyla Woodward; Danielle C Lavallee; Rachel Marie E Salas; Genevieve Beaird; Mayumi A Willgerodt; Deborah Dang; John M Dent; Elizabeth Ibby Tanner; Nicole Summerside; Brenda K Zierler; Kevin D O'Brien; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 2.338

2.  Bedside Nurses' Perceptions of Effective Nurse-Physician Communication in General Medical Units: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Hirotaka Kato; Jessica M Clouser; Preetham Talari; Nikita L Vundi; Akosua K Adu; Kishore Karri; Kathy B Isaacs; Mark V Williams; Romil Chadha; Jing Li
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Revisiting Provider Communication to Support Team Cohesiveness: Implications for Practice, Provider Burnout, and Technology Application in Primary Care Settings.

Authors:  Allison A Norful; Yun He; Adam Rosenfeld; Cilgy M Abraham; Bernard Chang
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.149

Review 4.  Framework for patient, family-centred care within an Australian Community Hospital: development and description.

Authors:  Thuy Frakking; Suzanne Michaels; Jane Orbell-Smith; Lance Le Ray
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2020-04

5.  Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade.

Authors:  Martina Buljac-Samardzic; Kirti D Doekhie; Jeroen D H van Wijngaarden
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2020-01-08

6.  Redesigning the Clinical Learning Environment to Improve Interprofessional Care and Education: Multi-Method Program Evaluation of the iPACE Pilot Unit.

Authors:  Sarah Hallen; Thomas Van der Kloot; Christyna McCormack; Paul K J Han; Frances L Lucas; Lisbeth Wierda; Daniel Meyer; Kalli Varaklis; Robert Bing-You
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-10

7.  Google Glass-Supported Cooperative Training for Health Professionals: A Case Study Based on Using Remote Desktop Virtual Support.

Authors:  Hyoseok Yoon; Sun Kyung Kim; Youngho Lee; Jongmyung Choi
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-06-17

8.  How the Integration of Telehealth and Coordinated Care Approaches Impact Health Care Service Organization Structure and Ethos: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Rosemary Davidson; David Ian Barrett; Lorna Rixon; Stanton Newman
Journal:  JMIR Nurs       Date:  2020-10-09

9.  BOOSTing patient mobility and function on a general medical unit by enhancing interprofessional care.

Authors:  A M Johnson; J Kuperstein; R Hogg Graham; P Talari; A Kelly; E E Dupont-Versteegden
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Acute care nurses' perceptions of leadership, teamwork, turnover intention and patient safety - a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Shahram Zaheer; Liane Ginsburg; Hannah J Wong; Kelly Thomson; Lorna Bain; Zaev Wulffhart
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2021-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.