Tomokazu Tanaka1, Harumasa Nakazawa1,2, Naohide Kuriyama1,2, Masao Kaneki1,2. 1. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA. 2. Department of Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Abstract
Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has successfully reduced the mortality rate of patients with human immune deficiency virus (HIV) and HIV protease inhibitors (HIV PIs) are key components of HAART. Complications of HAART, particularly those associated with HIV PIs including lipodystrophy and metabolic disturbance, have emerged as an important public health issue. No specific treatment is available to prevent and/or treat HIV PI-associated lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome. The present study demonstrated that a relatively low-dose of farnesyltransferase inhibitor (FTI), tipifarnib (3 mg/kg/day, subcutaneous injection) and lonafarnib (5 mg/kg/day, subcutaneous injection), prevented the onset of lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome induced by the combination of two HIV PIs, lopinavir (50 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneal injection) and ritonavir (12.5 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneal injection), in mice. Consistent with previous studies, treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir for 2 weeks decreased body weight, adipose tissue mass, levels of plasma adiponectin and leptin, and increased plasma levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol and insulin. Tipifarnib and lonafarnb prevented or ameliorated all of these alterations in the HIV PI-treated mice. These data identify FTIs as a novel potential strategy to prevent or treat HIV PI-associated lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome in HIV-infected patients on HAART.
Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has successfully reduced the mortality rate of patients with human immune deficiency virus (HIV) and HIV protease inhibitors (HIVPIs) are key components of HAART. Complications of HAART, particularly those associated with HIVPIs including lipodystrophy and metabolic disturbance, have emerged as an important public health issue. No specific treatment is available to prevent and/or treat HIV PI-associated lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome. The present study demonstrated that a relatively low-dose of farnesyltransferase inhibitor (FTI), tipifarnib (3 mg/kg/day, subcutaneous injection) and lonafarnib (5 mg/kg/day, subcutaneous injection), prevented the onset of lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome induced by the combination of two HIVPIs, lopinavir (50 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneal injection) and ritonavir (12.5 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneal injection), in mice. Consistent with previous studies, treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir for 2 weeks decreased body weight, adipose tissue mass, levels of plasma adiponectin and leptin, and increased plasma levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol and insulin. Tipifarnib and lonafarnb prevented or ameliorated all of these alterations in the HIV PI-treated mice. These data identify FTIs as a novel potential strategy to prevent or treat HIV PI-associated lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome in HIV-infectedpatients on HAART.
Entities:
Keywords:
AIDS; HIV protease inhibitor; farnesyltransferase inhibitor; lipodystrophy; metabolic syndrome
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (HIVPIs) are key components of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) to treat patients infected with HIV. HAART has been highly successful in controlling HIV replication and reducing the morbidity and mortality rates of patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) (1). However, significant adverse side effects are associated with long-term use of HIVPIs. Patients treated with HAART frequently develop a metabolic syndrome associated with partial lipodystrophy, hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance (2–4). The metabolic complications of HAART potentially increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in HIV-infectedpatients (4–6). Among others, HIVPIs are considered to serve a pivotal role in the development of HAART-related metabolic complications. Therefore, HIV PI-associated lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome has emerged as an important public health issue. The number of patients with HIV diagnosed with cardiovascular disease been increasing and the metabolic complications of HAART are considered to be contributing to this increase (7,8).In 2015, World Health Organization issued a new guideline on antiretroviral therapy (ART) against HIV. The new guideline recommends that ART be initiated as soon as HIV infection is detected regardless of the progression of AIDS or reduced cluster of differentiation (CD) 4-positive cell count (9). This recommendation is based on evidence that earlier use of ART results in improved clinical outcomes (9). It is anticipated that a greater number of individuals living with HIV may be treated with HAART for a longer period of time by implementing this novel guideline worldwide. However, no specific treatment is currently available for the prevention and/or reversal of HAART-related metabolic complications. For example statins, as inhibitors of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase, are effective at reducing high cholesterol levels and have been prescribed to patients with HIV receiving HAART (10,11). However, there are also a number of weaknesses and drawbacks of statin use to treat HIV PI-related metabolic syndrome. Statins increase the incidence of type II diabetes (12) and drug-drug interactions exist between some statins and HIVPIs (13). Statins are