| Literature DB >> 29442257 |
Mingchao Ma1,2, Jing Zhou1,3, Marc Ongena2, Wenzheng Liu2, Dan Wei4, Baisuo Zhao3, Dawei Guan1,3, Xin Jiang5,6, Jun Li7,8.
Abstract
Bacteria play vital roles in soil biological fertility; however, it remains poorly understood about their response to long-term fertilization in Chinese Mollisols, especially when organic manure is substituted for inorganic nitrogen (N) fertilizer. To broaden our knowledge, high-throughput pyrosequencing and quantitative PCR were used to explore the impacts of inorganic fertilizer and manure on bacterial community composition in a 35-year field experiment of Chinese Mollisols. Soils were collected from four treatments: no fertilizer (CK), inorganic phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) fertilizer (PK), inorganic P, K, and N fertilizer (NPK), and inorganic P and K fertilizer plus manure (MPK). All fertilization differently changed soil properties. Compared with CK, the PK and NPK treatments acidified soil by significantly decreasing soil pH from 6.48 to 5.53 and 6.16, respectively, while MPK application showed no significant differences of soil pH, indicating alleviation of soil acidification. Moreover, all fertilization significantly increased soil organic matter (OM) and soybean yields, with the highest observed under MPK regime. In addition, the community composition at each taxonomic level varied considerably among the fertilization strategies. Bacterial taxa, associated with plant growth promotion, OM accumulation, disease suppression, and increased soil enzyme activity, were overrepresented in the MPK regime, while they were present at low abundant levels under NPK treatment, i.e. phyla Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes, class Alphaproteobacteria, and genera Variovorax, Chthoniobacter, Massilia, Lysobacter, Catelliglobosispora and Steroidobacter. The application of MPK shifted soil bacterial community composition towards a better status, and such shifts were primarily derived from changes in soil pH and OM.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial community; Fertilization; Illumina MiSeq; Soil degradation; qPCR
Year: 2018 PMID: 29442257 PMCID: PMC5811423 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-018-0549-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Soil properties and soybean yields of different fertilization strategies
| Fertilization strategy | pH | OM (g kg−1) | AK (g kg−1) | TK (g kg−1) | NH4+ (mg kg−1) | NO3− (mg kg−1) | TN (g kg−1) | AP (g kg−1) | TP (g kg−1) | Soybean yield (kg ha−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 6.43 ± 0.08c | 24.39 ± 0.37a | 0.17 ± 0.03a | 6.30 ± 0.89a | 35.01 ± 1.16a | 2.45 ± 0.88a | 1.20 ± 0.05a | 0.02 ± 0.01a | 0.44 ± 0.03a | 1812.67 ± 141.99a |
| PK | 6.18 ± 0.04b | 25.51 ± 0.30c | 0.24 ± 0.01b | 28.57 ± 2.25b | 37.80 ± 2.95a | 3.62 ± 0.57b | 1.26 ± 0.03a | 0.89 ± 0.04c | 0.73 ± 0.02c | 2377.33 ± 118.85bc |
| NPK | 5.54 ± 0.04a | 24.88 ± 0.25b | 0.23 ± 0.03b | 30.36 ± 1.02b | 37.30 ± 6.29a | 4.53 ± 0.91bc | 1.43 ± 0.08b | 0.94 ± 0.06d | 0.70 ± 0.02bc | 2241.33 ± 186.11b |
| MPK | 6.38 ± 0.05c | 27.47 ± 0.41d | 0.23 ± 0.03b | 28.43 ± 3.93b | 39.36 ± 6.95a | 5.17 ± 0.67c | 1.20 ± 0.03a | 0.66 ± 0.01b | 0.61 ± 0.05b | 2702.67 ± 169.39c |
Values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 6). Values within the same column followed by different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s multiple comparison tests
Fig. 1Number of 16S rDNA copies in different fertilization regimes. Different lowercase letters above columns indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s multiple comparison tests
Bacterial α-diversity and Good’s coverage estimator for different fertilization strategies
| Fertilization strategy | CHAO1 | Ace | Simpson | Shannon | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 3231.9 ± 133.0b | 3347.9 ± 149.0a | 0.0076 ± 0.0007a | 6.3 ± 0.03b | 0.95 ± 0.006a |
| PK | 3262.7 ± 154.8b | 3386.1 ± 256.1a | 0.0076 ± 0.0012a | 6.3 ± 0.05b | 0.96 ± 0.007a |
| NPK | 2866.6 ± 63.3a | 3328.8 ± 414.7a | 0.0115 ± 0.0009b | 6.0 ± 0.02a | 0.95 ± 0.006a |
