Literature DB >> 2943150

Prediction of overexertion injuries using biomechanical and psychophysical models.

G D Herrin, M Jaraiedi, C K Anderson.   

Abstract

This paper summarizes a three year epidemiological study conducted in five large industrial plants in order to evaluate the validity of two alternative modeling approaches to overexertion injury prediction. Detailed biomechanical and psychophysical job evaluations were performed for 55 industrial jobs comprised of 2934 potentially stressful manual materials handling tasks. The medical experiences of 6912 incumbent workers were monitored retrospectively for two years and prospectively for one year to establish a data base for comparison of the different models. The results show that each of the models can be used to predict both the incidence and severity of certain overexertion types of injuries such as contact, musculoskeletal and back injuries. The application of these models to identify or design administrative and engineering controls, however, may be limited as a result of the inherent correlation between the available indices and multifaceted jobs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2943150     DOI: 10.1080/15298668691389829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J        ISSN: 0002-8894


  8 in total

1.  Influence of fatigue in neuromuscular control of spinal stability.

Authors:  Kevin P Granata; Greg P Slota; Sara E Wilson
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Quantifying relationships between selected work-related risk factors and back pain: a systematic review of objective biomechanical measures and cost-related health outcomes.

Authors:  Nancy A Nelson; Richard E Hughes
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.656

3.  Psychophysical basis for maximum pushing and pulling forces: A review and recommendations.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Thomas Waters; Jay Kapellusch; Waldemar Karwowski
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.656

4.  Effect of Repositioning Aids and Patient Weight on Biomechanical Stresses When Repositioning Patients in Bed.

Authors:  Neal Wiggermann; Jie Zhou; Nancy McGann
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Effects of Lifting Method, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift, Physiological Responses, and Safety Shoes Discomfort Rating.

Authors:  Fares F Alferdaws; Mohamed Z Ramadan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Pooling job physical exposure data from multiple independent studies in a consortium study of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Jay M Kapellusch; Arun Garg; Stephen S Bao; Barbara A Silverstein; Susan E Burt; Ann Marie Dale; Bradley A Evanoff; Frederic E Gerr; Carisa Harris-Adamson; Kurt T Hegmann; Linda A Merlino; David M Rempel
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Study protocol title: a prospective cohort study of low back pain.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Kurt T Hegmann; J Steven Moore; Jay Kapellusch; Matthew S Thiese; Sruthi Boda; Parag Bhoyr; Donald Bloswick; Andrew Merryweather; Richard Sesek; Gwen Deckow-Schaefer; James Foster; Eric Wood; Xiaoming Sheng; Richard Holubkov
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  The roles of lumbar load thresholds in cumulative lifting exposure to predict disk protrusion in an Asian population.

Authors:  Isabella Y-J Hung; Tiffany T-F Shih; Bang-Bin Chen; Saou-Hsing Liou; Ing-Kang Ho; Yue Leon Guo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.