| Literature DB >> 29438434 |
Zhi-Qiang Wu1,2, Qi Zou1, Tao Chang1, Dong Zhang3, Liang-Liang Huang1.
Abstract
More than 50% of Chinese mangroves were lost between 1950 and 2000 to habitat destruction, prompting an urge for conservation. To assess the importance of the protected Maowei Gulf mangrove estuary for fish population assemblage in the Beibu Gulf (China), we studied species composition and abundance of juvenile fish (including larvae) from July 2012 to June 2013. A total of 11 691 specimens were collected, which belonged to 24 species and 15 families. Six perciform species constituted 93% of the total sample. Pseudogobius javanicus (53.29%) was the dominant species from August to November, Omobranchus elegans (28.49%) from April to July, non-identified species in December and January, and Liza carinata in February and March. A number of commercially important fish species were also identified. Abundance was the highest in summer/early autumn (max 162.4 in Sep), and lowest in winter/early spring (Mar = 4.5). Diversity (H') and richness (Dma) indices (both max. in May: 1.67 and 1.95 respectively) were generally positively correlated with tide and temperature, and negatively with salinity. Seasonal variations play a more important role in the fish assemblage structure than tidal rhythm, with differences particularly pronounced between colder and warmer months. Despite the prominent seasonal differences in abiotic factors, this study indicates that Maowei mangroves provide habitat and food for juvenile fish throughout the year and thus are indispensable for the fish diversity in the Beibu Gulf.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29438434 PMCID: PMC5810996 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192426
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The sampling location (a) and path (b) in the Maowei Sea mangroves. a) Sampling location is marked by a black dot (small picture) and a red dot (large picture). b) S—starting point, E—ending point.
Fig 2Monthly variation in abiotic factors, species diversity index and abundance in the Maowei Sea mangroves.
a) Monthly variation in temperature and salinity. b) Monthly variation in diversity and abundance, where diversity is the total number of sampled species and abundance is the total number of sampled specimens. c) Monthly variation in diversity indices in the studied area, where H’ is Shannon-Weaver's index of species diversity, Dma is Margalef’s index of species richness, and J’ is Pielou's index of evenness.
Fish species sampled between July 2012 and June 2013 in the Maowei Sea mangroves.
| Order | Family | Species | Month | No | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perciformes | Gobiidae | 7–12, 2–6 | 6230 | 53.29 | |
| 8, 12, 2–4, 6 | 10 | 0.09 | |||
| 5 | 21 | 0.18 | |||
| sp. 1 | 2–4 | 46 | 0.39 | ||
| sp. 2 | 2–3, 5–6 | 30 | 0.26 | ||
| Blenniidae | 7–11, 4–6 | 3331 | 28.49 | ||
| Nemipteridae | 7–11, 4–6 | 736 | 6.30 | ||
| Ambassidae | spp. | 8–10, 4–6 | 116 | 0.99 | |
| Eleotridae | 8–12, 5 | 32 | 0.27 | ||
| 12, 1–2 | 44 | 0.38 | |||
| Callionymidae | 8–12, 1–2 | 16 | 0.14 | ||
| Sparidae | 12, 1 | 16 | 0.14 | ||
| 12, 1–3 | 22 | 0.19 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 0.05 | |||
| Clupeiformes | Clupeidae | 7–11, 4–6 | 262 | 2.24 | |
| 1–4 | 26 | 0.22 | |||
| Engraulidae | 7–8, 5–6 | 168 | 1.44 | ||
| Syngnathiformes | Syngnathidae | 7–11, 4–6 | 79 | 0.68 | |
| Gadiformes | Bregmacerotidae | 11–12 | 36 | 0.31 | |
| Pleuronectiformes | Cynoglossidae | spp. | 12, 5 | 2 | 0.02 |
| Tetraodontiformes | Tetraodontidae | spp. | 1–3 | 7 | 0.06 |
| Mugiliformes | Mugilidae | 2–5 | 140 | 1.20 | |
| Aulopiformes | Synodontidae | spp. | 5–6 | 10 | 0.09 |
| N.A. | N.A. | “other” | 12, 1–2 | 305 | 2.61 |
Higher taxonomic levels (order and family) are given in the two columns on the left. Months are in the numeric form (1 to 12). “No” is the total number of specimens and % is the numeric percentage of each species in the total sample.
