Literature DB >> 29437617

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Safety of Antistaphylococcal Penicillins Compared to Cefazolin.

Khalid Eljaaly1,2, Samah Alshehri3,2, Brian L Erstad2.   

Abstract

Recent studies and experience suggest that cefazolin might be equally as effective as antistaphylococcal penicillins for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), with a better safety profile and lower cost. The objective of these meta-analyses was to compare the safeties of antistaphylococcal penicillins and cefazolin. The PubMed, Embase, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases and websites for clinical trial registries through 23 June 2017 were searched. In addition, recent abstracts from infectious disease and pharmacy conferences were reviewed. We estimated Peto odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. One analysis focused on hospitalized patients, and the other focused on outpatients. Eleven retrospective studies of hospitalized patients and three retrospective studies of outpatients were included. In hospitalized patients, lower rates of nephrotoxicity (Peto OR, 0.225; 95% CI, 0.127 to 0.513), acute interstitial nephritis (Peto OR, 0.189; 95% CI, 0.053 to 0.675), hepatotoxicity (Peto OR, 0.160; 95% CI, 0.066 to 0.387), and drug discontinuation due to adverse reactions (Peto OR, 0.192; 95% CI, 0.089 to 0.414) were found with cefazolin. In outpatients, lower rates of nephrotoxicity (Peto OR, 0.372; 95% CI, 0.192 to 0.722), hepatotoxicity (Peto OR, 0.313; 95% CI, 0.156 to 0.627), and hypersensitivity reactions (Peto OR, 0.372; 95% CI, 0.201 to 0.687) were observed with cefazolin. Compared to antistaphylococcal penicillins, cefazolin was associated with significant reductions in nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in hospitalized patients and outpatients. Additionally, cefazolin was associated with lower likelihoods of discontinuation due to side effects in hospitalized patients and hypersensitivity reactions in outpatients. Cefazolin should be considered a first-line option for patients with MSSA infections for which efficacy is presumed to be similar to that of antistaphylococcal penicillin therapy.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MSSA; antistaphylococcal penicillins; cefazolin; nafcillin; oxacillin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29437617      PMCID: PMC5913998          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01816-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  25 in total

1.  Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Leonard A Mermel; Michael Allon; Emilio Bouza; Donald E Craven; Patricia Flynn; Naomi P O'Grady; Issam I Raad; Bart J A Rijnders; Robert J Sherertz; David K Warren
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Prevalence of blaZ gene types and the inoculum effect with cefazolin among bloodstream isolates of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  D J Livorsi; E Crispell; S W Satola; E M Burd; R Jerris; Y F Wang; M M Farley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children.

Authors:  Catherine Liu; Arnold Bayer; Sara E Cosgrove; Robert S Daum; Scott K Fridkin; Rachel J Gorwitz; Sheldon L Kaplan; Adolf W Karchmer; Donald P Levine; Barbara E Murray; Michael J Rybak; David A Talan; Henry F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Clinical experiences with cefazolin and other cephalosporins in bacterial endocarditis.

Authors:  E L Quinn; D Pohlod; T Madhavan; K Burch; E Fisher; F Cox
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Outcomes of ceftriaxone use compared to standard of therapy in methicillin susceptible staphylococcal aureus (MSSA) bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Ursula C Patel; Erin L McKissic; Douglas Kasper; Joseph R Lentino; Constance T Pachucki; Todd Lee; Bert K Lopansri
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-09-04

Review 6.  Infective Endocarditis in Adults: Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Larry M Baddour; Walter R Wilson; Arnold S Bayer; Vance G Fowler; Imad M Tleyjeh; Michael J Rybak; Bruno Barsic; Peter B Lockhart; Michael H Gewitz; Matthew E Levison; Ann F Bolger; James M Steckelberg; Robert S Baltimore; Anne M Fink; Patrick O'Gara; Kathryn A Taubert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Comparative Effectiveness of Cefazolin Versus Nafcillin or Oxacillin for Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Infections Complicated by Bacteremia: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jennifer S McDanel; Mary-Claire Roghmann; Eli N Perencevich; Michael E Ohl; Michihiko Goto; Daniel J Livorsi; Makoto Jones; Justin P Albertson; Rajeshwari Nair; Amy M J O'Shea; Marin L Schweizer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 8.  β-Lactam Therapy for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Comparative Review of Cefazolin versus Antistaphylococcal Penicillins.

Authors:  Julius Li; Kelly L Echevarria; Kristi A Traugott
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.705

9.  Relapse of type A beta-lactamase-producing Staphylococcus aureus native valve endocarditis during cefazolin therapy: revisiting the issue.

Authors:  Esteban C Nannini; Kavindra V Singh; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Outcome and attributable mortality in critically Ill patients with bacteremia involving methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Stijn I Blot; Koenraad H Vandewoude; Eric A Hoste; Francis A Colardyn
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-28
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Focusing the Lens on the CAMERA Concepts: Early Combination β-Lactam and Vancomycin Therapy in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  H Andrew Wilsey; Donna R Burgess; David S Burgess
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Disproportionality Analysis of Safety with Nafcillin and Oxacillin with the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Authors:  Tristan T Timbrook; Lydia McKay; Jesse D Sutton; Emily S Spivak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  The Emerging Role of β-Lactams in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  Kyle C Molina; Taylor Morrisette; Matthew A Miller; Vanthida Huang; Douglas N Fish
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparative Effectiveness of Exclusive Exposure to Nafcillin or Oxacillin, Cefazolin, Piperacillin/Tazobactam, and Fluoroquinolones Among a National Cohort of Veterans With Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection.

Authors:  Maya Beganovic; Jaclyn A Cusumano; Vrishali Lopes; Kerry L LaPlante; Aisling R Caffrey
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 5.  Current Paradigms of Combination Therapy in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia: Does it Work, Which Combination, and For Which Patients?

Authors:  Warren Rose; Michael Fantl; Matthew Geriak; Victor Nizet; George Sakoulas
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 6.  Cephalosporins: A Focus on Side Chains and β-Lactam Cross-Reactivity.

Authors:  Saira B Chaudhry; Michael P Veve; Jamie L Wagner
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-29

7.  The Cost-effectiveness of Cefazolin Compared With Antistaphylococcal Penicillins for the Treatment of Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  Elina Eleftheria Pliakos; Panayiotis D Ziakas; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 8.  Efficacy and safety of cefazolin versus antistaphylococcal penicillins for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changcheng Shi; Yubo Xiao; Qi Zhang; Qingyu Li; Fei Wang; Jing Wu; Nengming Lin
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Adjuvant β-Lactam Therapy Combined with Vancomycin or Daptomycin for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chunjiang Wang; Chao Ye; Linglong Liao; Zhaohui Wang; Ying Hu; Chao Deng; Liang Liu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Clinical Outcomes of an Innovative Cefazolin Delivery Program for MSSA Infections in OPAT.

Authors:  Laura Herrera-Hidalgo; Rafael Luque-Márquez; Aristides de Alarcon; Ana Belén Guisado-Gil; Belen Gutierrez-Gutierrez; Maria Dolores Navarro-Amuedo; Julia Praena-Segovia; Juan Manuel Carmona-Caballero; Elena Fraile-Ramos; Alicia Gutierrez-Valencia; Luis Eduardo Lopez-Cortes; Maria Victoria Gil-Navarro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.