| Literature DB >> 29435463 |
Roma Pahwa1,2, Miriam Balderas3,4, Ishwarlal Jialal1,2, Xinpu Chen3,4, Ruth Ann Luna3,4, Sridevi Devaraj3,4.
Abstract
AIMS: Diabetes is a proinflammatory state, evidenced by increased pattern recognition receptors and the inflammasome (NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain (NLRP)) complex. Recent reports have elucidated the role of the gut microbiome in diabetes, but there is limited data on the gut microbiome in NLRP-KO mice and its effect on diabetes-induced inflammation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29435463 PMCID: PMC5804379 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6519785
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Res Impact factor: 4.011
Baseline characteristics.
| WT ( | WT-STZ ( | NLRP3-KO STZ ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 35.1 ± 3.1 | 28.9 ± 2.5∗ | 30.5 ± 3.1 |
| Plasma glucose (mg/dl) | 181.3 ± 48.5 | 916.3 ± 482.6∗ | 393.7 ± 310.3∗ |
Data are presented as mean ± SD. ∗p < 0.05 versus WT. #p < 0.05 versus WT-STZ.
Biomarkers of inflammation.
| WT ( | WT-STZ ( | NLRP-KO STZ ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAA ( | 56 (45, 66) | 110 (91, 132)∗ | 50 (19, 63)# |
| IL-18 (pg/ml) | 18 (15, 22) | 71 (57, 88)∗ | 54 (12, 64)# |
Data are presented as median (25th percentile, 75th percentile). ∗p < 0.05 versus WT. #p < 0.005 versus WT-STZ.
Figure 1(a) Rarefaction curves demonstrating the Shannon index (evenness and richness metric) of the OTUs identified for the three groups: WT control, WT STZ, and NLRP3-KO STZ. Rarefaction of the OTU table was set to 794. Curves suggest no significant differences in alpha diversity. (b) Rarefaction curve using the Chao1 index for the three groups: WT control, WT STZ, and NLRP3-KO STZ, calculated using QIIME 1.7. Rarefaction of the OTU table was set to 794. Curves suggest no differences in alpha diversity.
Figure 2(a) PCoA plot of the WT group by unweighted UniFrac distances. Analyses were determined using QIIME 1.7. The axes represent the first highest discriminating axes using the Bray-Curtis distance measure. (b) PCoA plot of the treatment groups by unweighted UniFrac distances. Analyses were determined using QIIME 1.7. The axes represent the first highest discriminating axes using the Bray-Curtis distance measure.
Figure 3(a) The taxonomic distribution of the WT control, WT STZ, and NLRP3-KO STZ groups is represented as the percent abundance of the identified phyla for each group. Analyses were determined using QIIME 1.7, and raw data was entered into GraphPad Prism to generate a stacked bar plot. (b) The taxonomic distribution of the WT control, WT STZ, and NLRP3-KO STZ groups is represented as the percent abundance of the identified genera for each group. Analyses were determined using QIIME 1.7, and raw data was entered into GraphPad Prism to generate a stacked bar plot.