Literature DB >> 29436843

Synthesis and substrate properties towards HIV-1 reverse transcriptase of new diphosphate analogues of 9-[(2-phosphonomethoxy)ethyl]adenine.

Wolfgang Hg Laux1, Stéphane Priet2, Karine Alvarez2, Suzanne Peyrottes1, Christian Périgaud1.   

Abstract

Background The replacement of β,γ-pyrophosphate by β,γ-phosphonate moieties within the triphosphate chain of 5'-triphosphate nucleoside analogues was previously studied for various antiviral nucleoside analogues such as AZT and 2',3'-dideoxynucleosides. Thus, it has been shown that these chemical modifications could preserve, in some cases, the terminating substrate properties of the triphosphate analogue for HIV-RT. Herein, we aimed to study such 5'-triphosphate mimics based on the scaffold of the well-known antiviral agent 9-[(2-phosphonomethoxy)ethyl]adenine (PMEA, Adefovir). Methods Synthesis involved coupling of a morpholidate derivative of PMEA with appropriate pyrophosphoryl analogues. The relative efficiencies of incorporation of the studied diphosphate phosphonates were measured using subtype B WT HIV-1 RT in an in vitro susceptibility assay, in comparison to the parent nucleotide analogue (PMEApp). Results Searching for nucleoside 5'-triphosphate mimics, we have synthesized and studied a series of diphosphate analogues of PMEA bearing non hydrolysable bonds between the and phosphorus atoms. We also examined their relative inhibitory capacity towards HIV-1 reverse transcriptase in comparison to the parent nucleotide analogue (PMEApp). Only one of them appeared as a weak inhibitor (IC50 = 403.0 ± 75.5 µM) and proved to be less effective than PMEApp (IC50 = 6.4 ± 0.8 µM). Conclusion PMEA diphosphoryl derivatives were designed as potential substrates and/or inhibitors of various viral polymerases. These modifications dramatically affect their ability to inhibit HIV-RT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (phosphomethoxy)ethyl]adenine; HIV-1 reverse transcriptase; antiviral; phosphonate diphosphate analogues

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29436843      PMCID: PMC5890543          DOI: 10.1177/2040206618757636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antivir Chem Chemother        ISSN: 0956-3202


Introduction

The acyclic nucleoside phosphonate 9-[2-(phosphomethoxy)ethyl]adenine (PMEA, Figure 1) exhibits a broad-spectrum activity against different types of DNA viruses and retroviruses.[1,2] Its orally bioavailable form, the bis(pivaloyloxymethyl) prodrug (bis(POM)PMEA, Adefovir dipivoxil), has been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B3 and other types of prodrugs are still under investigations.[4-6] To achieve its inhibitory effect on viral synthesis, PMEA must be converted intracellularly to its active diphosphorylated metabolite, PMEApp (Figure 1). PMEApp has been described to interact as an alternative substrate and as a competitive inhibitor of both herpes simplex type 1 (HSV-1) DNA polymerase[7,8] and reverse transcriptases.[9-11] Variable inhibitory effects on human cellular DNA polymerases were observed, especially against DNA polymerase for which Ki value was in the same range as dATP,[9,12-15] When compared to the affinity of PMEApp for HIV-RT (with Ki value in the nanomolar range), it may explain the antiviral selectivity of parent phosphonate.
Figure 1.

Chemical structures of PMEA, PMEApp 1a, and target diphosphate analogues 1b-j.

Chemical structures of PMEA, PMEApp 1a, and target diphosphate analogues 1b-j. As part of a research program, we decided to synthesize new nucleoside 5′-triphosphate mimics based on the PMEA scaffold and incorporating chemical modifications of the Pβ–O–Pγ phosphoester bonds. Replacement of the anhydride oxygen with isosteric groups leading to non-hydrolysable bonds, the resulting analogues were designed as biological tools for the study of substrate properties of cellular and/or viral enzymatic systems, as well as new potential therapeutic agents.[16,17] Based on previously published works on related topic,[16] requirements in the design of modified triphosphate analogues emerged: (i) the anhydride bond between β- and γ-phosphates, which is unaffected during the DNA biosynthesis, could be replaced with non-hydrolysable bond; (ii) similar modification could also be introduced between the 5′-position of sugar and the phosphorus atom; (iii) the anhydride bond between α- and β-P atoms should be preserved in order to provide the possibility of the mimetic to interact with targeted polymerase as substrate. In this respect, PMEApp constitutes an attractive model to study chemical modifications on the pyrophosphoryl residue due to its phosphonate structure, characterized by a stable P–C bond (toward phosphohydrolase-hydrolysis) between acyclic nucleoside moiety and α-phosphorus atom, and its broad and high affinity for viral polymerases. Herein, we report the full accounts of the synthesis of compounds 1b-j and their study as terminating substrates in the DNA chain elongation catalyzed by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reverse transcriptase.

