Literature DB >> 29441446

Relationship Between Declarations of Conflict of Interests and Reporting Positive Outcomes in Iranian Dental Journals.

Maryam Alsadat Hashemipour1,2, Sepehr Pourmonajemzadeh3, Shahrzad Zoghitavana3, Nader Navabi4,5.   

Abstract

Conflict of interests is a situation when someone is in need of other people's trust on one the hand and has personal or general interests on the other hand, resulting in conflict with the given responsibility. In this research work, an attempt was made to find the relation between declarations of conflict of interests and reporting positive outcomes in the dental journals in Iran (2000-2016). In this analytical/cross-sectional study, first Health and Biomedical Information was searched and all the Persian and English dental journals published in Iran were collected. Then, all the papers published in the journals from December 2000 to December 2016 were collected and categorized in terms of the year of publication, author or authors' affiliations, Persian and English journal, type of the substance or the drug used (including the manufacturing company), declarations of conflict of interests and the positive or negative conclusion of the report. Data were analyzed with the Fisher's exact test and Chi squared test, using the program SPSS 18. In numerical analysis, the significance was set at P < 0.05. Seventeen dental journals in Persian and English were analyzed: 10 in English and 7 in Persian. Reviewing these studies showed that of 1021 articles in Persian, in 128 cases there was no mention of a declaration of conflict of interests and in 11 cases, the COI had been stated. In addition, from 1220 articles in English, in 825 cases there was no mention of declarations of conflict of interests and in 45 cases, the declarations of COI had been mentioned. There was no significant relation between the COI and 'no' COI and the reporting of positive outcomes in papers in Iranian dental journals in terms of the journal type, year of publication and the journals' guarantee form (P = 0.25, P = 0.41 and P = 0.09). A total of 83% of studies with declarations of COI had one positive outcome, with a significant relationship in this field; however, in 73% of studies with no COI, there was one positive outcome, too. In general, the society expects that doctors would not consider any incentives except the health of the patients in the efforts made by them. The severity of the consequences of COI is of higher value when the patients' health is endangered due to it. In addition, COI might change the attitude and approach of other doctors and peers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COI; Declarations of conflict of interests; Dentistry; Positive effect

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29441446     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-018-0022-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  39 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trials in HEPATOLOGY: predictors of quality.

Authors:  L L Kjaergard; D Nikolova; C Gluud
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 2.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Yan Li; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The financing of drug trials by pharmaceutical companies and its consequences. Part 1: a qualitative, systematic review of the literature on possible influences on the findings, protocols, and quality of drug trials.

Authors:  Gisela Schott; Henry Pachl; Ulrich Limbach; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Klaus Lieb
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Toward more uniform conflict disclosures: the updated ICMJE conflict of interest reporting form.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Drazen; Peter W de Leeuw; Christine Laine; Cynthia D Mulrow; Catherine D DeAngelis; Frank A Frizelle; Fiona Godlee; Charlotte Haug; Paul C Hébert; Astrid James; Sheldon Kotzin; Ana Marusic; Humberto Reyes; Jacob Rosenberg; Peush Sahni; Martin B Van Der Weyden; Getu Zhaori
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Primary study authors of significant studies are more likely to believe that a strong association exists in a heterogeneous meta-analysis compared with methodologists.

Authors:  Orestis A Panagiotou; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Accuracy of conflict-of-interest disclosures reported by physicians.

Authors:  Kanu Okike; Mininder S Kocher; Erin X Wei; Charles T Mehlman; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Authors of clinical trials reported individual and financial conflicts of interest more frequently than institutional and nonfinancial ones: a methodological survey.

Authors:  Maram B Hakoum; Nahla Jouni; Eliane A Abou-Jaoude; Divina Justina Hasbani; Elias A Abou-Jaoude; Luciane Cruz Lopes; Mariam Khaldieh; Mira Z Hammoud; Mounir Al-Gibbawi; Sirine Anouti; Gordon Guyatt; Elie A Akl
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  A study of manufacturer-supported trials of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of arthritis.

Authors:  P A Rochon; J H Gurwitz; R W Simms; P R Fortin; D T Felson; K L Minaker; T C Chalmers
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-01-24

9.  Scientific journals and conflict of interest disclosure: what progress has been made?

Authors:  Kathleen Ruff
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Disclosure of Financial Conflicts of Interests in Interventions to Improve Child Psychosocial Health: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Manuel Eisner; David K Humphreys; Philip Wilson; Frances Gardner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.