Literature DB >> 29435009

Karyopherin subunit-α 2 expression accelerates cell cycle progression by upregulating CCNB2 and CDK1 in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Chun-Lin Gao1, Gao-Wei Wang1, Guan-Qin Yang1, Hong Yang2, Li Zhuang1.   

Abstract

Different types of cancer exhibit distinct gene expression profiles. The present study aimed to identify a specific gene dysregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that was essential for cancer progression. The whole transcriptomes of primary HCC tissue samples were analyzed with microarrays. The most significantly differentially expressed gene was identified, specifically karyopherin subunit-α 2 (KPNA2), and an analysis using the Oncomine online tool was performed with data from The Cancer Genome Atlas to predict associated genes in HCC. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed to confirm the gene expression levels of KPNA2, and the RNA interference knockdown of KPNA2 was performed to identify the effect on putative downstream target genes. A proliferation assay and flow cytometry analysis was used to assess the function of KPNA2 in the regulation of the cell cycle. The results demonstrated that KPNA2 expression was significantly upregulated in HCC tumor tissues compared with liver tissues and was associated with cyclin B2 (CCNB2) and cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) expression. KPNA2 expression was identified a novel marker to predict the outcome of patients. In addition, KPNA2 knockdown downregulated CCNB2 and CDK1, inhibited cell proliferation and induced cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that KPNA2 may promote tumor cell proliferation by increasing the expression of CCNB2/CDK1. KPNA2 could be a target for therapeutic intervention in HCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell cycle; cyclin B2/cyclin-dependent kinase 1; hepatocellular carcinoma; karyopherin subunit-α 2

Year:  2017        PMID: 29435009      PMCID: PMC5778818          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.7691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer which results in ~80% of mortalities associated with hepatic cancer (1). Surgical resection is the principal strategy for treatment of HCC. The results of chemotherapy are often unsatisfactory as liver cancer typically develops resistance to chemotherapy, which may be due to a number of reasons; for example, the rapid metabolism of liver cells may quickly inactivate chemotherapy drugs administered to patients with HCC (2). In addition, the factors which enable the progression of HCC remain unidentified, and non-targeted drugs are less effective at preventing cancer recurrence and metastasis (3). Karyopherin subunit-α 2 (KPNA2) is a nuclear transporter, allowing signal communication between the nucleus and cytoplasm (4). KPNA2 is required for cell survival (5); it may be mutated in cancer to enable disease progression (6). KPNA2 has been associated with the regulation of carcinogenesis, proliferation and recurrence in various cancer types, as previously reviewed (7). KPNA2 contributes to the relocation of DNA damage response proteins and has been associated with the prognosis of breast cancer (4). KPNA2 recognizes cargo with the nuclear location sequence (NLS) and may affect cancer cell progression by interacting with a number of transcriptional factors, including c-Myc and p53 (8). Additionally, the upregulation of KPNA2 increases the expression of octamer-binding transcription factor gene 4 (OCT4), which is associated with the stem-like properties and dedifferentiation of cancer cells (9). However, the association between KPNA2 and cancer progression has yet to be characterized and requires further study. In the present study, it was identified that KPNA2 may serve a function in the progression of HCC. The knockdown of KPNA2 expression was associated with the downregulation of cancer-associated genes in HCC cells, and high KPNA2 expression was associated with a significantly reduced overall and disease-free survival time in patients with HCC.

Materials and methods

Tumor samples

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Kunming, China) and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The patients had not received radiation or chemotherapy prior to surgery. HCC tissues were obtained from 6 patients (3 males and 3 females), aged between 55 and 65 years old (mean age, 62 years old) with non-metastatic disease during surgical resection from the Department of Oncology of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University between September 2013 and May 2014. Adjacent liver tissues were used as controls. All tissues were frozen with dry ice. RNA was extracted from the samples with TRIzol (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The gene expression profile was analyzed using GeneChip® Human Transcriptome Array 2.0 microarrays (Affymetrix; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The raw data were analyzed by using the affy package (version 1.55.0; Affymetrix; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in R (10). The robust multi-array average method was employed to corrects probe intensity values and the microarray data was then quantile-normalized (10) for the following comparisons. The normalized microarray data were analyzed using Multiple Experiment Viewer (version 4.9.0, http://mev.tm4.org/#/welcome).

