Literature DB >> 29444571

Factors Affecting Mercury Stable Isotopic Distribution in Piscivorous Fish of the Laurentian Great Lakes.

Ryan F Lepak1, Sarah E Janssen1, Runsheng Yin2, David P Krabbenhoft1, Jacob M Ogorek1, John F DeWild1, Michael T Tate1, Thomas M Holsen3, James P Hurley4.   

Abstract

Identifying the sources of methylmercury (MeHg) and tracing the transformations of mercury (Hg) in the aquatic food web are important components of effective strategies for managing current and legacy Hg sources. In our previous work, we measured stable isotopes of Hg (δ202Hg, Δ199Hg, and Δ200Hg) in the Laurentian Great Lakes and estimated source contributions of Hg to bottom sediment. Here, we identify isotopically distinct Hg signatures for Great Lakes trout ( Salvelinus namaycush) and walleye ( Sander vitreus), driven by both food-web and water-quality characteristics. Fish contain high values for odd-isotope mass independent fractionation (MIF) with averages ranging from 2.50 (western Lake Erie) to 6.18‰ (Lake Superior) in Δ199Hg. The large range in odd-MIF reflects variability in the depth of the euphotic zone, where Hg is most likely incorporated into the food web. Even-isotope MIF (Δ200Hg), a potential tracer for Hg from precipitation, appears both disconnected from lake sedimentary sources and comparable in fish among the five lakes. We suggest that similar to the open ocean, water-column methylation also occurs in the Great Lakes, possibly transforming recently deposited atmospheric Hg deposition. We conclude that the degree of photochemical processing of Hg is controlled by phytoplankton uptake rather than by dissolved organic carbon quantity among lakes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29444571     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Resolving Atmospheric Mercury Loading and Source Trends from Isotopic Records of Remote North American Lake Sediments.

Authors:  Ryan F Lepak; Sarah E Janssen; Daniel R Engstrom; David P Krabbenhoft; Michael T Tate; Runsheng Yin; William F Fitzgerald; Sonia A Nagorski; James P Hurley
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Using carbon, nitrogen, and mercury isotope values to distinguish mercury sources to Alaskan lake trout.

Authors:  Ryan F Lepak; Jacob M Ogorek; Krista K Bartz; Sarah E Janssen; Michael T Tate; Yin Runsheng; James P Hurley; Daniel B Young; Collin A Eagles-Smith; David P Krabbenhoft
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2022-03-21

Review 3.  Internal Dynamics and Metabolism of Mercury in Biota: A Review of Insights from Mercury Stable Isotopes.

Authors:  Mi-Ling Li; Sae Yun Kwon; Brett A Poulin; Martin Tsz-Ki Tsui; Laura C Motta; Moonkyoung Cho
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-19       Impact factor: 11.357

4.  Examining historical mercury sources in the Saint Louis River estuary: How legacy contamination influences biological mercury levels in Great Lakes coastal regions.

Authors:  Sarah E Janssen; Joel C Hoffman; Ryan F Lepak; David P Krabbenhoft; David Walters; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Greg Peterson; Jacob M Ogorek; John F DeWild; Anne Cotter; Mark Pearson; Michael T Tate; Roger B Yeardley; Marc A Mills
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 10.753

5.  Mercury source changes and food web shifts alter contamination signatures of predatory fish from Lake Michigan.

Authors:  Ryan F Lepak; Joel C Hoffman; Sarah E Janssen; David P Krabbenhoft; Jacob M Ogorek; John F DeWild; Michael T Tate; Christopher L Babiarz; Runsheng Yin; Elizabeth W Murphy; Daniel R Engstrom; James P Hurley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Distribution and Transformation of Mercury in Subtropical Wild-Caught Seafood from the Southern Taiwan Strait.

Authors:  Lumin Sun; Weijia Chen; Dongxing Yuan; Liang Zhou; Changyi Lu; Yingjie Zheng
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.