Literature DB >> 29438672

The effects of theta burst stimulation (TBS) targeting the prefrontal cortex on executive functioning: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cassandra J Lowe1, Felicia Manocchio1, Adrian B Safati1, Peter A Hall2.   

Abstract

Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a highly efficient repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) variant employed in experimental and clinical treatment paradigms. Despite widespread usage of TBS targeting the prefrontal cortex (PFC), there has been no systematic review of the evidence linking TBS protocols to changes in task performance on common measures of prefrontal function in general, and executive functions specifically. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases to identify articles examining the effects of TBS targeting the PFC on executive function task performance. Both the up-regulating (intermittent theta burst stimulation; iTBS) and down-regulating (continuous theta burst stimulation; cTBS) variants of TBS were considered. 32 (29 cTBS; 8 iTBS) studies met the inclusion criteria. Participants (n = 759; 51.41% female) were primarily young adults (Mage = 26), with one study examining the effects of cTBS and iTBS in older adults. Results from individual studies were converted to Hedge's g and random-effects models were used to estimate the overall effect size for each protocol. Age, biological sex, and control methodology were examined as potential moderators of the cTBS effect on executive function test performance. Findings indicated a- reliable attentuating effect of cTBS on executive function task performance (g = -.244, Z = -5.920, p < .001); this effect was relatively uniform across included studies (Q= 24.178, p = .838, I2 = 0). Although no significant moderators of the cTBS effect were identified, laterality sub analyses indicated that the magnitude of the effect was significantly higher (Mdiff = .213, Zdiff = 2.546, p = .011) for left-sided (g = -.358, Z = -5.816, p < .001) relative to right-sided (g = -.145, Z = -2.552, p = .011) PFC stimulation. A systematic review of iTBS studies revealed variability in reliability of effects though most were in the theorized direction. TBS protocols appear to be effective in modulating prefrontal cortical excitability in previously theorized directions.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Executive function; Meta-analysis; Prefrontal cortex; Theta burst stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29438672     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  17 in total

Review 1.  Mapping Structure-Function Relationships in the Brain.

Authors:  Abraham Z Snyder; Adam Q Bauer
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-10-29

2.  Heart Rate Variability Features as Predictors of Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Response in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Authors:  Camila Cosmo; Antonia V Seligowski; Emily M Aiken; Mascha Van't Wout-Frank; Noah S Philip
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2022-02-03

3.  High-frequency versus theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of poststroke cognitive impairment in humans

Authors:  Po-Yi Tsai; Wang-Sheng Lin; Kun-Ting Tsai; Chia-Yu Kuo; Pei-Hsin Lin
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.186

4.  The effects of individualised intermittent theta burst stimulation in the prefrontal cortex: A TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Sung Wook Chung; Caley M Sullivan; Nigel C Rogasch; Kate E Hoy; Neil W Bailey; Robin F H Cash; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Genomic basis of delayed reward discounting.

Authors:  Joshua C Gray; Sandra Sanchez-Roige; Harriet de Wit; James MacKillop; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates language-related inhibitory processes in bilinguals: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Anna Ware; Jarrad A G Lum; Melissa Kirkovski
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.270

7.  Heart Rate Variability Features as Predictors of Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Response in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Authors:  Camila Cosmo; Antonia V Seligowski; Emily M Aiken; Mascha Van't Wout-Frank; Noah S Philip
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-09-27

Review 8.  Precise Modulation Strategies for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Advances and Future Directions.

Authors:  Gangliang Zhong; Zhengyi Yang; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 5.203

9.  Variability in cTBS Aftereffects Attributed to the Interaction of Stimulus Intensity With BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism.

Authors:  Denise Y Harvey; Laura DeLoretta; Priyanka P Shah-Basak; Rachel Wurzman; Daniela Sacchetti; Ahmed Ahmed; Abdou Thiam; Falk W Lohoff; Olufunsho Faseyitan; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  A Commentary on Gender Does Not Matter: Add-on Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment for Female Methamphetamine Dependents.

Authors:  Yan Zeng; Hui Zheng; Weiqi He
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.