Experimental section

Material and methods

1H NMR (250 MHz) and 13C NMR (100 MHz) spectra were recorded with proton decoupling at ambient temperature. Chemical shifts (δ) are quoted in parts per million (ppm) referenced to the residual solvent peak chloroform (CDCl3) at 7.26 ppm and 77.0 ppm, deuterium oxide (D2O) at 4.63 ppm relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS). COSY experiments were performed in order to confirm proton assignments as well as 2D 1H-13C heteronuclear COSY for the attribution of 13C signals. 13P NMR spectra were recorded at ambient temperature at 100 MHz. Chemical shifts are reported relative to external phosphoric acid (H3PO4). 19F NMR spectra were recorded at ambient temperature at 235 MHz. Chemical shifts are reported relative to external trichlorofluoromethane (CFCl3). Coupling constants, J, are given in Hertz. FAB mass spectra were recorded in the negative-ion mode using glycerol/thioglycerol (1:1, v/v, G-T) as matrix. Only nominal mass of ions corresponding to the mass of the lightest chlorine or bromine isotopes is given. However, the halogen-isotope peak intensity patterns were ascertained and they agreed with the formula of the ions. Thin layer chromatography was performed on precoated aluminum sheets of Silica Gel 60 F254 (Merck, Art. 5554), visualization of products was accomplished by UV absorbance followed by spraying with Hanes molybdate reagent. Column chromatography was carried out on Silica Gel 60 (Merck, Art. 9385). Analytical HPLC studies were performed using a reverse-phase analytical column (Nucleosil, C18, 150 × 4.6 mm, 5 m) equipped with a prefilter, a precolumn (Nucleosil, C18, 5 m), and a photodiode array detector. Compounds were eluted under isocratic conditions with 0.4% acetonitrile in 50 mM triethylammonium acetate buffer with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. All moisture sensitive reactions were carried out in anhydrous conditions under argon atmosphere using oven-dried glassware. Solvents were dried and distilled prior to use and solids were dried over P2O5 under reduced pressure at rt.

Chemistry

9-[(2-Phosphomethoxy)ethyl]-adenine (PMEA) and its phosp. horomorpholidate derivative 2 were synthesized according to a published procedure.[18] The tributylammonium salts of pyrophosphate 3a and diphosphonic acids 3b-d were obtained fromtheir commercially available forms: tetra sodium pyrophosphate decahydrate, tetra sodium imidodiphosphonate, methanediphosphonic acid and 1-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonic acid, respectively. The halomethylidene diphosphonic acids 3e-j were obtained from their ethyl esters precursors following a usual way,[19] and stored as sodium forms after passage over a Dowex 50WX2 cation exchange resin column and freeze-drying. Tetraethyl methylenediphosphonate 4 was commercially available. The halomethylene diphosphonate esters 5e, 5g, 6f and 6h were prepared using literature methods.[20] Detailed description of experimental procedures and compound characterization are provided as supplementary data.

In vitro drug susceptibility assays with recombinant subtype B WT HIV-1 RT

The p66RTB gene construct allowing the bacterial expression of the wild-type (WT) HIV-1 RT was described elsewhere.[21,22] The recombinant clade B WT HIV-1 RT was co-expressed with HIV-1 protease in Escherichia coli in order to obtain p66/p51 heterodimers, which were later purified using affinity chromatography. Enzymes were quantitated by active-site titration before biochemical studies. Standard RT activity was assayed using 250 µg/mL of activated calf thymus DNA (GE Healthcare). To determine IC50 values, reactions were performed with 10 nM enzyme and 5 µM each dNTP as a mixture (dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP) containing 100 µCi/mmol of [3H]-labelled deoxythymidine 5'-triphosphate (Perkin Elmer), for 15 min with increasing amounts of phosphonate, compounds 1a (PMEApp as reference), 1c, 1e to 1j. Each aliquot was spotted in duplicate on DE81 ion-exchange paper discs. Paper discs were washed twice with 0.3 M ammonium formate, pH 8.0, twice with water and once with ethanol, and then dried and transferred into sample bags. Scintillation fluid was added and the radioactivity bound to the discs was determined by liquid scintillation counting with MicroBeta Trilux Counter. Values of IC50 are the average from at least three independent experiments and were determined using Kaleidagraph data.

