Literature DB >> 29434044

Reply to Bennett et al.: IJROBP study is consistent with our findings and offers insights on author preferences.

Andrew Tomkins1, William D Heavlin2, Min Zhang3.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29434044      PMCID: PMC5834729          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1721699115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Radiation oncology authors and reviewers prefer double-blind peer review.

Authors:  Katherine Egan Bennett; Reshma Jagsi; Anthony Zietman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review.

Authors:  Andrew Tomkins; Min Zhang; William D Heavlin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.