OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has an important role in bridging patients to lung transplantation. In this study, we present our experience with pretransplant ECMO during the last 7 years and investigate its impact on graft outcomes. METHODS: Records of all lung-transplanted patients at our institution between January 2010 and April 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Graft survival was compared between patients who required pretransplant ECMO (pre-Tx ECMO+) and patients who did not (pre-Tx ECMO-). Risk factors for in-hospital mortality and graft survival were identified using a binary logistic regression and the Cox regression analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Among the 917 patients transplanted during the study period, 68 (7%) required ECMO as a bridge to transplantation [awake strategy, n = 57 (84%) patients]. Median bridging time was 9 days. Among pre-Tx ECMO+ patients, the need for haemodialysis at any point during bridging emerged as an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 7.79, 95% confidence interval 1.21-50.24; P = 0.031). Although in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in pre-Tx ECMO+ versus pre-Tx ECMO- patients (15% vs 5%, P = 0.003), overall graft survival did not differ between groups (79% vs 90% and 61% vs 68% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, P = 0.13). Pretransplant ECMO did not emerge as a risk factor for graft survival in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: If applied in selected patients in a high-volume centre, pretransplant ECMO as a bridge to transplantation results in impaired, but still high in-hospital, survival and does not impact graft survival.
OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has an important role in bridging patients to lung transplantation. In this study, we present our experience with pretransplant ECMO during the last 7 years and investigate its impact on graft outcomes. METHODS: Records of all lung-transplanted patients at our institution between January 2010 and April 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Graft survival was compared between patients who required pretransplant ECMO (pre-Tx ECMO+) and patients who did not (pre-Tx ECMO-). Risk factors for in-hospital mortality and graft survival were identified using a binary logistic regression and the Cox regression analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Among the 917 patients transplanted during the study period, 68 (7%) required ECMO as a bridge to transplantation [awake strategy, n = 57 (84%) patients]. Median bridging time was 9 days. Among pre-Tx ECMO+ patients, the need for haemodialysis at any point during bridging emerged as an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 7.79, 95% confidence interval 1.21-50.24; P = 0.031). Although in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in pre-Tx ECMO+ versus pre-Tx ECMO- patients (15% vs 5%, P = 0.003), overall graft survival did not differ between groups (79% vs 90% and 61% vs 68% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, P = 0.13). Pretransplant ECMO did not emerge as a risk factor for graft survival in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: If applied in selected patients in a high-volume centre, pretransplant ECMO as a bridge to transplantation results in impaired, but still high in-hospital, survival and does not impact graft survival.