Molecular modeling of HIV-1 RT in complex with diphosphate phosphonate analogues 1c, 1e, 1g, 1i

All models were based on the X-ray structure of the RT in complex with dsDNA and incoming PMPApp (PDB code 1T05). The UCSF Chimera software (PMID: 15264254) was used to replace the PMP – moiety by the PME – equivalent. Moreover, the oxygen of the β,γ bridge of the diphosphate phosphonate PMPApp was replaced by CH2 (compound 1c), CCl2 (compound 1e), CBr2 (compound 1g) and CF2 (compound 1i) groups.

Results

The synthesis of PMEA diphosphate 1a and its mimetics 1b-j was carried out according to a general procedure (Scheme 1),[23,24] which requires preliminary preparation of the phosphoromorpholidate derivative 2 of PMEA. This was accomplished by usual reaction of PMEA with morpholine and N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide as activating agent.[18] Isolated as its 4-morpholine N,N'-dicyclohexylcarboxamidinium salt, 2 was further condensed with the appropriate tributylammonium salts of the diphosphonic acids 3b-j. The imido- and methylene-diphosphonate reagents 3b-d were commercially available as sodium or acidic forms. The halomethylidene diphosphonic acids 3e-h were prepared from the commercial tetraethyl methylenediphosphonate, following a published procedure.[20] Preparation of the fluorinated diphosphonic acids 3i, j has previously been described from direct halogenation of tetra alkyl methylenediphosphonates[19] or nucleophilic substitution of an appropriate halomethylphosphonate derivative by a phosphite anion.[25-27]
Scheme 1.

Final step in the synthesis of PMEApp 1a, and target diphosphate analogues 1b-j.

Final step in the synthesis of PMEApp 1a, and target diphosphate analogues 1b-j. Moreover, in contrast to the dichloro- and dibromo-analogues (3e-h), nucleophilic dehalogenation of difluoromethylene-diphosphonates into the corresponding monofluoro esters by conventional methods[28,29] was unsuccessful. In such conditions, P–C bond cleavage was observed resulting in the formation of dialkyl difluoromethylphosphonates. Thus, we decided to select the first approach (i.e. direct halogenation) leading in one step to a mixture of the mono- and difluoro- compounds through reaction of electrophilic fluorinating reagents with the carbanions of alkyl methylidenediphosphonates. Reported methodologies used perchloryl fluoride[19] or acetyl hypofluorite.[30] Herein, N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide was chosen as commercially available and easy handling fluorinating reagent.[31] Consequently, tetraethyl methylenediphosphonate 4 was deprotonated by the action of potassium tert-butoxide and treated with N-fluorobenzene-sulfonimide (Scheme 2). Purification of the resulting mixture on flash silica gel chromatography yielded 29% of the starting material 4 and 31% of each desired mono- and dihalogenated species 5i and 6j, respectively. Saponification of the tetraethyl fluoromethylenediphosphonate esters 5i and 6j was carried out using bromotrimethylsilane to give rise to the fluorinated diphosphonic acids 3i, j.
Scheme 2.

Synthesis of the mono- and difluorobisphosphonic acids 3i, j.

Synthesis of the mono- and difluorobisphosphonic acids 3i, j. Crude reaction of the phosphoromorpholidate derivative of PMEA 2 with pyrophosphate 3a or the appropriate tributylammonium salts of the diphosphonic acids 3b-j was firstly purified by a Dowex 1X2 chromatography using a gradient of aqueous lithium chloride in 0.01 M hydrochloric acid.[18] Then, DEAE-Sephadex A25 chromatography gave PMEA diphosphate 1a and its mimetics 1b-j. The low yield obtained for derivative 1b (18%) was probably due to the chemical instability of the imido functionality[32] during purification step at acidic pH. Structures of the different mimetics of PMEA diphosphate were assigned on the basis of their NMR data (Tables 1 and 2), MS and UV spectra. Purity was checked by analytical high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and high resolution mass spectra (HRMS).
Table 1.