Cell culture

The human HCC cell line Huh7 was purchased from the Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Cells were maintained in 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2 throughout the study.

RNA interference

Short interfering (si)RNA was synthesized by Jima Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); the si-KPNA2-1 sequence is UUACGAUUAUGUGGUCGACGG, si-KPNA2-2 is UUGUUUGGUUCCGACACCAUC and si-CTR is a commercial small RNA target with no sequence on known human gene. A total of 20 pmol siRNA was transfected using 3 µl RNAiMAX reagent/well (cat. no. 13778-100; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in 24-well plates (cells grown up to 70% confluence). Further analysis, as subsequently described, was performed at 48 h after transfection.

MTT assay

A CellTiter 96® non-radioactive cell proliferation assay (cat. no. G4000; Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) was used to analyze cell proliferation, according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, 8,000 Huh7 cells were seeded in 96-well plates. Alterations in cell confluence were observed at 24 and 48 h, followed by the addition of 15 µl Dye Solution to each well. Following a further incubation of 2–3 h, 100 µl Solubilizing Solution/Stop mix was added to each well and the absorbance was determined at wavelength of 570 nm on a 96-well plate reader.

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction

RNA was extracted from Huh7 cells using TRIzol, and reverse transcription was performed using the PrimeScript 1st strand cDNA Synthesis kit (cat. no. 6110A; Takara Bio, Inc., Otsu, Japan), according to the manufacturer's protocols. The SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix with Low ROX kit (cat. no. 1572-5211; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) was applied to quantify the mRNA expression level, according to the manufacturer's protocol. The primers used in qPCR were as follow: KPNA2 forward, CTGCAGGAAAACCGCAACAA and reverse, CCTGGCAGCTTGAGTAGCTT; CDK1 forward, TTTCTTTCGCGCTCTAGCCA and reverse, CAATCGGGTAGCCCGTAGAC; CCNB2 forward, GGCTGGTACAAGTCCAC-TCC and reverse, CTTCTTCCGGGAAACTGGCT; β-actin forward, GTCATTCC-AAATATGAGATGCGT and reverse, GCTATCACCTCCCCTGTGTG. Thermocycling protocol included pre-denatured at 95°C for 3 min, denaturation at 95°C for 15 sec, annealing at 60°C for 15 sec and extension at 72°C for 1 min for 40 cycles. The 2−ΔΔCq method was used for quantification of gene relative expression (11).

Cell cycle analysis

After cell transfection with siRNA for 24 h, the cells were dissociated using 0.25% trypsin in a 37°C cell incubator for 5 min. The detached cells were washed with PBS once and then fixed with cold 70% ethanol for 30 min at room temperature. Briefly, the cells were washed twice with PBS. The cells were treated with a final concentration of 5 µg/ml ribonuclease for 10 min at room temperature. Propidium iodide (PI) was added (10 µg/ml) and the cells were stained for 15 min at room temperature. The cells were analyzed using FACSCanto (BD Biosciences, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). A wavelength of 605 nm was selected to determine the fluorescence of PI.

Bioinformatic data mining

Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data was used. TCGA raw data was obtained and analyzed using the cBioportal (http://www.cbioportal.org/) and Oncomine (https://www.oncomine.org/) online tools. A total of 440 mRNA expression profiles for HCC (440 adjacent liver tissues were used as control tissues) were selected. The KPNA2 gene was input, with the cut-off for high/low expression level set at >1 standard deviation. To evaluate the hazard ratio of KPNA2, the OncoLnc (http://www.oncolnc.org/) was used to investigate the Cox coefficients of KPNA2 in HCC patients.

Statistical analysis

Pearson and Spearman correlation analysis were respectively performed to investigate the correlation between the KPNA2 and CDK1 as well as CCNB2. Cox's proportional hazards model was used for survival rate analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimator curves were plotted for survival analysis and a log-rank test was performed to determine the statistical significance of differences in survival between groups. GraphPad prism 7 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for data analysis. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Student's t-test was used to compare data between groups.

