| Literature DB >> 29434259 |
Ryuichiro Tanoue1,2, Keisuke Ohta3, Yoshihiro Miyazono3, Joe Iwanaga4, Akihiro Koba4, Toru Natori4, Osamu Iwamoto4, Kei-Ichiro Nakamura3, Jingo Kusukawa4.
Abstract
Previous investigatorsEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29434259 PMCID: PMC5809602 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21291-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Scanning electron microscopy images of the demineralised dentin matrix (DDM). (a) Processed granules. (b) Higher magnification of image a. The surfaces of the DDM are lubricous (c) and rough (d).
Figure 2Computed tomography assessment and light micrographs. (a) At 0 weeks, no radiopacity was visible in the defect regions in the demineralised dentin matrix (DDM)-implanted and control groups. Over 12 weeks, the defect region showed increasing radiopacity in the DDM-implanted group. (b) The bone volume/total defect volume (BV/TV) increased incrementally. At 12 weeks, there was a significant difference. (c) The horizontal plane of the defect area in the DDM group at 12 weeks. (d) Higher magnification of the square area in panel (c). Newly formed bone tissue with the DDM as the core is visible in the haematoxylin and eosin stained sections from the DDM-implanted group. (e) A serial section of the image in (d). Solid red–purple matrices of the dentinal tubules are visible in the toluidine blue-stained sections.
Figure 3Focused ion beam/scanning electron microscopy (FIB/SEM) tomography and three-dimensional (3D)-structure reconstruction. (a) The FIB/SEM tomography image of the interface between the implanted demineralised dentin matrix (DDM) and surrounding new bone. The left side shows the DDM, and the right side shows the newly formed bone tissue. (b) Higher magnification of the square area in panel (a). Some osteocytes surround the DDM. Images b-1 and b-2 are serial sections. (c) The 3D reconstruction image of the square area. Image c-2 is the DDM skeleton image of image c-1. The 3D reconstruction image confirms that osteocytes form a network with cell processes. (d) Higher magnification of the interface between the DDM and new bone in the 3D reconstruction image. Image d-2 is the torn section of image d-1. Some cell processes of the osteocytes extend into the dentinal tubules in the torn surface.
Figure 4Observation of block-face images (BFIs) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images. (a) BFIs of the dentinal tubules. The left images in a-1 and a-2 are at low magnification. Image a-1 shows low electron density regions in the dentinal tubules of non-implanted demineralised dentin matrix (DDM) particles. Image a-2 shows high electron density regions in the dentinal tubules of the implanted DDM particles. (b) A BFI of a DDM granule. The BFI image of the implanted DDM is at low magnification. In this image, the electron density of the dentinal tubules in the centre of the DDM (encircled area) is lower than that of the tubules on the outside of the DDM particles. The newly formed bone tissue surrounds the DDM. (c) Transmission electron microscopy images of the horizontal plane of the dentinal tubules. (c-1) The high electron density regions are observed within the dentinal tubules. Bone-like tissue is visible. (c-2) Higher magnification of image c-1. The processes tissue, which contrasts with the bone-like tissue, is in the centre of bone-like tissue.
Figure 5Elemental analysis of dentinal tubules, based on energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry. The yellow circles indicate the dentinal tubules, and the orange circles indicate the matrix. The Ca and P levels are higher in the implanted demineralised dentin matrix (DDM) particles than in the non-implanted DDM particles on the polished surface. The Ca and P levels are higher in the dentinal tubules than in the matrix.
Figure 6A schematic of the new-bone formation process after demineralised dentin matrix (DDM) transplantation.