Literature DB >> 29435873

Oncologic outcomes for open and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Koichi Kido1, Shingo Hatakeyama2, Naoki Fujita1, Hayato Yamamoto1, Yuki Tobisawa1, Tohru Yoneyama3, Takahiro Yoneyama1, Yasuhiro Hashimoto3, Takuya Koie1, Ikuya Iwabuchi4, Masaru Ogasawara4, Toshiaki Kawaguchi4, Chikara Ohyama1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oncologic benefits of laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LNU) are unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of surgical approach for radical nephroureterectomy on oncologic outcomes in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).
METHODS: Of 426 patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy at five medical centers between February 1995 and February 2017, we retrospectively investigated oncological outcomes in 229 with locally advanced UTUC (stages cT3-4 and/or cN+). The surgical approach was classified as open nephroureterectomy (ONU) or LNU, and oncologic outcomes, including intravesical recurrence-free survival (RFS), visceral RFS, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS), were compared between the groups. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox-regression analyses was performed to evaluate the impact of LNU on the prognosis.
RESULTS: Of the 229 patients, 48 (21%) underwent LNU. There were significant differences in patient backgrounds, including preoperative renal function, lymph-node involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and surgical margins, between the groups. Before the background adjustment, intravesical RFS, visceral RFS, CSS, and OS were significantly inferior in the ONU group than in the LNU group. However, in the IPTW-adjusted Cox-regression analysis, no significant differences were observed in intravesical RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; P = 0.476), visceral RFS (HR, 0.46; P = 0.109), CSS (HR, 0.48; P = 0.233), and OS (HR, 0.40; P = 0.147).
CONCLUSION: Surgical approaches were not independently associated with prognosis in patients with locally advanced UTUC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic; Oncologic outcome; Radical nephroureterectomy; Upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29435873     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-1248-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  24 in total

1.  Oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy: results from an international cohort.

Authors:  Thomas J Walton; Giacomo Novara; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Wassim Kassouf; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Walter Artibani; Patrick J Bastian; Juan I Martínez-Salamanca; Christian Seitz; Stephen A Thomas; Vincenzo Ficarra; Maximilian Burger; Stefan Tritschler; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  A consensus definition of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Matthew D Galsky; Noah M Hahn; Jonathan Rosenberg; Guru Sonpavde; Thomas Hutson; William K Oh; Robert Dreicer; Nicholas Vogelzang; Cora Sternberg; Dean F Bajorin; Joaquim Bellmunt
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Evidenced-based clinical practice guideline for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (summary--Japanese Urological Association, 2014 edition).

Authors:  Mototsugu Oya; Eiji Kikuchi
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 3.369

4.  Essential content of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for bladder cancer: The Japanese Urological Association 2015 update.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Kubota; Noboru Nakaigawa
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2016-07-03       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Multi-institutional validation of the ability of preoperative hydronephrosis to predict advanced pathologic tumor stage in upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jamie C Messer; John D Terrell; Michael P Herman; Casey K Ng; Douglas S Scherr; Benjamin Scoll; Stephen A Boorjian; Robert G Uzzo; Mark Wille; Scott E Eggener; Steven M Lucas; Yair Lotan; Shahrokh F Shariat; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Comparison of oncologic outcomes for open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of 1249 cases.

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Shahrokh F Shariat; Hendrik Isbarn; Alon Weizer; Mesut Remzi; Marco Roscigno; Eiji Kikuchi; Jay D Raman; Christian Bolenz; Karim Bensalah; Theresa M Koppie; Wassim Kassouf; Mario I Fernández; Philipp Ströbel; Jeffrey Wheat; Richard Zigeuner; Cord Langner; Matthias Waldert; Mototsugu Oya; Charles C Guo; Casey Ng; Francesco Montorsi; Christopher G Wood; Vitaly Margulis; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephroureterectomy in Muscle-Invasive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Subanalysis of the Multi-Institutional National Database of the Japanese Urological Association.

Authors:  Jun Miyazaki; Hiroyuki Nishiyama; Hiroyuki Fujimoto; Chikara Ohyama; Takuya Koie; Shiro Hinotsu; Eiji Kikuchi; Mizuaki Sakura; Junichi Inokuchi; Tomohiko Hara
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan.

Authors:  Seiichi Matsuo; Enyu Imai; Masaru Horio; Yoshinari Yasuda; Kimio Tomita; Kosaku Nitta; Kunihiro Yamagata; Yasuhiko Tomino; Hitoshi Yokoyama; Akira Hishida
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 9.  Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy versus open nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Su Zhang; You Luo; Cheng Wang; Sheng-Jun Fu; Li Yang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  12 in total

1.  Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results from three high-volume robotic surgery institutions.

Authors:  Ruben De Groote; Karel Decaestecker; Alessandro Larcher; Sarah Buelens; Elise De Bleser; Frederiek D'Hondt; Peter Schatteman; Nicolaas Lumen; Francesco Montorsi; Alexandreμ Mottrie; Geert De Naeyer
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-04-30

2.  Postoperative weight loss followed by radical cystectomy predicts poor prognosis in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Kazutaka Okita; Shingo Hatakeyama; Naoki Fujita; Sakae Konishi; Hayato Yamamoto; Atsushi Imai; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Hiroyuki Ito; Kazuaki Yoshikawa; Takuya Koie; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Comparison of axitinib and sunitinib as first-line therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a real-world multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Sakae Konishi; Shingo Hatakeyama; Toshiaki Tanaka; Yoshinori Ikehata; Toshikazu Tanaka; Naoki Fujita; Yusuke Ishibashi; Hayato Yamamoto; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Kazuaki Yoshikawa; Toshiaki Kawaguchi; Naoya Masumori; Hiroshi Kitamura; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Influence of pretreatment quality of life on prognosis in patients with urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Sappaya Suppanuntaroek; Shingo Hatakeyama; Naoki Fujita; Yuka Kubota; Yuichiro Suzuki; Teppei Okamoto; Yuki Tobisawa; Tohru Yoneyama; Hayato Yamamoto; Kazuyuki Mori; Atsushi Imai; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Risk-stratified surveillance protocol improves cost-effectiveness after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Masaki Momota; Shingo Hatakeyama; Hayato Yamamoto; Hiromichi Iwamura; Yuki Tobisawa; Tohru Yoneyama; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Takuya Koie; Ikuya Iwabuchi; Masaru Ogasawara; Toshiaki Kawaguchi; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-05-01

6.  Comparison of oncological and perioperative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic nephroureterectomy approaches in patients with non-metastatic upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Hakmin Lee; Hak Ju Kim; Sang Eun Lee; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Lymphadenectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Igor Duquesne; Idir Ouzaid; Yohann Loriot; Marco Moschini; Evanguelos Xylinas
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Laparoscopy versus Open Nephroureterectomy in Prognostic Outcome of Patients with Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Sung Han Kim; Mi Kyung Song; Jung Kwon Kim; Bumsik Hong; Seok Ho Kang; Ja Hyeon Ku; Byong Chang Jeong; Ho Kyung Seo
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 9.  Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Radosław Piszczek; Łukasz Nowak; Wojciech Krajewski; Joanna Chorbińska; Sławomir Poletajew; Marco Moschini; Krzysztof Kaliszewski; Romuald Zdrojowy
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  Asymptomatic recurrence detection and cost-effectiveness in urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiromichi Iwamura; Shingo Hatakeyama; Makoto Sato; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.