Results

KPNA2 mRNA expression is deregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues and associated with cell regulators

A total of 6 samples from patients with HCC were analyzed using microarrays. The mRNA expression of certain genes was upregulated compared with adjacent liver tissues in all tumor tissue samples; KPNA2 was the most significantly upregulated of all the differentially expressed genes (P<0.001; Fig. 1A). Therefore, the function of KPNA2 in the progression of malignant HCC was selected for further study. The Oncomine online tool was used to identify the correlation between the expression of KPNA2 and other identified genes from the TCGA tumor mRNA microarray data. In addition, the correlation in expression between KPNA2 and cell cycle-associated genes, including the cyclin family and CDKs, was analyzed. The results demonstrated that the expression of CCNB2 and CDK1 was correlated with KPNA2 (Fig. 1B). The mRNA expression levels of CCNB2 (P=5.06×10−25; Fig. 2A) and CDK1 (P=8.82×10−28; Fig. 2B) were significantly upregulated in the KPNA2 mRNA high expression group and the expression levels of CDK1 and CCNB2 were positively associated with the KPNA mRNA expression level (Fig. 2C and D).
Figure 1.

KPNA2 is upregulated in HCC tissues and correlated with CCNB2 and CDK1 expression. (A) A total of 6 HCC and non-tumor liver tissues were analyzed using microarrays, and the relative mRNA expression of KPNA2 was determined. (B) Analysis of KPNA2-associated genes with the Oncomine co-expression analysis tool. The mRNA expression levels of a number of genes, including CCNB2 and CDK1, were significantly correlated with KPNA2 expression. KPNA2, karyopherin subunit-α 2; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; CCNB2, cyclin B2; CDK1, cyclin-dependent kinase 1.

Figure 2.

Association between the mRNA expression levels of CNNB2/CDK1 and KPNA2 in HCC expression profiles from the Cancer Genome Atlas database, analyzed with the cBioportal enrichment tool. (A) CCNB2 and (B) CDK1 mRNA expression levels in the high and low KPNA2 groups. The mRNA expression levels of CCNB2 and CDK1 were upregulated in the high KPNA2 group. The correlation between the expression of KPNA2 with (C) CCNB2 and (D) CDK1. CCNB2 and CDK1 mRNA expression levels were significantly correlated with KPNA2 mRNA expression. CNNB2, cyclin B2; CDK1, cyclin-dependent kinase 1; KPNA2, karyopherin subunit-α 2.

Knockdown of KPNA2 affects the expression levels of CDK1 and cyclin B2, induces G2/M cell cycle arrest and inhibits cell proliferation

To identify the function of KPNA2 in hepatic tumor cell proliferation, siRNA was used to knockdown KPNA2 expression in Huh7 cells. The efficiency of the knockdown of KPNA2 in Huh7 cells was analyzed with RT-qPCR. It was demonstrated that the siRNA significantly reduced the KPNA2 mRNA level; the expression level of CCNB2 and CDK1 mRNA was simultaneously decreased (P<0.05; Fig. 3A). An MTT assay was performed to determine the effect of KPNA2 knockdown on Huh7 cell proliferation. The result demonstrated that KPNA2 knockdown significantly decreased the proliferative abilities of cells (P<0.05; Fig. 3B). As CDK1 and CCNB2 are associated with the regulation of the G2/M transition in the cell cycle, the effect of KPNA2 knockdown on cell cycle distribution was investigated using flow cytometry. The results suggested that knockdown of KPNA2 resulted in G2/M arrest in Huh7 cells (Fig. 3C and D).
Figure 3.

KPNA2 silencing inhibited HCC cell proliferation. (A) siRNA was used to knockdown KPNA2 in Huh7 cells, and the mRNA expression levels of KPNA2, CCNB2 and CDK1 were determined using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. KPNA2 knockdown was confirmed; the mRNA expression levels of CCNB2 and CDK1 were also reduced. (B) Cell proliferation was determined using an MTT assay following KPNA2 knockdown in Huh7 cells. The knockdown of KPNA2 reduced cell proliferation. (C) Flow cytometry was applied to determine the cell cycle distribution in Huh7 cells following KPNA2 interference. (D) Quantification of (C). Knockdown of KPNA2 prompted HCC cell arrest in the G2/M phase. *P<0.05. KPNA2, karyopherin subunit-α 2; si, small interfering; CNNB2, cyclin B2; CDK1, cyclin-dependent kinase 1; CTR, control; PI, propidium iodide.

