Literature DB >> 29439286

Evidence flowers: An innovative, visual method of presenting "best evidence" summaries to health professional and lay audiences.

O O Babatunde1, V Tan1, J L Jordan1, K Dziedzic1, C A Chew-Graham1,2, C Jinks1, J Protheroe1, D A van der Windt1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Barriers to dissemination and engagement with evidence pose a threat to implementing evidence-based medicine. Understanding, retention, and recall can be enhanced by visual presentation of information. The aim of this exploratory research was to develop and evaluate the accessibility and acceptability of visual summaries for presenting evidence syntheses with multiple exposures or outcomes to professional and lay audiences.
METHODS: "Evidence flowers" were developed as a visual method of presenting data from 4 case scenarios: 2 complex evidence syntheses with multiple outcomes, Cochrane reviews, and clinical guidelines. Petals of evidence flowers were coloured according to the GRADE evidence rating system to display key findings and recommendations from the evidence summaries. Application of evidence flowers was observed during stakeholder workshops. Evaluation and feedback were conducted via questionnaires and informal interviews.
RESULTS: Feedback from stakeholders on the evidence flowers collected from workshops, questionnaires, and interviews was encouraging and helpful for refining the design of the flowers. Comments were made on the content and design of the flowers, as well as the usability and potential for displaying different types of evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence flowers are a novel and visually stimulating method for presenting research evidence from evidence syntheses with multiple exposures or outcomes, Cochrane reviews, and clinical guidelines. To promote access and engagement with research evidence, evidence flowers may be used in conjunction with other evidence synthesis products, such as (lay) summaries, evidence inventories, rapid reviews, and clinical guidelines. Additional research on potential adaptations and applications of the evidence flowers may further bridge the gap between research evidence and clinical practice.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  accessibility; clinical guidelines; dissemination; evidence synthesis; evidence-based practice

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29439286     DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Synth Methods        ISSN: 1759-2879            Impact factor:   5.273


  2 in total

1.  Charting the landscape of graphical displays for meta-analysis and systematic reviews: a comprehensive review, taxonomy, and feature analysis.

Authors:  Michael Kossmeier; Ulrich S Tran; Martin Voracek
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Development of an optimised physiotherapist-led treatment protocol for lateral elbow tendinopathy: a consensus study using an online nominal group technique.

Authors:  Marcus Bateman; Benjamin Saunders; Chris Littlewood; Jonathan C Hill
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.