Selected 13P NMR data of the new PMEA diphosphate mimetics 1b-j.

Chemical shifts (ppm)
Coupling constants (Hz)
CompoundδPαδPβδPγ 2 Jαβ 2 Jβγ
1a9.4−19.6−4.324.918.1
1b9.7−6.20.725.65.2
1c9.214.713.729.27.5
1d9.916.417.636.132.2
1e9.83.99.534.915.8
1f9.47.910.331.15.2
1g9.84.29.334.413.3
1h9.37.19.931.23.9
1i10.1−3.83.933.859.0
1j9.56.88.631.312.2
Table 2.

Selected 13C and 19F NMR data of the new PMEA diphosphate mimetics 1c-j.

Chemical shifts (ppm)
Coupling constants (Hz)
CompoundδCδF2JFC2JFPβ2JFPγ
1c30.8
1d72.4
1e78.0
1f49.5
1g57.4
1h38.2
1i118.7−120.3273.787.779.4
1j89.3−218.6180.564.855.6
Selected 13P NMR data of the new PMEA diphosphate mimetics 1b-j. Selected 13C and 19F NMR data of the new PMEA diphosphate mimetics 1c-j. To evaluate the inhibitory activity of diphosphate phosphonates 1a, 1c, 1e to 1j on the reverse transcriptase (RT) of HIV-1, their relative efficiencies of incorporation were measured using subtype B WT HIV-1 RT in an in vitro susceptibility assay. The calculated 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values obtained in this assay showed that PMEApp 1a is active (IC50 = 6.4 ± 0.8 µM), this value was in agreement with literature data,[33] whereas the diphosphate phosphonate analogues are truly less potent (IC50 >1000 µM or IC50 = 403.0 ± 75.5 µM for compound 1i).

