Literature DB >> 29444759

Current management of pelvic organ prolapse in aging women: EMAS clinical guide.

Andrea Giannini1, Eleonora Russo1, Antonio Cano2, Peter Chedraui3, Dimitrios G Goulis4, Irene Lambrinoudaki5, Patrice Lopes6, Gita Mishra7, Alfred Mueck8, Margaret Rees9, Levent M Senturk10, John C Stevenson11, Petra Stute12, Pauliina Tuomikoski13, Tommaso Simoncini14.   

Abstract

Management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common and challenging task. Nowadays older women are more active than they were in the past, and the development of POP disrupts quality of life and impairs social and personal activities. The menopausal transition is a time of vulnerability, during which many women start experiencing symptoms and signs of POP. The role of hormonal changes or of hormonal therapies in influencing the development or progression of POP has been explored extensively. The management of POP requires considerable clinical skills. Correct diagnosis and characterization of the prolapse and an identification of the individual woman's most bothersome symptoms are the hallmark of appropriate initial management. Therapy is multimodal and often multidisciplinary, and requires a competence in pelvic medicine and surgery. The integration of hormonal, non-hormonal and surgical strategies is important and needs to be adjusted to changing circumstances on an individualized basis. When surgery is required, optimal management requires clinicians who are familiar with the advantages and disadvantages of all the available strategies and who are able to use these strategies in a tailored manner. Complex cases should be sent to specialist referral centers. Management of POP should be integrated into the practice of healthcare professionals dealing in menopause.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Management; Pelvic organ prolapse; Urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29444759     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  4 in total

1.  Effectiveness of ring pessaries versus vaginal hysterectomy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. A cohort study.

Authors:  Alessio Miceli; José-Luis Dueñas-Diez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Is it safe and effective to maintain the vaginal pessary without removing it for 2 consecutive years?

Authors:  Alessio Miceli; Manuel Fernández-Sánchez; Juan Polo-Padillo; José-Luis Dueñas-Díez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Global burden and trends of pelvic organ prolapse associated with aging women: An observational trend study from 1990 to 2019.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Yingying Chen; Xiaoran Zhu; Tian Wang; Mei Li; Yibao Huang; Liru Xue; Qingqing Zhu; Xiaofan Gao; Mingfu Wu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-15

4.  Modified Lefort partial colpocleisis.

Authors:  Hongtao Lv; Fengnian Rong
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.894

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.