Literature DB >> 29440451

Establishing Transcriptional Signatures to Differentiate PXR-, CAR-, and AhR-Mediated Regulation of Drug Metabolism and Transport Genes in Cryopreserved Human Hepatocytes.

Jamie E Moscovitz1, Amit S Kalgutkar1, Kelly Nulick1, Nathaniel Johnson1, Zhiwu Lin1, Theunis C Goosen1, Yan Weng2.   

Abstract

The potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) arising from transcriptional regulation of drug-disposition genes via activation of nuclear receptors (NRs), such as pregnane X receptor (PXR), constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), and aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), remains largely unexplored, as highlighted in a recent guidance document from the European Medicines Agency. The goal of this research was to establish PXR-/CAR-/AhR-specific drug-metabolizing enzyme (DME) and transporter gene expression signatures in sandwich-cultured cryopreserved human hepatocytes using selective activators of PXR (rifampin), CAR (CITCO), and AhR (omeprazole). Dose response for ligand-induced changes to 38 major human DMEs and critical hepatobiliary transporters were assessed using a custom gene expression array card. We identified novel differentially expressed drug-disposition genes for PXR (↑ABCB1/MDR1, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and EPHX1, ↓ABCB11), CAR [↑sulfotransferase (SULT) 1E1, uridine glucuronosyl transferase (UGT) 2B4], and AhR (↑SLC10A1/NTCP, SLCO1B1/OATP1B1], and coregulated genes (CYP1A1, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP3A4, UGT1A1, UGT1A4). Subsequently, DME gene expression signatures were generated for known CYP3A4 inducers PF-06282999 and pazopanib. The former produced an induction signature almost identical to that of rifampin, suggesting activation of the PXR pathway, whereas the latter produced an expression signature distinct from those of PXR, CAR, or AhR, suggesting involvement of an alternate pathway(s). These results demonstrate that involvement of PXR/CAR/AhR can be identified via expression changes of signature DME/transporter genes. Inclusion of such signature genes could serve to simultaneously identify potential inducers and inhibitors, and the NRs involved in the transcriptional regulation, thus providing a more holistic and mechanism-based assessment of DDI risk for DMEs and transporters beyond conventional cytochrome P450 isoforms.
Copyright © 2018 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29440451     DOI: 10.1124/jpet.117.247296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  12 in total

1.  Changes and sex- and age-related differences in the expression of drug metabolizing enzymes in a KRAS-mutant mouse model of lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Li; Yiyan Lu; Xiaojun Ou; Sijing Zeng; Ying Wang; Xiaoxiao Qi; Lijun Zhu; Zhongqiu Liu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Assessment of the Mode of Action Underlying the Effects of GenX in Mouse Liver and Implications for Assessing Human Health Risks.

Authors:  Grace A Chappell; Chad M Thompson; Jeffrey C Wolf; John M Cullen; James E Klaunig; Laurie C Haws
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 1.902

3.  High-throughput toxicogenomic screening of chemicals in the environment using metabolically competent hepatic cell cultures.

Authors:  Jill A Franzosa; Jessica A Bonzo; John Jack; Nancy C Baker; Parth Kothiya; Rafal P Witek; Patrick Hurban; Stephen Siferd; Susan Hester; Imran Shah; Stephen S Ferguson; Keith A Houck; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  NPJ Syst Biol Appl       Date:  2021-01-27

4.  Constitutive Androstane Receptor-Mediated Inhibition of Metformin on Phase II Metabolic Enzyme SULT2A1.

Authors:  Xiaowen Hu; Mengsiyu Li; Chunxue Zhang; Shuguang Pang
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.257

Review 5.  Drug-Drug Interactions Involving Intestinal and Hepatic CYP1A Enzymes.

Authors:  Florian Klomp; Christoph Wenzel; Marek Drozdzik; Stefan Oswald
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 6.321

6.  Cyclophosphamide bioactivation pharmacogenetics in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Nuala Helsby; Minghan Yong; Kathryn Burns; Michael Findlay; David Porter
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Hydrostatic pressure regulates CYP1A2 expression in human hepatocytes via a mechanosensitive aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent pathway.

Authors:  Lewis Burton; Paula Scaife; Stuart W Paine; Howard R Mellor; Lynn Abernethy; Peter Littlewood; Cyril Rauch
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.249

8.  Resveratrol Inhibits Key Steps of Steroid Metabolism in a Human Estrogen-Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Model: Impact on Cellular Proliferation.

Authors:  Stefan Poschner; Alexandra Maier-Salamon; Martin Zehl; Judith Wackerlig; Daniel Dobusch; Anastasia Meshcheryakova; Diana Mechtcheriakova; Theresia Thalhammer; Bettina Pachmann; Walter Jäger
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 9.  Xenobiotic Receptors and Their Mates in Atopic Dermatitis.

Authors:  Deborah Minzaghi; Petra Pavel; Sandrine Dubrac
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  PXR: a center of transcriptional regulation in cancer.

Authors:  Yaqi Xing; Jiong Yan; Yongdong Niu
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 11.413

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.