not capable of effectively improving insulin sensitivity or ameliorating lipodystrophy. In addition, statins are not so effective at reducing high triglyceride levels. Novel effective strategies to prevent or treat HAART-related metabolic complications are thus required.The molecular mechanism by which HAART and/or HIVPIs cause metabolic disturbance is not well understood. Among others, the inhibition of zinc metalloprotease ZMPSTE 24 by HIVPIs has been proposed to serve an important role in the development of HAART-associated lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome. ZMPSTE 24 is the key enzyme in the maturation of prelamin A, which is encoded by the LMNA gene and some mutations in the LMNA or ZMPSTE 24 gene cause lipodystrophy and premature aging syndrome such as Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) (14,15). Lipodystrophy is a major characteristic of HGPS (16).During the maturation process of prelamin A, following the farnesylation of prelamin A, ZMPSTE 24 cleaves farnesylated prelamin A (17–19). Protein farnesylation is a covalent attachment of farnesyl pyrophosphate to cysteine thiols in the CAAX motif located in the carboxyl terminus of proteins (‘C’ is cysteine, ‘A’ is aliphatic amino acid, and ‘X’ is any amino acid at the carboxyl terminus, but typically serine, methionine, glutamine or alanine.) (20,21). Protein farnesylation is catalyzed by farnesyltransferase (FTase) and promotes membrane translocation of the protein. Following this cleavage by ZMPSTE 24, mature lamin A no longer contains farnesylated cysteine (17–19). A previous study demonstrated that treatment with HIV PI, lopinavir (LPV), atazanavir or tipranavir, blocks ZMPSTE 24 activity and thereby accumulates farnesylated prelamin A in cultured fibroblasts (22). Accumulation of farnesylated prelamin A due to a genetic mutation in t LMNA or ZMPSTE 24 is considered to be a major factor in the pathogenesis of HGPS (23). Based on these data, the safety and efficacy of an FTase inhibitor (FTI), lonafarnib, has been assessed in ongoing clinical trials in pediatric patients with HGPS and promising results have been reported (24).Lipodystrophy is a common feature of HGPS and HAART-related complications, although there are substantial differences in the signs and symptoms of these two diseases. Together with previous results indicating that HIVPIs inhibit ZMPSTE 24 leading to the accumulation of farnesylation of prelamin A in cultured cells (22), these previous findings raise the possibility that FTIs may prevent the development of HIVPIs-induced lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome in addition to HGPS. A previous study determined that FTI-277 ameliorates the adverse effects of HIVPIs, ritonavir and the combination of LPV and ritonavir (RTV), in cultured human coronary artery endothelial cells (25). However, the effects of FTIs have not yet been studied in vivo in an animal model of HIV PI- or HAART-induced metabolic disturbances. Therefore, the present study demonstrates the preventive effects of relatively low doses of tipifarnib and lonafarnib, clinically applicable FTIs, on lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome induced by the combination of LPV and RTV in mice.
Materials and methods
Animal treatments
A total of 32 male C57BL/6 mice (22.0–25.4 g) at 8 weeks of age (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) were used in the present study. The mice were housed in a pathogen-free animal facility maintained at 25°C, with relative humidity of 50±10%, and illuminated by a 12-h light-dark cycle. The mice were provided with standard rodent chow and water ad libitum. The mice received daily intraperitoneal injections of 50 mg/kg/day LPV (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and 12.5 mg/kg/day RTV (Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX, USA) or vehicle (10% ethanol/15% propylene glycol in normal saline) alone for 2 weeks as previously described (26). Simultaneously, the mice were treated with daily subcutaneous injections of 3 mg/kg/day tipifarnib (R11577), 5 mg/kg/day lonafarnib (SCH66336) (both from Selleck Chemicals) or vehicle [5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in 0.1 ml normal saline] alone for 2 weeks. Therefore, the following 4 treatment groups were used in the current study (n=8 mice/group): Group 1, vehicle for LPV/RTV + vehicle for FTIs; group 2, LPV/RTV + vehicle for FTIs; group 3, LPV/RTV + tipifarnib; and group 4, LPV/RTV + lonafarnib. A total of 4 mice of each group were reared in the same cage. Lopinavir and ritonavir were diluted in a vehicle of 10% ethanol/15% propylene glycol in normal saline (26). Tipifarnib and lonafarnib were dissolved in DMSO at 10 mg/ml and then diluted in 0.1 ml normal saline. Just before the inception of treatment (day 1) and 7 (day 8) and 14 days (day 15) thereafter, blood glucose and body weight were measured. Blood glucose levels were measured using a blood glucose tester (Bayer Corporation, Mishawaka, IN, USA). Food intake was assessed on day 8 and day 15 by calculating the weekly loss of the chow provided to the mice. On day 15, following 4-h fasting, mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg; Lundbeck US, Deerfield, IL, USA) and adipose tissues (inguinal, epididymal, and retroperitoneal white adipose tissues and interscapular brown adipose tissue) were excised following laparotomy. The mice were then euthanized by exsanguination under anesthesia with pentobarbital sodium, and blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture. All experiments were completed in accordance with the institutional guidelines and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Massachusetts General Hospital (protocol no. 2015N000216; Charlestown, MA, USA). The animal care facility is accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care.
