Literature DB >> 29443407

Implanted vascular access device options: a focused review on safety and outcomes.

Merilda O Blanco-Guzman1.   

Abstract

Implantable vascular access devices are frequently used in patients who have poor peripheral venous access. These devices can be partially implanted as tunneled and nontunneled central catheters, or they can be fully implanted as ports. Compared with long-term catheters, implanted ports have lower infection rates and improved perceptions of quality of life, but complications still occur in 2% to 18% of patients, frequently requiring removal of the device. Since the conception of implantable vascular access device ports, numerous advances in port design, materials, and techniques for implantation and care have been developed with the goal of overcoming frequent complications. We review the evidence related to these advances and their effect on the safety profile and complications of implantable vascular access device ports.
© 2018 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29443407     DOI: 10.1111/trf.14503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  2 in total

1.  ECO-SEOM-SEEO safety recommendations guideline for cancer patients receiving intravenous therapy.

Authors:  I Magallón-Pedrera; J Pérez-Altozano; J A Virizuela Echaburu; C Beato-Zambrano; P Borrega-García; J C de la Torre-Montero
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) versus totally implantable venous-access ports in pediatric oncology patients, a single center study.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Yumei Li; Nannan Zhu; Yanfang Li; Jinqiu Fu; Jing Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.