Literature DB >> 29443317

Medical decisions are not just about the facts: What a life-threatening virus can teach us about empathy, psychology, and the practice of neurology.

Norman J Kachuck1.   

Abstract

Getting the facts about risk and benefit is a critical part of medical decision-making. But when doctors and patients disagree on what is reasonable risk, it takes more than a grasp of the data to establish the way forward. Our competence as physician-scientists relies on our ability to master the mechanics and information flow of our specialty. But we physicians, curious amalgams of scientists, scholars, researchers, and healers, should be aware of how we respond to the uniqueness of each of our physician-patient relationships, and be willing to explore ways in which the psychological and interpersonal dynamics influence the ethical, medically correct choices we pursue in them.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 29443317      PMCID: PMC5798207          DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0b013e31825a7848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract        ISSN: 2163-0402


  14 in total

1.  Registries, research, and regrets: is the FDA's post-marketing REMS process not adequately protecting patients?

Authors:  Norman J Kachuck
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 2.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Balancing risk and reward: the question of natalizumab.

Authors:  Stephen L Hauser; S Claiborne Johnston
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  The medical profession as a moral community.

Authors:  E D Pellegrino
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun

5.  Building a better physician--the case for the new MCAT.

Authors:  Robert M Kaplan; Jason M Satterfield; Raynard S Kington
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Patient autonomy and the challenge of clinical uncertainty.

Authors:  Mark Parascandola; Jennifer Hawkins; Marion Danis
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2002-09

Review 7.  Informed shared decision making in multiple sclerosis--inevitable or impossible?

Authors:  C Heesen; J Kasper; S Köpke; T Richter; J Segal; I Mühlhauser
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 3.181

8.  Risk perception in natalizumab-treated multiple sclerosis patients and their neurologists.

Authors:  Christoph Heesen; Ingo Kleiter; Franziska Nguyen; Nina Schäffler; Jürgen Kasper; Sascha Köpke; Wolfgang Gaissmaier
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 6.312

9.  The moral foundation of the clinical duties of care: needs, duties and human rights.

Authors:  L Doyal
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.898

10.  When neurologist and patient disagree on reasonable risk: new challenges in prescribing for patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Norman J Kachuck
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.570

View more
  1 in total

1.  Medical decisions are not just about facts: What a life-threatening virus can teach us about empathy, psychology, and the practice of neurology.

Authors:  Nitin K Sethi
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2012-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.