Napa Parinyanitikul1, Walailuk Tanpipattanakul2, Nattaya Poovorawan2, Thanapoom Rattananupong3, Poranee Laoitthi3, Piyada Sithidetphaiboon2, Suebpong Thanasanvimon2, Virote Sriuranpong2. 1. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Napaparinyanitikul@gmail.com. 2. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. 3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Premedication with dexamethasone is an essential part of the prevention of hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) associated with taxane administration. However, the possibility of stopping dexamethasone premedication has been investigated in previous studies to reduce the steroid's adverse events; however, either the result or the particular protocol was limited. Thus, our study aimed to evaluate the incidence of HSR after dexamethasone premedication discontinuation after lack of HSR in two previous weekly paclitaxel infusions. METHOD: Early breast cancer patients who received adjuvant weekly paclitaxel in a retrospective cohort from January 2012 through February 2016 at the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital were reviewed. All patients received a standard premedication protocol prior to the first and second paclitaxel infusion. Dexamethasone was omitted in later cycles in all patients who did not undergo infusion HSR. Patients who developed HSR during the first or second cycles of paclitaxel infusion were excluded. The incidence of HSR during the later cycle of paclitaxel administration and factors associated with this adverse reaction were collected. RESULTS: Eighty-one of 85 patients who did not undergo infusion HSR after 2 cycles of weekly paclitaxel administration were retrospectively reviewed. The median age was 51 years (range 27-74 years). Only 16% of the patients had a BMI greater than 30 kg/m2, 57.8% were premenopausal, 67.9% had no comorbidity, none had a history of allergy or asthma, 65.4% received weekly paclitaxel as a single agent, and 34.6% received weekly paclitaxel in combination with trastuzumab. Five of 81 patients reported grade I-II HSR (6.25%), which occurred mostly during the first 6 cycles (60%). Temporary discontinuation of paclitaxel infusion was observed in all HSR patients. No differences regarding age, BMI, menopausal status, and underlying disease between the HSR and no HSR groups were identified. Concerning the safety profile, peripheral neuropathy (gr I 60%, gr II 13.5%, and gr III 2.4%), myalgia (43.4%), and edema (10.5%) were commonly reported, whereas dyspepsia (5.3%) and insomnia (14.5%) were rarely described in withholding patients. CONCLUSION: Withholding dexamethasone premedication in non-experiencing HSR patients after two previous cycles of weekly paclitaxel administration was safe and did not impact the higher incidence of HSR. A discontinuing dexamethasone protocol should be recommended generally in these patients, especially those with a high risk for steroid-induced side effects.
BACKGROUND: Premedication with dexamethasone is an essential part of the prevention of hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) associated with taxane administration. However, the possibility of stopping dexamethasone premedication has been investigated in previous studies to reduce the steroid's adverse events; however, either the result or the particular protocol was limited. Thus, our study aimed to evaluate the incidence of HSR after dexamethasone premedication discontinuation after lack of HSR in two previous weekly paclitaxel infusions. METHOD: Early breast cancerpatients who received adjuvant weekly paclitaxel in a retrospective cohort from January 2012 through February 2016 at the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital were reviewed. All patients received a standard premedication protocol prior to the first and second paclitaxel infusion. Dexamethasone was omitted in later cycles in all patients who did not undergo infusion HSR. Patients who developed HSR during the first or second cycles of paclitaxel infusion were excluded. The incidence of HSR during the later cycle of paclitaxel administration and factors associated with this adverse reaction were collected. RESULTS: Eighty-one of 85 patients who did not undergo infusion HSR after 2 cycles of weekly paclitaxel administration were retrospectively reviewed. The median age was 51 years (range 27-74 years). Only 16% of the patients had a BMI greater than 30 kg/m2, 57.8% were premenopausal, 67.9% had no comorbidity, none had a history of allergy or asthma, 65.4% received weekly paclitaxel as a single agent, and 34.6% received weekly paclitaxel in combination with trastuzumab. Five of 81 patients reported grade I-II HSR (6.25%), which occurred mostly during the first 6 cycles (60%). Temporary discontinuation of paclitaxel infusion was observed in all HSR patients. No differences regarding age, BMI, menopausal status, and underlying disease between the HSR and no HSR groups were identified. Concerning the safety profile, peripheral neuropathy (gr I 60%, gr II 13.5%, and gr III 2.4%), myalgia (43.4%), and edema (10.5%) were commonly reported, whereas dyspepsia (5.3%) and insomnia (14.5%) were rarely described in withholding patients. CONCLUSION: Withholding dexamethasone premedication in non-experiencing HSR patients after two previous cycles of weekly paclitaxel administration was safe and did not impact the higher incidence of HSR. A discontinuing dexamethasone protocol should be recommended generally in these patients, especially those with a high risk for steroid-induced side effects.
Authors: M A Bookman; W P McGuire; D Kilpatrick; E Keenan; W M Hogan; S W Johnson; P O'Dwyer; E Rowinsky; H H Gallion; R F Ozols Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Elisa Piovano; E Pivetta; P Modaffari; F Martra; C Baima Poma; S Perotto; E Tripodi; V Zanfagnin; P Zola; A Ferrero Journal: Gynecol Obstet Invest Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; K D Swenerton; L Gianni; J Myles; M E van der Burg; I Kerr; J B Vermorken; K Buser; N Colombo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R B Weiss; R C Donehower; P H Wiernik; T Ohnuma; R J Gralla; D L Trump; J R Baker; D A Van Echo; D D Von Hoff; B Leyland-Jones Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1990-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael J Berger; Leslie J Dunlea; Amy E Rettig; Maryam B Lustberg; Gary S Phillips; Charles L Shapiro Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-11-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Samuel Dubinsky; Deep Patel; Xiang Wang; Amirrtha Srikanthan; Terry L Ng; Corey Tsang Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-02-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Romualdo Barroso-Sousa; Ines Vaz-Luis; Antonio Di Meglio; Jiani Hu; Tianyu Li; Rebecca Rees; Natalie Sinclair; Lindsey Milisits; Jose Pablo Leone; Michael Constantine; Meredith Faggen; Frederick Briccetti; Caroline Block; Ann Partridge; Harold Burstein; Adrienne G Waks; Nabihah Tayob; Lorenzo Trippa; Sara M Tolaney; Michael J Hassett; Eric P Winer; Nancy U Lin Journal: Oncologist Date: 2021-09-24