Biochemical assays
Plasma samples were obtained by centrifugation of the heparinized blood at 2,200 × g for 20 min at 4°C and stored at −80°C until the biochemical assays were performed. Levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, free fatty acids (also known as nonesterifiedfatty acids) in plasma were measured colorimetrically using commercially available kits [a LabAssay™ Triglyceride (cat no. 290-63701) for triglycerides, a cholesterol assay kit (cat no. 999-02601) for total cholesterol and a NEFA C kit (cat no. 279-75401) for free fatty acids; Wako Chemicals USA, Inc., Richmond, VA, USA). Insulin, adiponectin and leptin concentrations in plasma were evaluated by ELISA according to the manufacturer's assay protocols of commercially available kits [an Ultra Sensitive MouseInsulin ELISA kit (cat no. 90080) for insulin, a MouseAdiponectin ELISA kit (cat no. 80569) for adiponectin and a Mouse Leptin ELISA kit (cat no. 90030) for leptin (Crystal Chem, Inc., Downers Grove, IL, USA)].
Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed by an analysis of variance assay (ANOVA) using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). For comparison among the four groups, the data were compared with one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All data are expressed as means ± standard error of the mean.
Results
FTIs prevented LPV/RTV-induced decreases in body weight and adipose tissue mass in mice
Treatment with LPV/RTV, commonly used HIVPIs, for 2 weeks significantly decreased the body weight and mass of adipose tissues in mice including epididymal, inguinal and retroperitoneal white adipose tissues and interscapular brown adipose tissue compared with mice treated with vehicle alone (P<0.05; Fig. 1A). On day 7 following the inception of LPV/RTV treatment there was a trend toward decreased body weight in groups treated with LPV/RTV but no statistically significant difference was observed between the four groups. These results are in agreement with those of previous studies (26,27). Notably, the body weight loss induced by LPV/RTV was not associated with reduced food intake; food intake was significantly increased in the LPV/RTV group compared with the mice treated with vehicle alone (P<0.05; Fig. 1B) following two weeks treatment.
Figure 1.
Effects of FTIs on body weight and food intake in mice treated with LPV/RTV. (A) Treatment with LPV/RTV for 2 weeks significantly decreased body weight compared with vehicle alone. The effect of LPV/RTV on body weight was attenuated by FTIs: When the mice were co-treated with tipifarnib or lonafarnib, LPV/RTV failed to significantly decrease body weight. (B) LPV/RTV significantly increased food intake in the second week of the treatment compared with vehicle alone. FTIs prevented LPV/RTV-induced increased food intake. In the first week of the treatments, no significant difference in food intake between the groups was observed, although LPV/RTV tended to increase it. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs. LPV/RTV treatment, n=8 mice per group. FTI, farnesyltransferase inhibitor; LPV, lopinavir; RTV, ritonavir; NS, not significant.
Tipifarnib and lonafarnib prevented or ameliorated the LPV/RTV-induced decreases in body weight and fat mass (P<0.05; Fig. 2). Furthermore, the FTIs reversed the increased food intake in LPV/RTV-treated mice two weeks after treatment (P<0.01; Fig. 1B). There was no significant difference in food intake between the mice receiving the combination treatment with LPV/RTV and tipifarnib or LPV/RTV and lonafarnib and those receiving vehicle alone (Fig. 1B).
Figure 2.
Effects of FTIs on LPV/RTV-induced reduction in adipose tissue mass in mice. LPV/RTV significantly decreased the mass of adipose tissues including retroperitoneal, inguinal, and epididymal white adipose tissues and interscapular brown adipose tissue compared with vehicle alone. FTIs almost completely prevented the LPV/RTV-induced decrease in fat mass in all adipose tissues. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 vs. LPV/RTV treatment, n=8 mice per group. FTI, farnesyltransferase inhibitor; LPV, lopinavir; RTV, ritonavir.
FTIs prevented LPV/RTV-induced hyperlipidemia in mice
HIV PI-related lipodystrophy in patients infected with HIV is associated with hyperlipidemia (28,29). Similarly, LPV/RTV increased plasma levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol and free fatty acids in mice (Fig. 3), consistent with results of previous studies in mice (26,27). Tipifarnib and lonafarnib significantly prevented LPV/RTV-induced hypertriglyceridemia (P<0.05; Fig. 3A) and hypercholesterolemia (P<0.001; Fig. 3B). When the mice were co-treated with tipifarnib or lonafarnib, LPV/RTV failed to significantly increase circulating free fatty acids compared with mice treated with vehicle alone. There were trends toward decreased levels of free fatty acids by tipifarnib and lonafarnib in LPV/RTV-treated mice, but no statistically significant differences were observed (Fig. 3C).
