Literature DB >> 29438463

Efficacy and safety findings from DREAM: a phase III study of DHP107 (oral paclitaxel) versus i.v. paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy.

Y-K Kang1, M-H Ryu2, S H Park3, J G Kim4, J W Kim5, S-H Cho6, Y-I Park7, S R Park2, S Y Rha8, M J Kang9, J Y Cho8, S Y Kang10, S Y Roh11, B-Y Ryoo2, B-H Nam12, Y-W Jo13, K-E Yoon13, S C Oh14.   

Abstract

Background: Paclitaxel is currently only available as an intravenous (i.v.) formulation. DHP107 is a novel oral formulation of lipid ingredients and paclitaxel. DHP107 demonstrated comparable efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics to i.v. paclitaxel as a second-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). DREAM is a multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized phase III study of patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed, unresectable/recurrent AGC after first-line therapy failure. Methods and materials: Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to DHP107 (200 mg/m2 orally twice daily days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks) or i.v. paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 day 1 every 3 weeks). Patients were stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, disease status, and prior treatment; response was assessed (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) every 6 weeks. Primary end point: non-inferiority of progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points: overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. For the efficacy analysis, sequential tests for non-inferiority were carried out, first with a non-inferiority margin of 1.48, then with a margin of 1.25.
Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced in the 236 randomized patients (n = 118 per arm). Median PFS (per-protocol) was 3.0 (95% CI 1.7-4.0) months for DHP107 and 2.6 (95% CI 1.8-2.8) months for paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85; 95% CI 0.64-1.13). A sensitivity analysis on PFS using independent central review showed similar results (HR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.70-1.24). Median OS (full analysis set) was 9.7 (95% CI 7.1 - 11.5) months for DHP107 versus 8.9 (95% CI 7.1-12.2) months for paclitaxel (HR = 1.04; 95% CI 0.76-1.41). ORR was 17.8% for DHP107 (CR 4.2%; PR 13.6%) versus 25.4% for paclitaxel (CR 3.4%; PR 22.0%). Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and mucositis were more common with DHP107; peripheral neuropathy was more common with paclitaxel. There were only few Grade≥3 adverse events, most commonly neutropenia (42% versus 53%); febrile neutropenia was reported infrequently (5.9% versus 2.5%). No hypersensitivity reactions occurred with DHP107 (paclitaxel 2.5%). Conclusions: DHP107 as a second-line treatment of AGC was non-inferior to paclitaxel for PFS; other efficacy and safety parameters were comparable. DHP107 is the first oral paclitaxel with proven efficacy/safety for the treatment of AGC. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01839773.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29438463     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current therapeutic landscape for advanced gastroesophageal cancers.

Authors:  Anthony Lopez; Kazuto Harada; Dilsa Mizrak Kaya; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-02

2.  A phase Ib study of Oraxol (oral paclitaxel and encequidar) in patients with advanced malignancies.

Authors:  Wen Wee Ma; Jenny J Li; Nilofer S Azad; Elaine T Lam; Jennifer R Diamond; Grace K Dy; Mateusz Opyrchal; Jay Zhi; Douglas Kramer; Wing-Kai Chan; David Cutler; Rudolf Kwan; Alex A Adjei; Antonio Jimeno
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 3.  Boosting the oral bioavailability of anticancer drugs through intentional drug-drug interactions.

Authors:  Eric D Eisenmann; Zahra Talebi; Alex Sparreboom; Sharyn D Baker
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.080

4.  Phase II study of DHP107 (oral paclitaxel) in the first-line treatment of HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (OPTIMAL study).

Authors:  Sung-Bae Kim; Jae Hong Seo; Jin-Hee Ahn; Tae-Yong Kim; Seok Yun Kang; Joohyuk Sohn; Yaewon Yang; Kyong Hwa Park; Yong Wha Moon; Seungtaek Lim; Myoung Joo Kang; Koung Eun Yoon; Hyun Ju Cho; Keun Seok Lee
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 8.168

5.  Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of oral paclitaxel for treatment of various cancers in dogs (2017-2021).

Authors:  Hyung-Kyu Chae; Ye-In Oh; Sumin Park; Ju-Hyun An; Kyoungwon Seo; Kyuyong Kang; Seung-Nam Chu; Hwa-Young Youn
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2022-05-27

Review 6.  Nanomedicines for Overcoming Cancer Drug Resistance.

Authors:  Tingting Hu; Hanlin Gong; Jiayue Xu; Yuan Huang; Fengbo Wu; Zhiyao He
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 6.525

7.  Use of oral paclitaxel for the treatment of bladder tumors in dogs.

Authors:  Hyung-Kyu Chae; Ji-In Yang; Ju-Hyun An; In-Hyun Lee; Min-Hee Son; Woo-Jin Song; Hwa-Young Youn
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 1.267

8.  Tissue pharmacokinetics of DHP107, a novel lipid-based oral formulation of paclitaxel, in mice and patients by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Byung Seok Moon; Hyun Soo Park; Jung Sunwoo; In-Hyun Lee; Anhye Kim; Seol Ju Moon; Heechan Lee; Min Hee Son; Su Bin Kim; Sun Mi Park; Sang-Keun Woo; Jun-Hee Jang; Bom Sahn Kim; Jee Hyun Kim; Sang Eun Kim; Howard Lee
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.689

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.