Literature DB >> 2943863

Sensory registration and informational persistence.

D E Irwin, J M Yeomans.   

Abstract

The traditional view of iconic memory as a precategorical, high-capacity, quickly decaying visible memory has recently come under attack (e.g., Coltheart, 1980). Specifically, distinctions have been drawn between visible persistence, or the phenomenal trace of an extinguished stimulus, and informational persistence, knowledge about the visual properties of the stimulus. In the present research we tested two alternative conceptions of informational persistence. One conception is that visual information persists in a visual memory that begins at stimulus offset and lasts for 150-300 ms, independently of exposure duration. The second is that informational persistence arises from a nonvisual memory that contains spatial coordinates for displayed items along with identity codes for those items. Three experiments were conducted in which 3 X 3 letter arrays were presented for durations ranging from 50 to 500 ms. A single character mask presented at varying intervals after array offset cued report of an entire row of the array. Comparison of the cued row's masked and unmasked letters revealed that spatially-specific visual (i.e., maskable) information persisted after stimulus offset, regardless of exposure duration. This result favors the visual conception of informational persistence. But there was also support for the nonvisual conception: Accuracy increased and item intrusion errors decreased as stimulus duration increased. The implications of these results for models of informational persistence and for transsaccadic integration during reading are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2943863     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.12.3.343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  30 in total

1.  Isolating the interference caused by cue duration in partial report: a quantitative approach.

Authors:  B Giesbrecht; P Dixon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-03

2.  Does visual short-term memory have a high-capacity stage?

Authors:  Michi Matsukura; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

3.  The Effects of Age and Set Size on the Fast Extraction of Egocentric Distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Courtney P Wallin; John W Philbeck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-01-22

4.  Transsaccadic representation of layout: what is the time course of boundary extension?

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Location errors in partial-report bar-probe experiments: in search of the origin of cue-alignment problems.

Authors:  R Hagenaar; A H van der Heijden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

6.  Very short-term visual memory for size and shape.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-03

7.  Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Spatial resolution in visual memory.

Authors:  Asaf Ben-Shalom; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

9.  Priming effects on the perceived grouping of ambiguous dot patterns.

Authors:  Daniel D Kurylo; Farhan Bukhari
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-10-04

10.  Tachistoscopic exposure and masking of real three-dimensional scenes.

Authors:  Stephen Pothier; John Philbeck; David Chichka; Daniel A Gajewski
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.