Literature DB >> 29436519

Low-intensity focused ultrasound alters the latency and spatial patterns of sensory-evoked cortical responses in vivo.

Jonathan A N Fisher1, Iryna Gumenchuk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The use of transcranial, low intensity focused ultrasound (FUS) is an emerging neuromodulation technology that shows promise for both therapeutic and research applications. Among many, one of the most exciting applications is the use of FUS to rehabilitate or augment human sensory capabilities. While there is compelling empirical evidence demonstrating this capability, basic questions regarding the spatiotemporal extent of the modulatory effects remain. Our objective was to assess the basic, yet often overlooked hypothesis that FUS in fact alters sensory-evoked neural activity within the region of the cerebral cortex at the beam's focus. APPROACH: To address this knowledge gap, we developed an approach to optically interrogate patterns of neural activity in the cortex directly at the acoustic focus, in vivo. Implementing simultaneous wide-field optical imaging and FUS stimulation in mice, our experiments probed somatosensory-evoked electrical activity through the use of voltage sensitive dyes (VSDs) and, in transgenic mice expressing GCaMP6f, monitored associated Ca2+ responses. MAIN
RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that low-intensity FUS alters both the kinetics and spatial patterns of neural activity in primary somatosensory cortex at the acoustic focus. When preceded by 1 s of pulsed ultrasound at intensities below 1 W cm-2 (I sppa), the onset of sensory-evoked cortical responses occurred 3.0  ±  0.7 ms earlier and altered the surface spatial morphology of Ca2+ responses. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings support the heretofore unconfirmed assumption that FUS-induced sensory modulation reflects, at least in part, altered reactivity in primary sensory cortex at the site of sonication. The findings are significant given the interest in using FUS to target and alter spatial aspects of sensory receptive fields on the cerebral cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29436519     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aaaee1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  5 in total

Review 1.  Low-Intensity Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation: Mechanisms of Action and Rationale for Future Applications in Movement Disorders.

Authors:  Andrea Guerra; Matteo Bologna
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-07

2.  Reversible neuroinhibition by focused ultrasound is mediated by a thermal mechanism.

Authors:  David P Darrow; Parker O'Brien; Thomas J Richner; Theoden I Netoff; Emad S Ebbini
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 3.  Ultrasound Neuromodulation: A Review of Results, Mechanisms and Safety.

Authors:  Joseph Blackmore; Shamit Shrivastava; Jerome Sallet; Chris R Butler; Robin O Cleveland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Therapeutic Potential of Ultrasound Neuromodulation in Decreasing Neuropathic Pain: Clinical and Experimental Evidence.

Authors:  Iván Pérez-Neri; Alberto González-Aguilar; Hugo Sandoval; Carlos Pineda; Camilo Ríos
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 7.363

5.  High-resolution fluorescence-guided transcranial ultrasound mapping in the live mouse brain.

Authors:  Hector Estrada; Justine Robin; Ali Özbek; Zhenyue Chen; Anne Marowsky; Quanyu Zhou; Daniel Beck; Beau le Roy; Michael Arand; Shy Shoham; Daniel Razansky
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.