Literature DB >> 2943192

Comparison of psychomotor skills and amnesia after induction of anesthesia with midazolam or thiopental.

J A Reitan, W Porter, M Braunstein.   

Abstract

In two groups of 31 healthy patients undergoing minor elective surgery, anesthesia was induced intravenously with either midazolam maleate, 0.2 mg/kg, or thiopental, 3.5 mg/kg. All subjects received 2 micrograms/kg fentanyl 5 min before the induction agents. Induction time with midazolam was significantly longer than with thiopental (97.1 +/- 10.9 sec vs 59.4 +/- 5.0 sec) and time to orientation postoperatively was significantly longer after midazolam (31.7 +/- 4.2 min vs 11.0 +/- 1.1 min). Continued recovery after orientation, measured by a series of psychomotor tests, was also significantly longer with midazolam than with thiopental. Anterograde amnesia was evident in 84.8% of the midazolam treated patients and in only 31.4% of the thiopental group. This degree of absence of recall was acknowledged positively by the affected patients. The protracted recovery period may limit the use of midazolam in short surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2943192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the amnesic effects of midazolam and diazepam.

Authors:  M J Hennessy; K C Kirkby; I M Montgomery
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  In-vivo animation of midazolam-induced electrocorticographic changes in humans.

Authors:  Masaaki Nishida; Sandeep Sood; Eishi Asano
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 3.  Postoperative cognitive dysfunction versus complaints: a discrepancy in long-term findings.

Authors:  Jeanette B Dijkstra; Jellemer Jolles
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 4.  The use of microcomputer-based psychomotor tests for the evaluation of benzodiazepine effects on human performance: a review with emphasis on temazepam.

Authors:  G W Kunsman; J E Manno; B R Manno; C M Kunsman; M A Przekop
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Midazolam coinduction does not delay discharge after very brief propofol anaesthesia.

Authors:  T Elwood; S Huchcroft; C MacAdams
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Primacy and recency effects in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) using a serial probe recognition task. I. Effects of diazepam.

Authors:  C A Castro
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  At clinically relevant concentrations the anaesthetic/amnesic thiopental but not the anticonvulsant phenobarbital interferes with hippocampal sharp wave-ripple complexes.

Authors:  Costas Papatheodoropoulos; Evangelos Sotiriou; Dimitrios Kotzadimitriou; Panagiota Drimala
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  A prospective, randomized, double blind and placebo-control study comparing the additive effect of oral midazolam and clonidine for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in granisetron premedicated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystecomy.

Authors:  Ghanshyam Yadav; Biranchi Narayan Pratihary; Gaurav Jain; Anil Kumar Paswan; Lal Dhar Mishra
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.