| Literature DB >> 29432031 |
Katherine Flannigan1, Kamaldeep Gill2, Jacqueline Pei2, Gail Andrew3, Hasu Rajani3, Audrey McFarlane4, Teresa O'Riordan5, Brent Symes2, Carmen Rasmussen3.
Abstract
Early intervention for individuals with FASD is paramount, thus exploring factors that affect the diagnostic process is critical. This process can be complicated by challenges gathering background information, accurately evaluating higher-level cognitive skills across ages, and teasing apart the impact of life adversities from the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure. This study is a retrospective file review of 154 children (44% female; mean age 8.4 years, range 1.0 to 16.9) deferred at their first FASD assessment, and 51 (43% female; mean 9.9 years, range 2.7 to 17.2) who returned for a second assessment. Data was collected from three Canadian FASD clinics to explore reasons for deferral, the clinical profile of deferred children, why some returning children were diagnosed while others were not, and changes between assessments. Results suggest that deferred children initially lacked evidence of abnormalities sufficient for a diagnosis, presented with areas of relative neurobehavioral strength and difficulty, and children eventually diagnosed with FASD showed significantly more impaired brain function (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.547), postnatal risk (p = 0.021, ηp2 = 0.121), and comorbidities (p = 0.038, ηp2 = 0.085) than undiagnosed children. These findings provide important insights into the process of clinical assessment for FASD.Entities:
Keywords: Assessment; Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder; children; deferral; diagnosis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29432031 DOI: 10.1080/21622965.2018.1427094
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Neuropsychol Child ISSN: 2162-2965 Impact factor: 1.493