Stephan N Salzmann1, Peter B Derman2, Lukas P Lampe3, Janina Kueper4, Ting Jung Pan1, Jingyan Yang1, Jennifer Shue1, Federico P Girardi1, Stephen Lyman1, Alexander P Hughes5. 1. Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA. 2. Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 3. Clinic for General Orthopaedics and Tumour Orthopaedics, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany. 4. Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany. 5. Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: hughesa@hss.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rate of cervical spinal fusion has been increasing significantly. However, there is a paucity of literature describing trends based on surgical approach using complete population databases. We investigated the approach-based trends in epidemiology, indications, and in-hospital outcomes of cervical spinal fusion. METHODS: New York's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried to identify patients who underwent primary subaxial cervical fusion from 1997 to 2012. Demographic and clinical information was obtained. Subgroup analyses were performed based on surgical approach: anterior (A), posterior (P), and circumferential (C). RESULTS: A total of 87,045 cervical fusions were included. Over the study period, the population-adjusted annual fusion rate increased from 23.7 to 50.6 per 100,000 population (P < 0.001). A fusion was most common (85.2%), followed by P (12.3%), and C (2.5%). Mean ages were 49.8 ± 11.9, 59.9 ± 15.2, and 55.1 ± 14.5 years (P < 0.001), respectively. Although rates remained steady among younger patients, they increased for older patients. Overall, degenerative conditions were the predominant indications for surgery and increased in rate over time. The mean length of stay was: A, 3.1 ± 10.5; P, 9.1 ± 14.1; and C, 14.1 ± 22.5 days (P < 0.001). Rates of in-hospital complications were A, 3.0%; P, 10.5%; and C, 18.9% (P < 0.001), and mortality was A, 0.3%, P, 1.8%, and C, 2.5% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of subaxial spinal fusions increased 114% from 1997 to 2012 in New York State. Rates remained stable in younger patients but increased in the older population. Preoperative indications and postoperative courses differed significantly among the various approaches, with patients undergoing anterior fusion having better short-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The rate of cervical spinal fusion has been increasing significantly. However, there is a paucity of literature describing trends based on surgical approach using complete population databases. We investigated the approach-based trends in epidemiology, indications, and in-hospital outcomes of cervical spinal fusion. METHODS: New York's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried to identify patients who underwent primary subaxial cervical fusion from 1997 to 2012. Demographic and clinical information was obtained. Subgroup analyses were performed based on surgical approach: anterior (A), posterior (P), and circumferential (C). RESULTS: A total of 87,045 cervical fusions were included. Over the study period, the population-adjusted annual fusion rate increased from 23.7 to 50.6 per 100,000 population (P < 0.001). A fusion was most common (85.2%), followed by P (12.3%), and C (2.5%). Mean ages were 49.8 ± 11.9, 59.9 ± 15.2, and 55.1 ± 14.5 years (P < 0.001), respectively. Although rates remained steady among younger patients, they increased for older patients. Overall, degenerative conditions were the predominant indications for surgery and increased in rate over time. The mean length of stay was: A, 3.1 ± 10.5; P, 9.1 ± 14.1; and C, 14.1 ± 22.5 days (P < 0.001). Rates of in-hospital complications were A, 3.0%; P, 10.5%; and C, 18.9% (P < 0.001), and mortality was A, 0.3%, P, 1.8%, and C, 2.5% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of subaxial spinal fusions increased 114% from 1997 to 2012 in New York State. Rates remained stable in younger patients but increased in the older population. Preoperative indications and postoperative courses differed significantly among the various approaches, with patients undergoing anterior fusion having better short-term outcomes.
Authors: Anna Kotkansalo; Antti Malmivaara; Merja Korajoki; Katariina Korhonen; Ville Leinonen Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Ryan K Badiee; Andrew K Chan; Joshua Rivera; Annette Molinaro; Brianna R Doherty; K Daniel Riew; Dean Chou; Praveen V Mummaneni; Lee A Tan Journal: Neurospine Date: 2019-09-30
Authors: Anna Kotkansalo; Ville Leinonen; Merja Korajoki; Jyrki Salmenkivi; Katariina Korhonen; Antti Malmivaara Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Anna Kotkansalo; Ville Leinonen; Merja Korajoki; Katariina Korhonen; Jaakko Rinne; Antti Malmivaara Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 4.654