Literature DB >> 29432754

Optimizing research in symptomatic uterine fibroids with development of a computable phenotype for use with electronic health records.

Sarah R Hoffman1, Anissa I Vines1, Jacqueline R Halladay2, Emily Pfaff3, Lauren Schiff4, Daniel Westreich1, Aditi Sundaresan5, La-Shell Johnson5, Wanda K Nicholson6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with symptomatic uterine fibroids can report a myriad of symptoms, including pain, bleeding, infertility, and psychosocial sequelae. Optimizing fibroid research requires the ability to enroll populations of women with image-confirmed symptomatic uterine fibroids.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop an electronic health record-based algorithm to identify women with symptomatic uterine fibroids for a comparative effectiveness study of medical or surgical treatments on quality-of-life measures. Using an iterative process and text-mining techniques, an effective computable phenotype algorithm, composed of demographics, and clinical and laboratory characteristics, was developed with reasonable performance. Such algorithms provide a feasible, efficient way to identify populations of women with symptomatic uterine fibroids for the conduct of large traditional or pragmatic trials and observational comparative effectiveness studies. Symptomatic uterine fibroids, due to menorrhagia, pelvic pain, bulk symptoms, or infertility, are a source of substantial morbidity for reproductive-age women. Comparing Treatment Options for Uterine Fibroids is a multisite registry study to compare the effectiveness of hormonal or surgical fibroid treatments on women's perceptions of their quality of life. Electronic health record-based algorithms are able to identify large numbers of women with fibroids, but additional work is needed to develop electronic health record algorithms that can identify women with symptomatic fibroids to optimize fibroid research. We sought to develop an efficient electronic health record-based algorithm that can identify women with symptomatic uterine fibroids in a large health care system for recruitment into large-scale observational and interventional research in fibroid management. STUDY
DESIGN: We developed and assessed the accuracy of 3 algorithms to identify patients with symptomatic fibroids using an iterative approach. The data source was the Carolina Data Warehouse for Health, a repository for the health system's electronic health record data. In addition to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis and procedure codes and clinical characteristics, text data-mining software was used to derive information from imaging reports to confirm the presence of uterine fibroids. Results of each algorithm were compared with expert manual review to calculate the positive predictive values for each algorithm.
RESULTS: Algorithm 1 was composed of the following criteria: (1) age 18-54 years; (2) either ≥1 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes for uterine fibroids or mention of fibroids using text-mined key words in imaging records or documents; and (3) no International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or Current Procedural Terminology codes for hysterectomy and no reported history of hysterectomy. The positive predictive value was 47% (95% confidence interval 39-56%). Algorithm 2 required ≥2 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes for fibroids and positive text-mined key words and had a positive predictive value of 65% (95% confidence interval 50-79%). In algorithm 3, further refinements included ≥2 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes for fibroids on separate outpatient visit dates, the exclusion of women who had a positive pregnancy test within 3 months of their fibroid-related visit, and exclusion of incidentally detected fibroids during prenatal or emergency department visits. Algorithm 3 achieved a positive predictive value of 76% (95% confidence interval 71-81%).
CONCLUSION: An electronic health record-based algorithm is capable of identifying cases of symptomatic uterine fibroids with moderate positive predictive value and may be an efficient approach for large-scale study recruitment.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparative effectiveness research; computable phenotype; electronic health records; positive predictive value; uterine fibroids; validation; women’s health

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29432754      PMCID: PMC6116524          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  13 in total

1.  Electronic health records based phenotyping in next-generation clinical trials: a perspective from the NIH Health Care Systems Collaboratory.

Authors:  Rachel L Richesson; W Ed Hammond; Meredith Nahm; Douglas Wixted; Gregory E Simon; Jennifer G Robinson; Alan E Bauck; Denise Cifelli; Michelle M Smerek; John Dickerson; Reesa L Laws; Rosemary A Madigan; Shelley A Rusincovitch; Cynthia Kluchar; Robert M Califf
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Electronic health record adoption and quality improvement in US hospitals.

Authors:  Spencer S Jones; John L Adams; Eric C Schneider; Jeanne S Ringel; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 3.  Disparities in Fibroid Incidence, Prognosis, and Management.

Authors:  Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Vanessa L Jacoby; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Validation of electronic medical record-based phenotyping algorithms: results and lessons learned from the eMERGE network.

Authors:  Katherine M Newton; Peggy L Peissig; Abel Ngo Kho; Suzette J Bielinski; Richard L Berg; Vidhu Choudhary; Melissa Basford; Christopher G Chute; Iftikhar J Kullo; Rongling Li; Jennifer A Pacheco; Luke V Rasmussen; Leslie Spangler; Joshua C Denny
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  New directions in the epidemiology of uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Shannon K Laughlin; Jane C Schroeder; Donna Day Baird
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 1.303

6.  An efficient approach for surveillance of childhood diabetes by type derived from electronic health record data: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.

Authors:  Victor W Zhong; Jihad S Obeid; Jean B Craig; Emily R Pfaff; Joan Thomas; Lindsay M Jaacks; Daniel P Beavers; Timothy S Carey; Jean M Lawrence; Dana Dabelea; Richard F Hamman; Deborah A Bowlby; Catherine Pihoker; Sharon H Saydah; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Enhancing uterine fibroid research through utilization of biorepositories linked to electronic medical record data.

Authors:  Lani Feingold-Link; Todd L Edwards; Sarah Jones; Katherine E Hartmann; Digna R Velez Edwards
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasound for determining fibroid burden: implications for research and clinical care.

Authors:  Eric D Levens; Robert Wesley; Ahalya Premkumar; Wendy Blocker; Lynnette K Nieman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Association Between Patient Characteristics and Treatment Procedure Among Patients With Uterine Leiomyomas.

Authors:  Bijan J Borah; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Evan R Myers; Xiaoxi Yao; Elizabeth A Stewart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  The burden of uterine fibroids for African-American women: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stewart; Wanda K Nicholson; Linda Bradley; Bijan J Borah
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.681

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical Annotation Research Kit (CLARK): Computable Phenotyping Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Emily R Pfaff; Miles Crosskey; Kenneth Morton; Ashok Krishnamurthy
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2020-01-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.