Figure 3.
Effects of FTIs on LPV/RTV-induced hyperlipidemia in mice. LPV/RTV significantly increased plasma levels of (A) triglycerides, (B) total cholesterol and (C) free fatty acids compared with vehicle alone. When co-treated with tipifarnib or lonafarnib, LPV/RTV failed to significantly increase levels triglycerides, total cholesterol, or free fatty acids compared with vehicle alone. Tipifarnib and lonafarnib significantly decreased triglyceride and total cholesterol levels in LPV/RTV-treated mice to the levels observed in mice treated with vehicle alone. There were trends toward decreased levels of free fatty acids by the FTIs in mice treated LPV/RTV, but no statistically significant differences were observed between the mice treated with LPV/RTV alone and those co-treated with LPV/RTV and tipifarnib or LPV/RTV and lonafarnib. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 vs. LPV/RTV treatment, n=8 mice per group. FTI, farnesyltransferase inhibitor; LPV, lopinavir; RTV, ritonavir; NS, not significant.
FTIs reversed the effects of LPV/RTV on plasma insulin, adiponectin and leptin concentrations
Neither LPV/RTV nor FTIs altered blood glucose levels (Fig. 4A). By contrast, LPV/RTV significantly increased plasma insulin concentrations compared with vehicle alone (P<0.001; Fig. 4B). Tipifarnib and lonafarnib prevented hyperinsulinemia in LPV/RTV-treated mice (P<0.05; Fig. 4B). These results indicate that LPV/RTV induced insulin resistance in mice, which was reversed by the FTIs.
Figure 4.
Effects of FTIs on plasma insulin, adiponectin and leptin levels in mice treated with LPV/RTV. (A) No differences were observed in blood glucose levels between the groups. (B) LPV/RTV significantly increased plasma insulin concentrations compared with vehicle alone. Tipifarnib and lonafarnib significantly inhibited the LPV/RTV-induced increase in plasma insulin concentrations. Plasma insulin concentrations in the mice receiving the combination treatment of LPV/RTV and tipifarnib or LPV/RTV and lonafarnib did not significantly differ from those treated with vehicle alone, although plasma insulin concentrations appeared to be greater in the mice treated with LPV/RTV and FTI compared with vehicle alone. Treatment with LPV/RTV significantly decreased plasma (C) adiponectin and (D) leptin concentrations compared with vehicle alone. Tipifarnib and lonafarnib reversed the effects of LPV/RTV on adiponectin and leptin concentrations. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 vs. LPV/RTV treatment, n=8 mice per group. FTI, farnesyltransferase inhibitor; LPV, lopinavir; RTV, ritonavir; NS, not significant.
Consistent with the LPV/RTV-induced insulin resistance and its reversal by the FTIs, LPV/RTV significantly decreased plasma level of adiponectin (P<0.001), an insulin-sensitizing adipokine, and the FTIs restored plasma adiponectin concentrations to the levels observed in the mice receiving vehicle alone (Fig. 4C). Similarly, LPV/RTV decreased plasma leptin levels (P<0.05) and this decrease was reversed by tipifarnib and lonafarnib (Fig. 4D).
