Correction to: Patients and surgeons provide endorsement of core domains for total joint replacement clinical trials.

CORRECTION: Unfortunately, after publication of this article [1], it was noticed that Table 2 was not correctly formatted during the production process. The corrected Table 2 can be seen below and the original article has been updated to match.

Correction

Unfortunately, after publication of this article [1], it was noticed that Table 2 was not correctly formatted during the production process. The corrected Table 2 can be seen below and the original article has been updated to match.

Table 2

Domain ratings between patients and surgeons

	Overall(N = 1316)	Patients(n = 1295)	Surgeons(n = 21)	p Value
Core domains
Joint pain	9 (8–9)	9 (8–9)	9 (7–9)	0.75
Function or functional ability	9 (8–9)	9 (8–9)	8 (7–9)	0.01
Patient satisfaction	9 (8–9)	9 (8–9)	8 (8–9)	0.02
Revision surgery	8 (5–9)	8 (5–9)	8 (7–8)	0.41
Adverse events	8 (7–9)	8 (7–9)	7 (6–9)	0.23
Death	9 (6–9)	9 (6–9)	9 (7–9)	0.47
Additional domains for consideration	Overall(N = 1316)	Patients(n = 1295)	Surgeons(n = 21)	p Value
Cost	7 (5–8)	7 (5–8)	6 (5–6)	0.01
Patient participation in work and social activities	8 (6–9)	8 (6–9)	8 (6–8)	0.26

Each domain was rated on a 1–9 scale, with 1–3 indicating limited or no importance for patients, 4–6 being important but not critical, and 7–9 being critical

Bold text signifies results that were statistically significant