Expression of KPNA2 in tumor tissues is negatively associated with the prognosis

The survival data associated with HCC expression profiles from TCGA was analyzed. The results demonstrated that patients with high KPNA2 expression exhibited significantly reduced overall (1.14×10−6; Fig. 4A) and disease-free survival time (6.07×10−4; Fig. 4B) compared with the patients with low KPNA2 expression. We submitted in OncoLnc (http://www.oncolnc.org). The hazard ratio for high KPNA2 expression in HCC was 0.617. It was then assessed whether the expression of the KPNA2-associated genes CDK1 and CCNB2 affected overall survival time. The overall survival time of patients exhibiting a relatively high level of CCNB2 (P=3.32×10−4; Fig. 4C) or CDK1 (P=8.58×10−6; Fig. 4D) was significantly reduced. The results revealed a role for KPNA2, CDK1 and CCNB2 expression in the progression of HCC.
Figure 4.

KPNA2 expression is negatively associated with patient overall and disease-free survival time. (A) Overall survival curve for patients with high and low KPNA2 expression. (B) Disease-free survival curve for patients with high and low KPNA2 expression. (C) Overall survival curve for patients with high and low CCNB2 expression. (D) Overall survival curve for patients with high and low CDK1 expression. All figure sections were generated using cBioportal. KPNA2, karyopherin-α; CNNB2, cyclin B2; CDK1, cyclin-dependent kinase 1.

Discussion

HCC occurs worldwide, and the diversity in the genetic backgrounds of patients with HCC may cause difficulty in identifying the genes that promote the progression of HCC (12). In the present study, tumor tissues were selected from 6 patients with HCC and analysis was performed using microarrays; it was identified that KPNA2 was the most significantly upregulated gene. Therefore, it was hypothesized that KPNA2 may promote cancer progression. TCGA is a public cancer research database containing high-throughput genome sequencing and transcriptome data to enable the study of cancer with bioinformatics tools. TCGA data was selected using the cBioportal and Oncomine online tools (13). To identify the genes associated with the KPNA2 gene in a wider HCC population. In the present study, the expression level of genes in the cyclin B family were demonstrated to be associated with the expression of KPNA2. Unrestricted cell growth and proliferation is a hallmark of cancer cells (14). In a normal cell, cell proliferation is precisely controlled by cell cyclins and CDKs (15). In the present study, CCNB2 and CDK1 were relatively abundant in tumor tissues and their expression was significantly correlated with KPNA2 expression. CDK1, also known as CDC2, binds cyclin B1 and B2 to promote G2/M transition (16). The dimerization of CCNB2 with CDK1 is an essential component of the cell cycle regulatory machinery (17). A previous study demonstrated that KPNA2 affected cancer progression by regulating DNA damage response protein subcellular location (4). The CDK1 amino acid sequence was analyzed and an NLS was identified (18), which may be recognized by KPNA2 to result in CDK1 nuclear transportation. Further study is required to characterize the process of CCNB2/CDK1 transcriptional activation, the effect on cell cycle progression and how this is associated with KPNA2. To validate an interaction between KPNA2, CCNB2 and CDK1 in HCC, Huh7 cells were selected. KPNA2 expression was silenced with siRNA. It was demonstrated that KPNA interference directly decreased the expression of cyclin B2 and CDK1 at the mRNA. In addition, it was revealed that cell proliferation was inhibited by KPNA interference. Therefore, the prediction of genes associated with genes, including KPNA2, using the cBioportal tool may be reliable, as the prediction result could be experimentally verified. Additionally, the present study aimed to determine whether KPNA2 was associated with the clinical prognosis for patients with HCC. Significant differences in overall and disease-free survival time were identified between patients with high and low KPNA2 expression; patients with high KPNA2 expression exhibited a relatively poor prognosis. In conclusion, the results of the present study revealed that high KPNA2 expression is a risk factor in HCC and that KPNA2 regulated the cell cycle checkpoint-associated proteins cyclin B2 and CDK1. Therefore, KPNA2 may be a novel therapeutic target in HCC.
  18 in total

1.  Truncated form of importin alpha identified in breast cancer cell inhibits nuclear import of p53.

Authors:  I S Kim; D H Kim; S M Han; M U Chin; H J Nam; H P Cho; S Y Choi; B J Song; E R Kim; Y S Bae; Y H Moon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-07-28       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  affy--analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level.

