Literature DB >> 29437381

Optimizing Nanoelectrode Arrays for Scalable Intracellular Electrophysiology.

Jeffrey Abbott, Tianyang Ye, Donhee Ham, Hongkun Park1.   

Abstract

Electrode technology for electrophysiology has a long history of innovation, with some decisive steps including the development of the voltage-clamp measurement technique by Hodgkin and Huxley in the 1940s and the invention of the patch clamp electrode by Neher and Sakmann in the 1970s. The high-precision intracellular recording enabled by the patch clamp electrode has since been a gold standard in studying the fundamental cellular processes underlying the electrical activities of neurons and other excitable cells. One logical next step would then be to parallelize these intracellular electrodes, since simultaneous intracellular recording from a large number of cells will benefit the study of complex neuronal networks and will increase the throughput of electrophysiological screening from basic neurobiology laboratories to the pharmaceutical industry. Patch clamp electrodes, however, are not built for parallelization; as for now, only ∼10 patch measurements in parallel are possible. It has long been envisioned that nanoscale electrodes may help meet this challenge. First, nanoscale electrodes were shown to enable intracellular access. Second, because their size scale is within the normal reach of the standard top-down fabrication, the nanoelectrodes can be scaled into a large array for parallelization. Third, such a nanoelectrode array can be monolithically integrated with complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) electronics to facilitate the large array operation and the recording of the signals from a massive number of cells. These are some of the central ideas that have motivated the research activity into nanoelectrode electrophysiology, and these past years have seen fruitful developments. This Account aims to synthesize these findings so as to provide a useful reference. Summing up from the recent studies, we will first elucidate the morphology and associated electrical properties of the interface between a nanoelectrode and a cellular membrane, clarifying how the nanoelectrode attains intracellular access. This understanding will be translated into a circuit model for the nanobio interface, which we will then use to lay out the strategies for improving the interface. The intracellular interface of the nanoelectrode is currently inferior to that of the patch clamp electrode; reaching this benchmark will be an exciting challenge that involves optimization of electrode geometries, materials, chemical modifications, electroporation protocols, and recording/stimulation electronics, as we describe in the Account. Another important theme of this Account, beyond the optimization of the individual nanoelectrode-cell interface, is the scalability of the nanoscale electrodes. We will discuss this theme using a recent development from our groups as an example, where an array of ca. 1000 nanoelectrode pixels fabricated on a CMOS integrated circuit chip performs parallel intracellular recording from a few hundreds of cardiomyocytes, which marks a new milestone in electrophysiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29437381     DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  14 in total

1.  An organic transistor matrix for multipoint intracellular action potential recording.

Authors:  Yasutoshi Jimbo; Daisuke Sasaki; Takashi Ohya; Sunghoon Lee; Wonryung Lee; Faezeh Arab Hassani; Tomoyuki Yokota; Katsuhisa Matsuura; Shinjiro Umezu; Tatsuya Shimizu; Takao Someya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Tutorial: using nanoneedles for intracellular delivery.

Authors:  Ciro Chiappini; Yaping Chen; Stella Aslanoglou; Anna Mariano; Valentina Mollo; Huanwen Mu; Enrica De Rosa; Gen He; Ennio Tasciotti; Xi Xie; Francesca Santoro; Wenting Zhao; Nicolas H Voelcker; Roey Elnathan
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 17.021

Review 3.  Semi-Implantable Bioelectronics.

Authors:  Jiaru Fang; Shuang Huang; Fanmao Liu; Gen He; Xiangling Li; Xinshuo Huang; Hui-Jiuan Chen; Xi Xie
Journal:  Nanomicro Lett       Date:  2022-05-28

4.  Nanocrown electrodes for parallel and robust intracellular recording of cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Zeinab Jahed; Yang Yang; Ching-Ting Tsai; Ethan P Foster; Allister F McGuire; Huaxiao Yang; Aofei Liu; Csaba Forro; Zen Yan; Xin Jiang; Ming-Tao Zhao; Wei Zhang; Xiao Li; Thomas Li; Annalisa Pawlosky; Joseph C Wu; Bianxiao Cui
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 5.  Nongenetic Optical Methods for Measuring and Modulating Neuronal Response.

Authors:  John F Zimmerman; Bozhi Tian
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Inorganic semiconductor biointerfaces.

Authors:  Yuanwen Jiang; Bozhi Tian
Journal:  Nat Rev Mater       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 66.308

7.  Optically transparent vertical silicon nanowire arrays for live-cell imaging.

Authors:  Roey Elnathan; Andrew W Holle; Jennifer Young; Marina A George; Omri Heifler; Andriy Goychuk; Erwin Frey; Ralf Kemkemer; Joachim P Spatz; Alon Kosloff; Fernando Patolsky; Nicolas H Voelcker
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 10.435

Review 8.  Nanotechnology: new opportunities for the development of patch-clamps.

Authors:  Jia Gao; Chunyang Liao; Sijin Liu; Tian Xia; Guibin Jiang
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 10.435

Review 9.  Endogenous Bioelectrics in Development, Cancer, and Regeneration: Drugs and Bioelectronic Devices as Electroceuticals for Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Michael Levin; John Selberg; Marco Rolandi
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2019-11-25

Review 10.  High-Aspect-Ratio Nanostructured Surfaces as Biological Metamaterials.

Authors:  Stuart G Higgins; Michele Becce; Alexis Belessiotis-Richards; Hyejeong Seong; Julia E Sero; Molly M Stevens
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 30.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.