Literature DB >> 29432545

Effect of castration method and analgesia on inflammation, behavior, growth performance, and carcass traits in feedlot cattle.

S L Roberts1, J G Powell2, H D Hughes1, J T Richeson1.   

Abstract

Our objective was to determine the effect of castration timing, method, and use of the analgesic meloxicam (MEL) on inflammation, behavior, performance, and carcass traits in feedlot cattle. This study was a randomized complete block design conducted over a 3-yr period. In total, 194 crossbred beef calves from a single ranch origin were randomized at birth to receive one of five treatments arranged as a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial: 1) bulls castrated within 48 h of birth (CON), 2) bulls surgically castrated on day 0 without MEL (SUR), 3) bulls surgically castrated on day 0 with MEL (SUR + MEL), 4) bulls band castrated on d 0 without MEL (BAN), and 5) bulls band castrated on day 0 with MEL (BAN + MEL). Upon feedlot arrival (day -11; average 287 ± 2.03 d of age), animals were blocked by initial BW (224 ± 4.5 kg) and assigned randomly to treatment pens in three consecutive years (n = 2 pens per treatment in each year). Oral MEL was administered at 1 mg/kg BW concurrent with applicable castration treatment on day 0. Data were analyzed using the MIXED and GLIMMIX procedures of SAS with pen (year) serving as experimental unit. From days 0 to 7, ADG was reduced (P = 0.01) for surgical (-0.42) compared to band (0.43 kg/d) castration. Conversely, ADG was increased for surgical (1.74) vs. band (1.46 kg/d) castration from days 14 to 32. There was also an overall (day 0 to final) improvement in ADG for MEL (P = 0.02), but no effect of castration method was observed (P = 0.81). The CON group had the greatest (P = 0.05) marbling score. Backfat thickness was increased (P = 0.01) for MEL. A treatment × day interaction (P = 0.04) existed for serum haptoglobin, with SUR having the greatest (P < 0.01) concentration on days 1 and 4. Meloxicam administered in the surgically castrated treatment reduced (P = 0.01) serum haptoglobin concentration on day 1. Relative to baseline, standing duration for surgical castration was increased 113 min (P < 0.01), while banding caused 6.7 more lying bouts (P < 0.01) immediately following castration on day 0. Step count was greatest for BAN, intermediate for CON, and least for surgical (P < 0.01). Results suggest that MEL mitigated the more pronounced inflammation observed for surgical castration, whereas behavior was differentially altered for castration method indicative of a divergent pain response. Castration, regardless of method, transiently reduced ADG, but MEL administration improved overall ADG for both methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29432545      PMCID: PMC6140924          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skx022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  16 in total

1.  Effects of surgical or banding castration on stress responses and behaviour of bulls.

Authors:  A D Fisher; T W Knight; G P Cosgrove; A F Death; C B Anderson; D M Duganzich; L R Matthews
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 2.  Application of acute phase protein measurements in veterinary clinical chemistry.

Authors:  Henrik Hagbard Petersen; Jens Peter Nielsen; Peter Mikael Helweg Heegaard
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.683

3.  Pharmacokinetics of oral meloxicam in ruminant and preruminant calves.

Authors:  R A Mosher; J F Coetzee; C A Cull; R Gehring; B KuKanich
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 1.786

4.  Effects of meloxicam administration on physiological and performance responses of transported feeder cattle.

Authors:  T A Guarnieri Filho; R F Cooke; B I Cappellozza; M M Reis; R S Marques; D W Bohnert
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effect of castration technique on beef calf performance, feed efficiency, and inflammatory response.

Authors:  T M Warnock; T A Thrift; M Irsik; M J Hersom; J V Yelich; T D Maddock; G C Lamb; J D Arthington
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  The effect of prepubertal immunization against gonadotropin-releasing hormone on the development of sexual and social behavior of bulls.

Authors:  J G Jago; N R Cox; J J Bass; L R Matthews
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Evaluation of two-dimensional accelerometers to monitor behavior of beef calves after castration.

Authors:  Brad J White; Johann F Coetzee; David G Renter; Abram H Babcock; Daniel U Thomson; Daniel Andresen
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  Impact of oral meloxicam administration before and after band castration on feedlot performance and behavioral response in weanling beef bulls.

Authors:  P E Repenning; J K Ahola; R J Callan; J T French; R L Giles; B J Bigler; J F Coetzee; L W Wulf; R K Peel; J C Whittier; J T Fox; T E Engle
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Effect of different methods of castration on behaviour and plasma cortisol in calves of three ages.

Authors:  I S Robertson; J E Kent; V Molony
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.534

10.  Effect of surgical castration with or without oral meloxicam on the acute inflammatory response in yearling beef bulls.

Authors:  S L Roberts; H D Hughes; N C Burdick Sanchez; J A Carroll; J G Powell; D S Hubbell; J T Richeson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of a single dose of subcutaneous meloxicam prior to band or knife castration in 1-wk-old beef calves: II. Inflammatory response and healing.

Authors:  Sonia Marti; Daniela M Meléndez; Ed A Pajor; Diego Moya; Desiree Gellatly; Eugene D Janzen; Karen S Schwartzkopf-Genswein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: Pharmacokinetics and Mitigation of Procedural-Pain in Cattle.

Authors:  Brooklyn K Wagner; Emma Nixon; Ivelisse Robles; Ronald E Baynes; Johann F Coetzee; Monique D Pairis-Garcia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.