| Literature DB >> 29441108 |
Yu Bin Kim1, Chih Lung Tang1, Ja Wook Koo1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between vaginal reflux (VR) and urinary tract infection (UTI) in female children aged <36 months.Entities:
Keywords: Urinary tract infection, Vesicoureteral reflux; Vaginal reflux
Year: 2018 PMID: 29441108 PMCID: PMC5807986 DOI: 10.3345/kjp.2018.61.1.17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Pediatr ISSN: 1738-1061
Fig. 1Vaginal reflux (VR) is classified into 3 grades, based on the modified imaginary scoring system from Kelalis et al.8) 1973. (A) Grade 0, no visible flow of VR; (B) grade 1, presence of a tracking flow through the vaginal canal, without vaginal bulging; (C) grade 2, presence of a tracking flow through the vaginal canal, with detection of vaginal bulging.
Demographic profiles of patients
| Variable | Control (n=51) | UTI (n=191) | Total (n=242) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mo) | 3.58±5.65 | 9.11±7.99 | 7.95±7.88 | <0.001 |
| VR prevalence | 7 (13.7) | 82 (42.9) | 89 (36.8) | <0.001 |
| VR grade | ||||
| 0 | 44 (86.3) | 109 (57.1) | 153 (63.2) | <0.001* |
| 1 | 5 (9.8) | 42 (22.0) | 47 (19.4) | |
| 2 | 2 (3.9) | 40 (20.9) | 42 (17.4) | |
| VUR prevalence | 4 (7.8) | 44 (23.0) | 48 (19.8) | <0.001 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).
UTI, urinary tract infection; VR, vaginal reflux; VUR, vesicoureteral reflux.
*z score, −3.89.
The prevalence rate of vaginal reflux
| Age (mo) | Control (n=51) | UTI (n=191) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–2 | 3/27 (11.1) | 7/11 (63.6) | 10/38 (26.3) |
| 2–4 | 2/10 (20.0) | 18/41 (43.9) | 20/51 (39.2) |
| 4–6 | 1/6 (16.7) | 16/39 (41.0) | 17/45 (17.8) |
| 6–8 | 0/1 (0) | 16/31 (51.6) | 16/32 (50.0) |
| 8–10 | 1/5 (20) | 5/15 (33.3) | 6/20 (30.0) |
| 10–12 | 0/0 (0) | 1/7 (14.3) | 1/7 (14.3) |
| 12–24 | 0/1 (0) | 11/28 (39.3) | 11/29 (37.9) |
| 24–36 | 0/1 (0) | 8/19 (42.1) | 8/20 (40.0) |
| Total | 7/51 (13.7) | 82/191 (42.9) | 89/242 (36.8) |
Values are presented as number (%).
Differences in the prevalence rate and grade of VR between UTI and control groups; subanalysis of children 2 to 10 months of age
| Variable | Control (n=22) | UTI (n=126) | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mo) | 4.79±2.40 | 5.28±2.13 | 1.49–0.50* | 0.330 | |
| VR prevalence | 4 (18.2) | 42 (43.7) | 1.83 | 1.12–10.89 | 0.024 |
| VR grade | 0.021† | ||||
| 0 | 18 (81.8) | 71 (56.3) | |||
| 1 | 3 (13.6) | 30 (23.8) | |||
| 2 | 1 (4.5) | 25 (19.8) | |||
| VUR prevalence | 2 | 28 | 2.85 | 0.629–12.97 | 0.157 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).
VR, vaginal reflux; UTI, urinary tract infection; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; VUR, vesicoureteral reflux.
*F value, 0.983. †z score, −2.31.
Clinical characteristics according to the presence of vaginal reflux
| Variable | VR (−) (n=109) | VR (+) (n=82) | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VCUG (VUR grade≥1) | 25 (22.93) | 19 (23.2) | 1.01 | 0.51–2.00 | 0.970 |
| Renal defect on DMSA scan | 44 (40.4) | 34 (41.5) | 1.05 | 0.58–1.87 | 0.879 |
| Abnormal sonography | 34 (31.2) | 32 (39.0) | 1.41 | 0.77–2.58 | 0.260 |
| UTI recurrence | 20 (18.4) | 27 (32.9) | 2.19 | 1.12–4.26 | 0.021* |
| Sepsis | 1 (0.01) | 5 (6.1) | 7.01 | 0.80–61.23 | 0.042* |
| Overweight | 18 (16.51) | 15 (18.3) | 1.13 | 0.53–2.41 | 0.374 |
| Pyuria (>4 WBC/HPF) | 104 (95.4) | 78 (95.2) | 0.94 | 0.24–3.60 | 0.925 |
| Positive urine nitrite | 36 (33.0) | 27 (32.9) | 0.99 | 0.54–1.83 | 0.988 |
| Proteinuria | 45 (41.3) | 40 (48.8) | 1.35 | 0.76–2.41 | 0.302 |
| Hematuria (>4 RBC/HPF) | 75 (68.8) | 59 (72.0) | 1.16 | 0.62–2.18 | 0.638 |
| Duration of fever (day) | 4.26±2.05 | 4.20±1.92 | −0.51 to 0.64 | 0.738 | |
| Length of hospital stay (day) | 5.38±2.11 | 5.30±2.18 | −0.54 to 0.69 | 0.813 | |
| iWBC (/uL) | 16,329.82±6,698.45 | 14,936.95±6,363.43 | −497.90 to 3,283.63 | 0.873 | |
| iCRP (mg/dL) | 6.89±9.96 | 10.73±44.01 | −12.43 to 4.75 | 0.185 |
Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.
The univariate analysis of clinical characteristics and quality of reflux was performed in 191 patients in the UTI group.
VR, vaginal reflux; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; VCUG, voiding cystourethrography; VUR, vesicoureteral reflux; DMSA, 99mtechnetium dimercaptosuccinic acid; UTI, urinary tract infection; WBC, white blood cell; HPF, high power field; RBC, red blood cell count; iWBC, initial WBC; iCRP, initial C-reactive protein.
*P<0.05, VCUG, voiding cystourethrography.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine predictive VCUG score and VR grade for UTI recurrence
| Variable | Exp (B) | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| VCUG | 3.06 | 1.45–6.47 | 0.003* |
| VR grade | 1.73 | 1.15–2.61 | 0.009* |
VCUG, value of voiding cystourethrography; VR, vaginal reflux; UTI, urinary tract infection; CI, confidence interval.
*P<0.05.
Fig. 2Prevalence rate of renal defect according to the status of vaginal reflux (VR) and vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Between-group comparisons were performed using a chi-square test, with results as follows: P=0.177 (VR [−] without VUR vs. VR [−] with VUR), P=0.516 (VR [−] without VUR vs. VR [+] without VUR), P=0.143 (VR [−] with VUR vs. VR [+] with VUR), P= 0.001 (VR [+] without VUR vs. VR [+] with VUR). *P<0.05. Odds ratio (95% CI) of renal defect in patients with a VUR: VR vs. no VR group, 1.85 (0.75–4.51) vs. 6.02 (1.90–19.02). Odds ratio (95% CI) of renal defect in patients with a VR: no VUR vs. VUR group, 0.79 (0.40–1.567) vs. 6.02 (0.71–9.37).