Dominant fish species in the Maowei Sea mangroves between July 2012 and June 2013.
| Dominant species | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Sum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 821 | 1379 | 2280 | 1108 | 103 | 151 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 93 | 226 | 61 | 6230 | |
| 1263 | 468 | 669 | 206 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 133 | 281 | 283 | 3331 | |
| 31 | 12 | 3 | 46 | ||||||||||
| 66 | 24 | 7 | 43 | 140 | |||||||||
| 179 | 125 | 1 | 305 | ||||||||||
| 2477 | 2196 | 3085 | 1343 | 163 | 391 | 166 | 168 | 54 | 304 | 782 | 562 | 11691 |
Fish juveniles that were unidentifiable (to a family-level) in the early life stages were classified as “other”. Total abundance is the number of all specimens sampled each month.
Fig 3Cluster analysis of the fish assemblage structure by monthly variations and tidal rhythm.
Monthly samples were divided according to the tidal rhythm into the following four categories: high tide during semi-diurnal tides (SH), low tide during semi-diurnal tides (SL), high tide during diurnal tides (DH) and low tide during diurnal tides (DL). Months are in the numeric form (1 to 12). Dashed line indicates the 50% cut-off value.
One-way ANOSIM test for juvenile fish communities between different months by R(P).
| Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 0.94 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.31 (14.3) |
| Feb | 0.83 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.94 | |
| Mar | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.96 | ||
| Apr | 0.27 (11.4) | -0.06 (57.1) | 0.50 (5.7) | 0.27 (14.3) | 0.27 (17.1) | 0.18 (8.6) | 0.33 (5.7) | 0.94 | |||
| May | -0.04 (48.6) | 0.22 (20) | 0.08 (37.1) | 0.00 (34.3) | 0.12 (20) | 0.51 (5.7) | 0.96 | ||||
| Jun | 0.16 (22.9) | 0.08 (25.7) | 0.12 (25.7) | -0.01 (60) | 0.35 (5.7) | 0.94 | |||||
| Jul | -0.03 (40) | 0.19 (11.4) | 0.28 (8.6) | 0.50 (5.7) | 0.94 | ||||||
| Aug | -0.05 (48.6) | -0.02 (45.7) | 0.40 (8.6) | 0.96 | |||||||
| Sep | -0.19 (88.6) | 0.52 ( | 0.93 | ||||||||
| Oct | 0.40 (5.7) | 0.90 | |||||||||
| Nov | 0.80 |
Significant (0.01) correlations are bolded. Numbers in brackets are expressed as percentages (%).
Correlation analysis between fish and abiotic factors in the Maowei Sea.
| T type | T level | Salinity | Temp | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abundance | -0.11 | 0.29 | ||
| No. of species | 0.21 | -0.27 | 0.13 | |
| Species richness (Dma) | 0.22 | 0.20 | ||
| Species diversity (H’) | 0.07 | 0.25 | -0.26 | 0.20 |
| Species evenness (J’) | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.28 | |
| 0.00 | -0.25 | |||
| 0.06 | ||||
| -0.18 | 0.23 | |||
| -0.13 | 0.24 | |||
| 0.18 | 0.03 | -0.26 | 0.24 | |
| 0.05 | -0.04 | |||
T type is tidal rhythm type (diurnal or semi-diurnal), T level is tidal level, and Temp is temperature.
* indicates that the correlation is statistically significant (0.05 level), and
** highly significant (0.01 level). All statistically significant values are bolded. For tide type and level, positive values indicate a positive correlation with diurnal and high tide. ANOVA was used to assess statistical significance.