Literature DB >> 2943705

Sensitizers and radiation dose fractionation: results and interpretations.

R P Hill.   

Abstract

Misonidazole is generally regarded as having been a clinical failure as a radiation sensitizer. It is hoped that the newer sensitizers SR-2508 and Ro 03-8799 will give better results because single dose studies with animal tumors have indicated that these two drugs give higher enhancement ratios than misonidazole at clinically tolerated doses. Other factors may also have influenced the clinical efficacy of misonidazole, however, particularly reoxygenation during the course of the fractionated treatments. In this paper reoxygenation in animal tumors and experimental studies in which fractionated radiation doses have been combined with sensitizers are reviewed. It is concluded that, even for dose fractions of 2 Gy, reoxygenation may not completely eliminate the influence of hypoxic cells on tumor response, when large total doses are given. Problems associated with tumor heterogeneity are also discussed to highlight the desirability of selecting the most suitable patients for clinical studies. Poorly reoxygenating tumors, rapidly growing tumors and tumors in patients in whom oxygen delivery to tissue is compromised are those whose control is most likely to be improved by combining radiation sensitizers with conventional treatment. However effective sensitizers should also allow fractionation schedules to be modified, to achieve a therapeutic gain, by taking advantage of differences in repair or repopulation between the tumor and critical normal tissue, without having to consider possible detrimental effects on reoxygenation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2943705     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(86)90223-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  8 in total

Review 1.  The changing paradigm of tumour response to irradiation.

Authors:  Richard P Hill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Tirapazamine: hypoxic cytotoxicity and interaction with radiation as assessed by the micronucleus assay.

Authors:  T Shibata; Y Shibamoto; K Sasai; N Oya; R Murata; T Takagi; M Hiraoka; M Takahashi; M Abe
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1996-07

3.  Numerical chromosomal instability mediates susceptibility to radiation treatment.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lilian Kabeche; Matthew D Wood; Christopher D Laucius; Dian Qu; Ashley M Laughney; Gloria E Reynolds; Raymond J Louie; Joanna Phillips; Denise A Chan; Bassem I Zaki; John P Murnane; Claudia Petritsch; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 4.  Hypoxia and drug resistance.

Authors:  B A Teicher
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.264

5.  Pharmacokinetics of varying doses of nicotinamide and tumour radiosensitisation with carbogen and nicotinamide: clinical considerations.

Authors:  A Rojas; R J Hodgkiss; M R Stratford; M F Dennis; H Johns
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Alteration of tumour response to radiation by interleukin-2 gene transfer.

Authors:  J Lee; J P Moran; B M Fenton; C J Koch; J G Frelinger; P C Keng; E M Lord
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Biomimetic nanoscale metal-organic framework harnesses hypoxia for effective cancer radiotherapy and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Kaiyuan Ni; Guangxu Lan; Yang Song; Ziyang Hao; Wenbin Lin
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 9.825

8.  Comparison of in vivo efficacy of hypoxic cytotoxin tirapazamine and hypoxic cell radiosensitizer KU-2285 in combination with single and fractionated irradiation.

Authors:  T Shibata; Y Shibamoto; K Sasai; N Oya; R Murata; T Takagi; M Hiraoka; M Abe
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1996-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.