| Literature DB >> 29438292 |
Terence Odoch1, Camilla Sekse2, Trine M L'Abee-Lund3, Helge Christoffer Høgberg Hansen4, Clovice Kankya5, Yngvild Wasteson6.
Abstract
Non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) are foodborne pathogens of global public health significance. The aim of this study was to subtype a collection of 85 NTS originating from poultry farms in Uganda, and to evaluate a subgroup of phenotypically resistant isolates for common antimicrobial resistance genes and associated integrons. All isolates were subtyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Phenotypically resistant isolates (n = 54) were screened by PCR for the most relevant AMR genes corresponding to their phenotypic resistance pattern, and all 54 isolates were screened by PCR for the presence of integron class 1 and 2 encoding genes. These genes are known to commonly encode resistance to ampicillin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim, sulfonamide and chloramphenicol. PFGE revealed 15 pulsotypes representing 11 serotypes from 75 isolates, as 10 were non-typable. Thirty one (57.4%) of the 54 resistant isolates carried at least one of the seven genes (blaTEM-1,cmlA, tetA, qnrS,sul1,dhfrI,dhfrVII) identified by PCR and six (11%) carried class 1 integrons. This study has shown that a diversity of NTS-clones are present in Ugandan poultry farm settings, while at the same time similar NTS-clones occur in different farms and areas. The presence of resistance genes to important antimicrobials used in human and veterinary medicine has been demonstrated, hence the need to strengthen strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance at all levels.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; genes; genotypes; integrons; non-typhoidal Salmonella; poultry; subtyping
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29438292 PMCID: PMC5858393 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15020324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
PCR primers used for amplification of genes encoding integrons and antimicrobial resistance in non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates.
| Target Category | Target Gene | Primer Sequence | Amplicon Size (bp) | Annealing Temp (°C) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integron | Class 1 integron | Variable size | 55 | [ | |
| GGCATCCAAGCAGCAAG | |||||
| AAGCAGACTTGACCTGA | |||||
| Class 2 integron | 491 | 55 | [ | ||
| CGGGATCCCGGACGGCATGCACGATTTGTA | |||||
| GATGCCATCGCAAGTACGAG | |||||
| Resistance to ampicillin by detection of four β-lactamase genes | CGCTTCCCGTTAACAAGTAC | 419 | 57 | [ | |
| CTGGTTCATTTCAGATAGCG | |||||
| TGGCCAGAACTGACAGGCAAA | 462 | 64 | [ | ||
| TTTCTCCTGAACGTGGCTGGC | |||||
| AGGAAGAGTATGATTCAACA | 535 | 55 | [ | ||
| CTCGTCGTTTGGTATGGC | |||||
| ACCAGATTCAACTTTCAA | 590 | 55 | [ | ||
| TCTTGGCTTTTATGCTTG | |||||
| Resistance to ciprofloxacin by detection of four fluoroquinolone plasmid mediated quinolone resistance genes | AGAGGATTTCTCACGCCAGG | 580 | 54 | [ | |
| TGCCAGGCACAGATCTTGAC | |||||
| GATCGTGAAAGCCAGAAAGG | 476 | 53 | [ | ||
| ATGAGCAACGATGCCTGGTA | |||||
| GGGTTGTACATTTATTGAATCG | 307 | 53 | [ | ||
| CACCTACCCATTTATTTTCA | |||||
| GCAAGTTCATTGAACAGGGT | 428 | 54 | [ | ||
| TCTAAACCGTCGAGTTCGGCG | |||||
| Resistance to chloramphenicol by detection of four phenicol resistance genes | AACCCGCCCTCTGGATCAAGTCAA | 548 | 60 | [ | |
| CAAATCACGGGCCACGCTGTATC | |||||
| CTTGTCGCCTTGCGTATAAT | 508 | 55 | [ | ||
| ATCCCAATGGCATCGTAAAG | |||||
| AACGGCATGATGAACCTGAA | 547 | 55 | [ | ||
| ATCCCAATGGCATCGTAAAG | |||||
| CGCCACGGTGTTGTTGTTAT | 394 | 55 | [ | ||
| GCGACCTGCGTAAATGTCAC | |||||
| Resistance to sulfonamide by detection of two dihydropteroate reductase genes | GCG CGG CGT GGG CTA CCT | 350 | 65 | [ | |
| GATTTCCGCGACACCGAGACAA | |||||
| CGG CAT CGT CAA CAT AACC | 720 | 52 | [ | ||
| GTG TGC GGA TGA AGT CAG | |||||
| Resistance to tetracycline by detection of three efflux pump genes | GCTACATCCTGCTTGCCTTC | 210 | 55 | [ | |
| CATAGATCGCCGTGAAGAGG | |||||
| TTGGTTAGGGGCAAGTTTTG | 659 | 55 | [ | ||
| GTAATGGGCCAATAACACCG | |||||
| CAG CTTTCG GATTCT TACGG | 844 | 55 | [ | ||
| GAT TGGTGA GGCTCG TTAGC | |||||
| Resistance to trimethoprim by detection of five dihydrofolate reductase genes | AAGAATGGAGTTATCGGGAATG | 391 | 50 | [ | |
| GGGTAAAAACTGGCCTAAAATTG | |||||
| CTGCAAAAGCGAAAAACGG | 432 | 50 | [ | ||
| AGCAATAGTTAATGTTTGAGCTAAAG | |||||
| GGTAATGGCCCTGATATCCC | 265 | 50 | [ | ||
| TGTAGATTTGACCGCCACC | |||||
| TCTAAACATGATTGTCGCTGTC | 452 | 50 | [ | ||
| TTGTTTTCAGTAATGGTCGGG | |||||
| CAGGTGAGCAGAAGATTTTT | 294 | 50 | [ | ||
| CCTCAAAGGTTTGATGTACC |
Figure 1Dendrogram based on Pulsed-Field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of 75 non-typhoidal Salmonella from poultry from Uganda. A cutoff level of 97% similarity defines a PFGE profile. For each isolate the isolate number, PFGE profile, serotype, farm, size of farm, district, phenotypic resistance (Ci; ciprofloxacin, S; sulphonamide, Te; tetracycline, Tm; trimethoprim, St; sulphamethoxazole_trimethoprim, Cl; chloramphenicol, Am; ampicillin) and identified genotypic resistance genes (qnrS, sul1, tetA, dhfrI, dhfrVII, cmlA, blaTEM-1, integrons, dfrA15, aadA1) have been included.