| MPK | 3421.6 ± 94.3b | 3541.9 ± 98.8a | 0.0077 ± 0.0005a | 6.3 ± 0.03b | 0.96 ± 0.001a |
Values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 6). Values within the same column followed by different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. Operational taxonomic units defined based on a 97% similarity threshold
Relative abundance of bacterial phyla of different fertilization strategies (relative abundance > 1%)
| Phylum | CK (%) | PK (%) | NPK (%) | MPK (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 30.79 ± 0.98ab | 29.59 ± 1.00a | 33.47 ± 0.57ab | 35.73 ± 8.96b |
|
| 15.92 ± 0.94b | 16.39 ± 1.78b | 13.61 ± 1.26a | 13.23 ± 1.56a |
|
| 10.30 ± 0.83a | 9.35 ± 3.54a | 10.83 ± 1.46a | 9.26 ± 3.29a |
|
| 8.69 ± 0.33a | 9.22 ± 1.57a | 9.92 ± 0.84a | 8.62 ± 1.32a |
|
| 7.32 ± 0.36ab | 8.04 ± 0.74b | 7.66 ± 0.52ab | 7.03 ± 0.96a |
|
| 7.23 ± 1.07ab | 7.24 ± 0.92a | 8.40 ± 0.91b | 6.03 ± 1.11ab |
|
| 7.51 ± 0.28b | 6.94 ± 0.6ab | 6.50 ± 0.47a | 6.49 ± 1.34a |
|
| 4.18 ± 1.36ab | 4.82 ± 1.49ab | 3.04 ± 0.37a | 5.35 ± 1.8b |
|
| 2.89 ± 0.69a | 3.47 ± 1.59a | 3.62 ± 0.70a | 3.76 ± 1.61a |
|
| 2.71 ± 0.28ab | 2.49 ± 0.18ab | 1.01 ± 0.12a | 2.40 ± 0.30b |
Values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 6). Values within the same column followed by different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s multiple comparison tests
Relative abundance of bacterial classes of different fertilization strategies (relative abundance > 1%)
| Phylum | Class | CK (%) | PK (%) | NPK (%) | MPK (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 12.66 ± 0.88 a | 13.39 ± 0.84a | 19.72 ± 0.77b | 20.61 ± 10.18b |
|
| 10.48 ± 0.97c | 8.86 ± 1.58b | 6.74 ± 0.51a | 7.13 ± 0.81a | |
|
| 4.53 ± 0.57b | 4.17 ± 0.37b | 2.81 ± 0.17a | 4.32 ± 0.32b | |
|
| 3.06 ± 0.49a | 3.09 ± 0.46a | 4.04 ± 0.38b | 3.59 ± 0.18b | |
|
|
| 1.90 ± 0.13b | 2.18 ± 0.20b | 3.88 ± 0.45c | 1.51 ± 0.17a |
|
| 0.62 ± 0.14a | 1.00 ± 0.21b | 2.02 ± 0.15c | 0.78 ± 0.11a | |
|
|
| 7.76 ± 2.99a | 8.19 ± 1.10a | 7.89 ± 2.81a | |
|
| 1.59 ± 0.56a | 2.65 ± 0.40b | 1.37 ± 0.49a | ||
|
|
| 6.75 ± 0.52a | 7.47 ± 1.47ab | 8.36 ± 0.98b | 7.06 ± 1.25ab |
|
|
| 2.77 ± 0.15a | 3.97 ± 0.41b | 4.20 ± 0.42b | 3.05 ± 0.52a |
|
| 3.52 ± 0.29a | 3.27 ± 0.25a | 3.19 ± 0.18a | 3.13 ± 0.48a | |
|
|
| 7.23 ± 1.07ab | 7.24 ± 0.92ab | 8.40 ± 0.91b | 6.03 ± 1.11a |
|
|
| 3.17 ± 0.73ab | 4.25 ± 1.32b | 2.75 ± 0.30a | 4.45 ± 1.55b |
|
|
| 2.71 ± 0.28c | 2.49 ± 0.18bc | 1.01 ± 0.12a | 2.40 ± 0.30b |
Values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 6). Values within the same column followed by different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s multiple comparison tests
Fig. 2Cluster analysis of the 16S rDNA composition of soil-dwelling microbial communities at the class level
Fig. 3Bacterial taxa with significantly different abundances between NPK and MPK treatments. a Histogram of LDA scores for features with significantly different abundance between NPK and MPK treatments. b Taxonomic representation of statistically and biologically consistent differences between NPK and MPK treatments
Fig. 4Principal components analysis of pyrosequencing reads obtained from soils treated with different fertilization strategies based on the weighted Fast UniFrac metric. The first three axes are drawn and the percent of variance explained by each axis is given. Treatment: (circle) CK, no fertilizer; (square) PK, inorganic phosphorus and potassium fertilizer; (triangle) NPK, inorganic P, K and N fertilizer; (star) MPK, inorganic P and K fertilizer plus manure
Fig. 5Redundancy analysis (RDA) of soil bacterial composition and soil properties. Soil factors indicated in arrows include Avail P (available phosphorus), Avail K (available potassium), pH, NO3– (nitrate nitrogen), TN (total nitrogen), TK (total potassium), TP (total phosphorus) and OM (organic matter). Treatment: (star) CK, no fertilizer; (circle) PK, inorganic phosphorus and potassium fertilizer; (square) NPK, inorganic P, K and nitrogen fertilizer; (triangle) MPK, inorganic P and K fertilizer plus manure