Discussion

The synthesis of new mimics of PMEApp incorporating non hydrolysable bond between the β- and γ-P atoms has been carried out by reaction of the morpholidate derivative of PMEA 2 with the appropriate diphosphinic acids 3b-j (Scheme 1). The target diphosphate analogues 1b-j were isolated as lithium forms in 18–65% yields. The 13P NMR spectra of the mimetic phosphonates 1b-j showed characteristic downfield shifts which permitted, from a straightforward comparison with literature data, the direct assignment of resonances for α-, β- and γ-phosphorus atoms (Table 1). The α-P resonance was relatively independent of the substituent nature between β and γ phosphorus atoms. Compared to the parent phosphate, the phosphorusphosphorus coupling constant [2]Jαβ was generally increased through these changes and did not appear to correlate with the electronegativity of the substituents. The resonance for β-P was upfield from α-P for all analogues excepted the methylene and hydroxyethylidene derivatives 1c,d. The difluoromethylene and the hydroxyethylidene derivatives 1d,i showed a large value for the [2]Jβγ coupling constant. In contrast, the [2]Jβγ coupling constants for the dihalogenomethylene analogues 1e,g were in the same range as the parent phosphate. Moreover, published 13P NMR data for diphosphate analogues bearing a β,γ-methylene bridge substituted with bulky and anionic functions did not shown an increase of the [2]Jβγ coupling constant.[34] This unusual degree of electronic interaction between β and γ the phosphorus atoms, previously reported in other series for difluoromethylene diphosphate analogues,[35-37] reflects a complex set factors including the combined electronegativity and dπ-bonding possibilities for a β-P ligand which may led to conformational changes in the phosphoryl chain.[35] The resonance of carbon atom between β-P and γ-P showed a normal dependence to the electronegativity of substituent (Table 2). The downfield shifts increased in the series δ(CF2) > δ(CHF) > δ(CCl2) > δ(COHCH3) > δ(CBr2) > δ(CHCl) > δ(CHBr) > δ(CH2). Finally, a single fluorine resonance was observed in 19F NMR spectra for both the difluoromethylene compound 1i (δ −120.3 ppm, dd) and the mixture of diastereoisomeric monofluoromethylene compounds 1j (δ −218.6 ppm, ddd) showing that the fluorine environments could be considered as magnetically equivalent. Coupling constants were different for the two phosphorus nuclei directly bonded to the fluorinated β,γ-methylene bridge. [2]JFP values for coupling with Pβ were greater than those for coupling with Pγ. The substrate properties of these PMEA diphosphoryl derivatives were comparatively studied, in cell free solutions, towards HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Indeed, it has been previously shown in various nucleotide series that chemical modifications on 5′-phosphate residues could preserve, in some cases, the terminating substrate properties of the triphosphate analogue in the DNA biosynthesis catalyzed by different polymerases.[17,38-40] The substitution of β,γ-pyrophosphate by β,γ-phosphonates was rather systematically studied for a series of antiviral nucleoside analogues (AZT and 2′,3′-dideoxynucleosides)[41,42] including modification of the triphosphate chain at the - position and presents some similarity with the compounds under study. Thus, in the particular case of (R)P- boranonucleotide analogues of AZT, the order of activity towards the inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase is CF2 = O ≫ CHF > CCl2 > NH > CH2,[41] showing that the β,γ-difluoromethylene modification is effective and comparable to that of a natural bridge. However, the results obtained here demonstrate that none of the compounds 1b-j showed substrate properties towards HIV-1 reverse transcriptase till the concentration of 100 M (as example IC50 values for 1a and 1i were 6.4 ± 0.8 µM and 403 ± 75 µM, respectively). Even so, it is unpredictable, modifications of the nucleotide (either the sugar, base or 5’-triphosphate moieties) may affect its substrate activity through the modulation of its binding in the active site of the target enzyme or its incorporation. Several factors including size, polarity, and electronegativity may modulate the activity, even so a certain tolerance of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase to the γ-P-substituents was demonstrated in literature.[42] To understand why diphosphate phosphonates analogues 1c, 1e, 1g and 1j are poor substrates of HIV-1 RT in comparison to PMEApp 1a, we performed modeling replacing the oxygen of the β,δ bridge of the diphosphate phosphonate by CH2, CCl2, CBr2 or CF2 groups, with respect to specific geometry and bond distances. According to Tuske et al.,43 amino acids R72 and K65, and D113 to a lesser extent, play a key role in the binding of the nucleotide in the active site and in their incorporation by HIV-1 RT (Figure 2(a)). If the substitution of oxygen atom of the, β,γ-pyrophosphate bond by a methylene group (CH2), i.e. compound 1c (Figure 2(b)), does not cause steric hindrance. However, the interaction with K65 (protonated form in the catalytic site) is lost and is responsible for nucleotide destabilization and discrimination. Indeed, the modification of its binding at the RT active site misaligns reactive centers and hampers the nucleophilic attack at the catalytic step of incorporation into viral DNA. When the O of the β,γ bridge is substituted by CCl2 or CBr2, respectively, in compounds 1e and 1g, the major drawback observed is the steric hindrance (Figure 2(c) and (d)). Indeed, distances between analogues 1e and 1g and amino acids K65 and D113 are less than 1.8 Å and this close vicinity is prompted to destabilize complex between the nucleotide and HIV-1 RT. When the O of the bridge is replaced by a CF2, i.e. compound 1i, the activity is somewhat restored. The steric hindrance is rather acceptable (Figure 2(c)) and distances with amino acids K65 and D113 are around 2.4 Å. The main benefit is that CF2 modification can establish electrostatic interactions with K65, counterbalancing the negative effect of the β,γ bridge modification.
Figure 2.

(a) Structure of HIV-1 RT active site in complex with PMPApp. (b), (c), (d) and (e) models for the putative positioning of acyclic diphosphate phosphonates 1c, 1e, 1g, 1i in the active site of HIV-1 RT. The atomic coordinates (PDB 1T05 – HIV-1 RT in complex with PMPApp) were used to visualize the complex HIV-1 RT- diphosphate phosphonate, after modeling, replacing PMP- moiety by PME- one and the oxygen of the, bridge of the diphosphate phosphonate by CH2, CCl2, CBr2 or CF2 groups, respecting specific geometry and bond distances. One magnesium ion is represented as green sphere. Amino acid R72 and the second magnesium ion are intentionally omitted for figure clarity. (a) Structure 1T05: distances between the O of the, bridge and amino acids K65 and D113 are mentioned in dotted line. (c) and (d) steric hindrance is mentioned in full line. (e) Interactions are mentioned in dotted line.

