Literature DB >> 29439089

Yellow (577 nm) micropulse laser versus half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy in eyes with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: results of the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study (PACORES) Group.

Jose A Roca1, Lihteh Wu2, Jans Fromow-Guerra3,4, Francisco J Rodríguez5, Maria H Berrocal6, Sergio Rojas7, Luiz H Lima8, Roberto Gallego-Pinazo9, Jay Chhablani10, J Fernando Arevalo11, David Lozano-Rechy12, Martin Serrano13.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of eyes with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy treated with yellow micropulse (MP) laser versus half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT).
METHODS: This is a multicentre, retrospective comparative study of 92 eyes treated with yellow MP laser (duty cycle of 5%, zero spacing between spots, spot size varied from 100 to 200 µm, power varied from 320 to 660 mW, and the pulse burst duration was 200 ms) and 67 eyes treated with PDT (half-dose verteporfin (3 mg/m2) infused over 10 min), followed by laser activation for 83 s. Spot sizes varied from 400 to 2000 µm.
RESULTS: In the MP group, at 12 months of follow-up, the mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) of 0.41±0.27 at baseline to 0.21±0.26 (P<0.0001), 48.9% (45/92) of eyes had an improvement of ≥3 lines of BCVA from baseline, 48.9% (45/92) of eyes remained within 2 lines of baseline BCVA, and only 2.2% (2/92) of eyes lost ≥3 lines of BCVA from baseline. In the PDT group, at 12 months of follow-up, the mean BCVA changed from logMAR of 0.50±0.34 at baseline to 0.47±0.34 (P=0.89), 19% (13/67) of eyes had an improvement of ≥3 lines of BCVA from baseline, 73% (49/67) of eyes remained within 2 lines of baseline BCVA, and 7% (5/67) of eyes lost ≥3 lines of BCVA from baseline. There were no adverse events attributable to the yellow MP laser treatment. One eye in the PDT group developed choroidal neovascularisation, which was treated with three intravitreal bevacizumab injections.
CONCLUSIONS: Both PDT and MP are effective in restoring the macular anatomy. In places where PDT is not available, yellow MP laser may be an adequate treatment alternative. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  macula; retina; treatment lasers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29439089     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  12 in total

1.  Efficacy of the subthreshold micropulse yellow wavelength laser photostimulation in the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

Authors:  Mehmed Uğur Işık; Mehmet Fatih Kağan Değirmenci; Ayhan Sağlık
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Pachychoroid neovasculopathy: a type-1 choroidal neovascularization belonging to the pachychoroid spectrum-pathogenesis, imaging and available treatment options.

Authors:  Francesco Sartini; Michele Figus; Giamberto Casini; Marco Nardi; Chiara Posarelli
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 3.  Non-resolving, recurrent and chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: available treatment options.

Authors:  Francesco Sartini; Michele Figus; Marco Nardi; Giamberto Casini; Chiara Posarelli
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of subthreshold micropulse laser with photodynamic therapy for the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhizhong Wu; Huixing Wang; Junsheng An
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Efficacy of nanosecond laser treatment in central serous chorioretinopathy with and without atrophy of retinal pigment epithelium.

Authors:  Hakan Kaymak; Saskia Funk; Andreas Fricke; Roxana Fulga; Karsten Klabe; Berthold Seitz; Achim Langenbucher; Hartmut Schwahn
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2020-06-04

Review 6.  Management of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

Authors:  Daren Hanumunthadu; Anna C S Tan; Sumit Randhir Singh; Niroj Kumar Sahu; Jay Chhablani
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  532-nm Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for the Treatment of Chronic Central Serous Retinopathy.

Authors:  Keissy Sousa; Gil Calvão-Santos; Marina João; Nuno Gomes; Manuel Falcão
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-25

8.  Comparison of 532 nm Micropulse Green Laser versus Continuous-Wave 532 nm Green Laser in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Katarzyna Piasecka; Piotr Gozdek; Mariusz Maroszyński; Dominik Odrobina
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Subthreshold Micropulse Laser vs. Conventional Laser for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Lijun Zhou; Kunbei Lai; Ling Jin; Chuangxin Huang; Fabao Xu; Yajun Gong; Longhui Li; Zhe Zhu; Lin Lu; Chenjin Jin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-16

10.  Long-term follow-up of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy after successful treatment with photodynamic therapy or micropulse laser.

Authors:  Thomas J van Rijssen; Elon H C van Dijk; Paula Scholz; Myrte B Breukink; Greet Dijkman; Petrus J H Peters; Roula Tsonaka; Jan E E Keunen; Robert E MacLaren; Carel B Hoyng; Susan M Downes; Sascha Fauser; Camiel J F Boon
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.761

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.