Authors:  Laurent Gautier; Leslie Cope; Benjamin M Bolstad; Rafael A Irizarry
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Hepatic cancer stem cells and drug resistance: Relevance in targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Caecilia Hc Sukowati; Natalia Rosso; Lory S Crocè; Claudio Tiribelli
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2010-03-27

5.  Global cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Freddie Bray; Rebecca L Siegel; Jacques Ferlay; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  KPNA2 is a nuclear export protein that contributes to aberrant localisation of key proteins and poor prognosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  A T Alshareeda; O H Negm; A R Green; C C Nolan; P Tighe; N Albarakati; R Sultana; S Madhusudan; I O Ellis; E A Rakha
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Downregulation of KPNA2 in non-small-cell lung cancer is associated with Oct4 expression.

Authors:  Xiao-Lei Li; Lan-Ling Jia; Mu-Mu Shi; Xin Li; Zhong-Hua Li; Hui-Feng Li; En-Hua Wang; Xin-Shan Jia
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 9.  Drug resistance in cancer: an overview.

Authors:  Genevieve Housman; Shannon Byler; Sarah Heerboth; Karolina Lapinska; Mckenna Longacre; Nicole Snyder; Sibaji Sarkar
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  The functional role of the novel biomarker karyopherin α 2 (KPNA2) in cancer.

Authors:  Anders Christiansen; Lars Dyrskjøt
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 8.679

View more
  32 in total

1.  Bioinformatic analysis reveals the key pathways and genes in early-onset breast cancer.

Authors:  Chuanlong Cui; Lun Li; Jing Zhen
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Establishment of a Genomic-Clinicopathologic Nomogram for Predicting Early Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After R0 Resection.

Authors:  Bin Yu; Han Liang; Qifa Ye; Yanfeng Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Zika virus NS2A protein induces the degradation of KPNA2 (karyopherin subunit alpha 2) via chaperone-mediated autophagy.

Authors:  Jia He; Liping Yang; Peixi Chang; Shixing Yang; Shaoli Lin; Qiyi Tang; Xinping Wang; Yan-Jin Zhang
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 16.016

4.  The Identification of Core Gene Expression Signature in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ning Li; Ling Li; Yongshun Chen
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2018-05-27       Impact factor: 6.543

5.  Bioinformatics Analysis based on Multiple Databases Identifies Hub Genes Associated with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Lu Zeng; Xiude Fan; Xiaoyun Wang; Huan Deng; Kun Zhang; Xiaoge Zhang; Shan He; Na Li; Qunying Han; Zhengwen Liu
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.236

6.  Identification of potential hub genes associated with the pathogenesis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma via integrated bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Ziqi Meng; Jiarui Wu; Xinkui Liu; Wei Zhou; Mengwei Ni; Shuyu Liu; Siyu Guo; Shanshan Jia; Jingyuan Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  The prognostic value of LINC01296 in pan-cancers and the molecular regulatory mechanism in hepatocellular carcinoma: a comprehensive study based on data mining, bioinformatics, and in vitro validation.

Authors:  Chaojie Liang; Yongping Zhang; Yu Zhang; Ruihuan Li; Zhimin Wang; Zhigang Wei; Jiansheng Guo
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Identification of a protein signature for predicting overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma: a study based on data mining.

Authors:  Zeng-Hong Wu; Dong-Liang Yang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Bioinformatics identification of crucial genes and pathways associated with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xueren Gao; Xixi Wang; Shulong Zhang
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Comprehensive analysis of potential prognostic genes for the construction of a competing endogenous RNA regulatory network in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Chaosen Yue; Yaoyao Ren; Hua Ge; Chaojie Liang; Yingchen Xu; Guangming Li; Jixiang Wu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.