(a) Structure of HIV-1 RT active site in complex with PMPApp. (b), (c), (d) and (e) models for the putative positioning of acyclic diphosphate phosphonates 1c, 1e, 1g, 1i in the active site of HIV-1 RT. The atomic coordinates (PDB 1T05 – HIV-1 RT in complex with PMPApp) were used to visualize the complex HIV-1 RT- diphosphate phosphonate, after modeling, replacing PMP- moiety by PME- one and the oxygen of the, bridge of the diphosphate phosphonate by CH2, CCl2, CBr2 or CF2 groups, respecting specific geometry and bond distances. One magnesium ion is represented as green sphere. Amino acid R72 and the second magnesium ion are intentionally omitted for figure clarity. (a) Structure 1T05: distances between the O of the, bridge and amino acids K65 and D113 are mentioned in dotted line. (c) and (d) steric hindrance is mentioned in full line. (e) Interactions are mentioned in dotted line. Another important remark is the difference that can be observed when comparing the crystallographic data from complexes of HIV-RT with purine or pyrimidine nucleotides. With purine nucleotides, as PMPApp, the amino acid R72 plays a crucial role in stacking the nucleobase, while only the amino acid R65 interacts with the O of the β,γ bridge. With pyrimidine nucleotides, their binding in the RT active site is slightly different, both amino acids R72 and K65 interact with the O of the α,β bridge and consequently the binding of the nucleotide is less sensible to the chemical modification of the bridge. This may explain why the modified phosphonate analogues of AZT are recognized and substrates for HIV-1 RT.[41] Thus, they are efficiently incorporated in the growing nucleic acid chain.

Conclusion

Nine diphosphate analogues of PMEA have been designed as isostere of the parent diphosphorylated form, PMEApp. The benefit of stable P–C bonds replacing scissile P–O–C linkage constitutes an attractive interest to evaluate the electronic and stereochemical requirements for binding to relevant proteins. It was observed that HIV-RT does not extend the DNA primer with the synthesized compounds. Within this acyclic series, the replacement of the β,γ bridge of the diphosphate phosphonate by CH2, CHCl, CCl2, CHBr, CBr2, CHF or CF2 groups has a drastic effect on the recognition by the HIV-RT. Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material
  20 in total

1.  The valine-to-threonine 75 substitution in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase and its relation with stavudine resistance.

Authors:  B Selmi; J Boretto; J M Navarro; J Sire; S Longhi; C Guerreiro; L Mulard; S Sarfati; B Canard
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-12-27       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  (Difluoromethylene)phosphates of guanine nucleosides as probes of DNA polymerases and G proteins.

Authors:  L Arabshahi; N N Khan; M Butler; T Noonan; N C Brown; G E Wright
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1990-07-24       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Inhibition of avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase by diphosphates of acyclic phosphonylmethyl nucleotide analogues.

Authors:  I Votruba; M Trávnícek; I Rosenberg; M Otmar; A Merta; H Hrebabecký; A Holý
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.970

4.  2'-Deoxynucleoside 5'-triphosphates modified at alpha-, beta- and gamma-phosphates as substrates for DNA polymerases.

Authors:  L A Alexandrova; A Y Skoblov; M V Jasko; L S Victorova; A A Krayevsky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Inhibition of herpes simplex virus DNA polymerase by diphosphates of acyclic phosphonylmethoxyalkyl nucleotide analogues.

Authors:  A Merta; I Votruba; I Rosenberg; M Otmar; H Hrebabecký; R Bernaerts; A Holý
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.970

6.  Enzymatic synthesis of acyclic nucleoside thiophosphonate diphosphates: effect of the α-phosphorus configuration on HIV-1 RT activity.

Authors:  Stéphane Priet; Loic Roux; Magali Saez-Ayala; François Ferron; Bruno Canard; Karine Alvarez
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.970

7.  Design and synthesis of novel bis(L-amino acid) ester prodrugs of 9-[2-(phosphonomethoxy)ethyl]adenine (PMEA) with improved anti-HBV activity.

Authors:  Xiaozhong Fu; Saihong Jiang; Chuan Li; Jian Xin; Yushe Yang; Ruyun Ji
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Herpes simplex virus-specified DNA polymerase is the target for the antiviral action of 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)adenine.

Authors:  S A Foster; J Cerny; Y C Cheng
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-01-05       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel oxazaphosphorine prodrugs of 9-(2-phosphonomethoxyethyl)adenine (PMEA, adefovir) as potent HBV inhibitors.

Authors:  Peng Lu; Jiangxia Liu; Yuya Wang; Xiaoyan Chen; Yushe Yang; Ruyun Ji
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 10.  Antiviral drugs in current clinical use.

Authors:  Erik De Clercq
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.168

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.