Discussion
The present study demonstrates that a relatively low-dose of tipifarnib and lonafarnib prevents LPV/RTV-induced reductions in body weight and adipose tissue mass, hyperlipidemia and hyperinsulinemia in mice. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study focusing on the effects of FTI on HIV PI- or HAART-related complications in vivo. The results of the current study suggest that FTIs may be capable of preventing or ameliorating HIV PI-associated lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome, including hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance, in patients with HIV undergoing treatment with HAART. It is indicated that protein farnesylation serves a role in the pathogenesis of HIV PI-induced metabolic disturbances in mice.Treatment with LPV/RTV decreased body weight in mice. It should be noted, however, that LPV/RTV significantly increased food intake. Therefore, the decreased body weight observed in the LPV/RTV-treated mice may not be accounted for by toxic effects of HIVPIs alone, and that it may be attributable to the metabolic changes induced by LPV/RTV. Increased food intake was associated with reduced plasma leptin levels in LPV/RTV-treated mice. Leptin is an adipokine that is secreted by adipocytes and inhibits appetite and food intake (30). Previous studies have demonstrated that the level of circulating leptin is associated with fat mass in mice and humans (30,31). It is therefore conceivable that fat mass loss may lead to decreased leptin production and secretion, which in turn, increases food intake in LPV/RTV-treated mice.Adiponectin is a major adipokine that promotes insulin sensitivity (32). The level of circulating adiponectin is closely associated with insulin sensitivity. It is reasonable to speculate, therefore, that decreased adiponectin levels may contribute to the onset of insulin resistance, as indicated by hyperinsulinemia, in LPV/RTV-treated mice. Notably, previous studies have indicated that circulating levels of leptin and adiponectin are significantly decreased in patients with HAART-related lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome (33–35).LPV/RTV was selected in the present study to induce lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome in mice based on the following reasons: The combination of LPV and RTV is a frequently used component of HAART for the treatment of HIV infection in adults, adolescents and children (36). In most, but not all countries, LTV/RTV is one of the preferred HIV PI treatments in the recommended second-line regimens (37). LPV/RTV treatment is associated with lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome in HIV-infectedpatients (38,39). Finally, to the best of our knowledge, the combination of LPV/RTV is the only HIV PI regimen that has been used to induce lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome in rodents (26,27).Clinically relevant doses of LPV (50 mg/kg/day) and RTV (12.5 mg/kg/day) in mice were used in the current study (26). The regular doses for daily oral treatment with LPV/RTV as a monotherapy or in combination with other ART in adult HIVpatients are LPV (400–800 mg/day or 10 mg/kg/day) and RTV (100–200 mg/day or 2.5 mg/kg/day) (40).The doses of the FTIs used in the current study, tipifarnib (3 mg/kg/day, subcutaneous injection) and lonafarnib (5 mg/kg/day, subcutaneous injection), appear much lower compared with those used in a mouse model of HGPS (tipifarnib 150 or 450 mg/kg/day, oral administration) (41). However, in clinical trials of lonafarnib in pediatric patients with HGPS (70–150 mg/m2 body surface area, twice daily, oral administration; Clinical Trials.gov identifiers: NCT00425607, NCT00879034, and NCT00916747), the differences in route of administration (subcutaneous injection vs. oral administration) and species (human vs. mouse) make precise comparisons difficult. Notably, previous clinical trials investigating patients with cancer and leukemia demonstrated the safety and tolerability of oral administration of tipifarnib (600 mg/day) and lonafarnib (250 mg/day) (42,43). Previous studies reported that the bioavailability of oral tipifarnib administration was ~27, 30 or 34% in healthy volunteers and/or patients with cancer (44–46). It is possible that higher doses of FTIs may be required to exert the protective effects in HGPS compared with LPV/RTV-induced lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome, as HGPS is a fatal disease and characterized by more serious symptoms compared with the complications of HIVPIs. However, the possibility that the molecular mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of FTIs may differ between HGPS and HIV PI-related metabolic disturbances cannot be excluded. Further studies are required to clarify whether this is the case.In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that a relatively low-dose of tipifarnib and lonafarnib prevented LPV/RTV-induced lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome in mice. These findings warrant a clinical trial to study the safety and efficacy of low-dose FTI on HAART-related metabolic complications in individuals living with HIV.
Authors: Esteban Martínez; Pere Domingo; María J Galindo; Ana Milinkovic; Juan A Arroyo; Francisco Baldovi; María Larrousse; Agathe León; Elisa de Lazzari; José M Gatell Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Eduard J Beck; Marco Vitoria; Sundhiya Mandalia; Siobhan Crowley; Charles F Gilks; Yves Souteyrand Journal: AIDS Date: 2006-07-13 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Bojana Milojkovic Kerklaan; Bojana Milojkovic Kerklaan; Veronique Diéras; Christophe Le Tourneau; Marja Mergui-Roelvink; Alwin D R Huitema; Hilde Rosing; Jos H Beijnen; Sandrine Marreaud; Anne-Sophie Govaerts; Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Jan H M Schellens; Ahmad Awada Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2012-09-29 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Leslie B Gordon; Joe Massaro; Ralph B D'Agostino; Susan E Campbell; Joan Brazier; W Ted Brown; Monica E Kleinman; Mark W Kieran Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Maria Eriksson; W Ted Brown; Leslie B Gordon; Michael W Glynn; Joel Singer; Laura Scott; Michael R Erdos; Christiane M Robbins; Tracy Y Moses; Peter Berglund; Amalia Dutra; Evgenia Pak; Sandra Durkin; Antonei B Csoka; Michael Boehnke; Thomas W Glover; Francis S Collins Journal: Nature Date: 2003-04-25 Impact factor: 49.962