Literature DB >> 29432399

Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency contact force ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a propensity score analysis.

Mario Matta1, Matteo Anselmino1, Federico Ferraris1, Marco Scaglione2, Fiorenzo Gaita1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency and cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation are common approaches for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation treatment, showing similar results in recent multicenter studies, including heterogeneous tools and protocols. The aim of this study is to compare prospectively in a single, high-volume center the outcome of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation performed specifically by second-generation cryoballoon or contact force radiofrequency ablation.
METHODS: Consecutive patients scheduled for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation transcatheter ablation have been included and prospectively followed up. Aiming to reduce potential bias deriving from baseline characteristics, a propensity score matching analysis has been performed to analyze safety and efficacy outcomes.
RESULTS: Out of consecutive patients undergoing atrial fibrillation transcatheter ablation between January 2015 and December 2016, 46 patients approached by cryoablation were matched 1 : 1 by propensity score to a similar population treated by last-generation radiofrequency ablation. Freedom from atrial fibrillation after 12 months (76 vs. 78%, P = 0.804) and incidence of complications (4 vs. 6%, P = 0.168) did not differ between the two groups. Radiological exposure was higher for the cryoballoon group (11 vs. 4 min, P < 0.001), whereas procedural duration did not differ (P = 0.174). Aiming to assess the potential impact of a learning curve in patients undergoing cryoablation, the first-third of patients (n = 15) were compared with the remaining, reporting longer radiological exposure (P < 0.001), but similar safety and efficacy.
CONCLUSION: In this propensity score analysis, last-generation cryoballoon and radiofrequency catheters for atrial fibrillation ablation present similar efficacy and safety. Cryoablation requires longer fluoroscopy exposure compared with radiofrequency, although this is reduced by increased experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29432399     DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 1558-2027            Impact factor:   2.160


  4 in total

1.  Thermodynamic properties of atrial fibrillation cryoablation: a model-based approach to improve knowledge on energy delivery.

Authors:  Valter Giaretto; Andrea Ballatore; Claudio Passerone; Paolo Desalvo; Mario Matta; Andrea Saglietto; Mario De Salve; Fiorenzo Gaita; Bruno Panella; Matteo Anselmino
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Direct Comparison of Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation and Contact Force-Sensing Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Yoga Waranugraha; Ardian Rizal; Yoga Yuniadi
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-17

3.  Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety Endpoints of Five Therapies for Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tongyu Wang; Tingting Fang; Zeyi Cheng
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  Calorimetric analysis of ice onset temperature during cryoablation: a model approach to identify early predictors of effective applications.

Authors:  Elena Campagnoli; Andrea Ballatore; Valter Giaretto; Matteo Anselmino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.